MoveOn Flees Scarborough Country

January 16, 2004 | Self

[Puppage]

cited fears of 'being ambushed' by the show's host

Yet, curiously they're ok with spewing their flithy lies & runing away without backing anything up with FACT.

SOP of the evil left, wouldn't you say?

[N. Theknow]

MOveOn.org = moral cowards.

[RandallFlagg]

Which is why every time I get into a debate with these types, I win.

[sinkspur]

We all know, don't we Eva, that Joe Scarborough is sympathetic to MoveOn.org.

Why would the MoveOn.org chick flee if he's so sympathetic to them?

[NormsRevenge]

Yup .. nothing but cowards who wrap themselves in the flag and claim the protections of the Constitution while, at the same time, tearing at the moral fabric of our society.

[AppyPappy]

I imagine almost all MoveOn people are party hacks and probably don't know why they believe what they say. They just know how to parrot the views of their masters.

If a Democrat says A, they say A with firm conviction. If he changes his opinion to B, they never said A, they have always said B. They are like anti-Bushbots.

[Puppage]

You & me both, my friend.

[Prodigal Son]

I found it a striking contrast that another guest also on that evening's show was a young woman surfer who had her arm amputated by a shark yet who was now surfing again.

Some people can face diversity. Others, even with big time sponsors and foul-mouthed entertainers to give them moral support simply cut and run when the heat's on.

Who do you want beside you in the trenches? The young woman who battled the shark and came back for more or the MoveOn lady?

[rickmichaels]

...but practical experience teaches that it is hard to reckon with a spineless wretch who will not stand and defend his convictions.

On the contrary, it's laughably easy.

[Puppage]

Others, even with big time sponsors and foul-mouthed entertainers to give them moral support simply cut and run when the heat's on.

That's an excellent point.Another example of just how lame their point of view(s) are.

[atomic conspiracy]

"cited fears of 'being ambushed' by the show's host."

She felt a "chill wind," no doubt. LLLs really do equate opposition with oppression, and behave accordingly.

[mylife]

Nice post Son

[mylife]

This liberal internet attack dog hasn’t bitten for the dems. It has shown only an ability to pee on the rug in front of the dinner guests.

Im still laughing

[technochick99]

Some people can face diversity.

Your Freudian slip is showing... You mean 'adversity', right?

[Diddle E. Squat]

Well, at least she was true to her groups name. She did move on, just a bit quicker than expected...

[Prodigal Son]

Some things, spell-check will not fix ;-)

[Eva]

I guess that the gentle treatment that Joe gave the Move ON guy the night before was in preparation for last night's show. He probably knew if he came down too hard on them on Wed, they would never show on Thursday. He almost fooled them. Still, his treatment of the ad was unduly respectful. The WSJ did a much better job of evaluating and ridiculing the ad.

[Eva]

No, I don't think that these MoveOn people are Democrat hacks at all, they are far more radical than that. If you read the article in the WSJ, Dean is claiming that he is bringing in new voters to the Democrat party, people who would not even vote at all, if not for his leadership. These people are the real nut cases, the ones who would vote Green, if they voted at all. Maybe that's where Dean will end up, with the Green Party.

If you look into the group that made the winning ad, you will see that they are a utopian, socialist anarchy group, a real far out there bunch of people with a lot of money.

[Benrand]

Look, these people are just gullible kids, children and mental pupae.

They may grow up someday when daddy is done footing the bill for the damn plane rides.

Not surprising this girl has no backbone and was an emotional wreck. Most lefties are.