Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. May Allow French Firms to Bid on Iraq Contracts
Reuters ^ | Jan 15, 2004 | Arshad Mohammed

Posted on 01/15/2004 4:27:32 PM PST by optimistically_conservative

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is leaning toward reversing policy and allowing French firms to bid for prime contracts on some of $18.6 billion in reconstruction projects for Iraq (news - web sites), U.S. officials said on Thursday.

The Bush administration was also considering allowing all countries to bid on the next round of contracts, one official said, a move that would totally abandon President Bush (news - web sites)'s previous stand that only nations whose troops risked their lives in Iraq with American soldiers would be eligible.

U.S. officials, who asked not to be named, said they did not expect a decision or announcement about French firms for several weeks, adding that something could derail the emerging consensus within the administration.

Bush announced on Tuesday that Canadian firms would be allowed to bid on the contracts and administration officials have since said others, including companies from Germany and Russia, which like France opposed the Iraq war, could also be included.

"I've heard people backpedaling all over the government on this," said one official of the expected decision to include French companies. "We've got time. We've basically got a couple of weeks before the next round of tenders go out."

Bush effectively punished war opponents like Canada, France, Germany and Russia a month ago by banning them from bidding on the lucrative reconstruction projects. He said he was restricting contract bids to countries that risked lives in Iraq and "that's what the U.S. taxpayers expect."

U.S. officials have since privately acknowledged that the decision to bar some countries from the contracts was a public relations disaster and a self-inflicted wound and they have been looking for a way to repair the diplomatic damage.

The contracts controversy exploded just as presidential envoy James Baker was departing on a mission to gain European support for forgiving some of Iraq's $120 billion in foreign debt. France and Germany pledged substantial debt relief.

The shift on Canada followed an acknowledgment by U.S. officials that they wanted to put the bitter Iraq war debate behind them and patch up relations with allies who had opposed the U.S. decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).

One U.S. official said it would make sense to allow all nations to bid on the next round of contracts tendered under the $18.6 billion in U.S. funded projects, finally laying the controversy to rest.

A decision to allow some to bid in the next round but not others risked prolonging the irritation among other nations.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofweasels; contracts; france; iraq

1 posted on 01/15/2004 4:27:34 PM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
NUTS!
2 posted on 01/15/2004 4:28:47 PM PST by correctthought (Shop smart, shop S-mart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Fine. Let 'em bid. Just don't award them one effin contract.

No one guaranteed life was fair now, did they?
3 posted on 01/15/2004 4:30:29 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ...... FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info.. Check Muh Profile..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Wow no wonder some people here want Condi Rice to be President!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1058715/posts?q=1&&page=1
4 posted on 01/15/2004 4:32:00 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
a "public relations disaster" with who?

in any case, this will be tied to something done for us by the french. James Baker is not an idiot, like the author of this article is.
5 posted on 01/15/2004 4:34:11 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Bush got concessions. Just like he wanted.

The media will spin it the way they WANT to see it.

6 posted on 01/15/2004 4:45:38 PM PST by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
James Baker is not an idiot

Boy, you got that one right. He is not a pushover either.

7 posted on 01/15/2004 4:59:31 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Ja but we the U.S. tax payers are carp!
8 posted on 01/15/2004 5:06:04 PM PST by Righty1 (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
The way I read the tea leaves of this leak: the Administration is definitely going to open up the contract bidding to the French, German, and Russians. Who knows what secret diplomatic concessions are being made on either side?

There was no public relations disaster here in the US, despite the Reuters spin, but it behooves the Administration to make some nice to international UN-lovers.

9 posted on 01/15/2004 6:05:48 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Took the words right out of my fingers...let them bid...then send them home
10 posted on 01/15/2004 6:07:00 PM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
I am 110% behind the idea of letting the French bid on the contracts. Heck I'd even let them bid on protecting president Bush. With the caveat that the are NEVER EVER actually awarded the contract.

It takes time to prepare a bid and so if we keep them busy preparing bids, without actually getting business hurts their companies. And that is a cause that I can support ;-)
11 posted on 01/15/2004 7:00:09 PM PST by festus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Unabashed WTF
12 posted on 01/15/2004 8:29:51 PM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson