Skip to comments.
Terrorist threats to destroy US city posted on internet
UK Herald ^
| Jan. 15, 2004
| IAN BRUCE
Posted on 01/14/2004 10:30:45 PM PST by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
The threat is not over.
To: JustPiper; Cindy; WestCoastGal; Calpernia; Domestic Church; StillProud2BeFree; LayoutGuru2; ...
Well, what some of you found and we have been discussing for some time at the on-going "terrorist inforand analysis" thread, finally made it to the main media.
For those unfamiliar with it, the highly informative and interesting on going thread is here:
Al Qaeda again threatens New York, Washington and Los Angeles
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1013726/posts
To: Calpernia
ping
3
posted on
01/14/2004 10:34:35 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(Was O'Neill being blackmailed or did Clinton call in the aluminum favor? Only the Shadow knows.....)
To: FairOpinion
>The messages, posted on a number of
Islamic websites over the last week, say the countdown to attack has already begun.
Gotta feeling this was not on Mother Angelica's website.
To: FairOpinion
They claimed it would be "an even stronger strike than nuclear weapons". Shit...they've got asteroids?
Yeah, right, stronger than nukes...sure.
5
posted on
01/14/2004 10:38:35 PM PST
by
Polycarp IV
(http://www.cathfam.org/)
To: FairOpinion
6
posted on
01/14/2004 10:39:10 PM PST
by
risk
To: FairOpinion
are they implying a nuclear WMD? in the 1960's U-2 carried air sampling equipment to "sniff out" the various metals used in detonations ... even high in the atmosphere ...
the country of origin would likely be known ... after the fact of course ... crazy Islamikazis are trying to start World War III ...
7
posted on
01/14/2004 10:39:39 PM PST
by
Bobby777
To: FairOpinion
INTSUM
To: FairOpinion
We're dealing with TWO threats at the same time -- Muslim extremists and illegal immigration. You make a dangerous mistake if you don't realize the gravity of both.
To: FairOpinion
For those unfamiliar with it, the highly informative and interesting on going thread is here:
Err, pointless waste of time thread.
The UK Herald is basically a tabloid, btw. A lot of British stuff gets posted here without people understanding the source.
I cannot describe the enormity of yawns that I produce everytime I read an AQ Web threat story. They've supposedly been about to destroy 3 cities in the US in the next month for the past six months.
10
posted on
01/14/2004 10:40:48 PM PST
by
John H K
To: FairOpinion
Thanks for this ping! Was just telling hubby who is following a breaking story FNC, that the UK is not blocking out as much as the US is
11
posted on
01/14/2004 10:41:52 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: FairOpinion
"Asia for the Asiatics!"
"This is my last territorial demand!"
It didn't work for the fascists in the previous century, and it won't work in this one, either.
To: risk
Mecca, after.
13
posted on
01/14/2004 10:43:16 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(How do you know who is a moderate muslim? He is holding the remote control detonator.)
To: JustPiper
And here is another report about the terrorist threats:
http://www.emergency.com/ennday.htm Warning to American People Re-issued By Alleged Militants
WASHINGTON, DC: The "Third Warning" to the American people and the media was reposted on a number of jihad forums commonly used for communication to the Islamic fundamentalists interested in advancing terrorist activities. The reposting of this warning in conjunction with the latest release of the audiotape of Osama bin Laden, and specific references to portions of the 8th issue of the "Voice of Jihad" magazine appear to indicate a reinforcement of planned terror operations.
ERRI counter-terrorism analysts continue to examine the possibility that the "Voice of Jihad" messages are part of what appears to be a blizzard of misdirection and propaganda messages...or are they an actual "call to arms" being sent by Al-Qaeda-connected personnel?
To: FairOpinion
Did the Northeast Stupidity Network rename themselves Emergencynet, or is there yet another idiotic amateur pretend "terror analysis" site?
15
posted on
01/14/2004 10:46:53 PM PST
by
John H K
To: CAtholic Family Association
"Yeah, right, stronger than nukes...sure." One thing potentially stronger, would be poison gas. Sure there wouldn't be property damage. But multiple large releases around a metropolitan area can kill millions.
I sure as hell hope our leaders have the guts to counter-strike if this ever happens, by targeting every major city of unfriendly arab countries with multiple nukes. 1 billion dead arabs would be about right.
16
posted on
01/14/2004 10:47:01 PM PST
by
roadcat
To: John H K
"The UK Herald is basically a tabloid, btw."
==
Well, what do you think of the NY Times reporting on the FBI director's statements?
Clearly AQ is still intent on striking the question is not if they try, but when and whether we will be successful in foiling the attack, as we have been so far.
===
F.B.I. Director Calls Attack Quite Likely
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/15/national/15FBI.html Published: January 15, 2004
ASHINGTON, Jan. 14 The F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, said on Wednesday that terrorists would "quite probably" strike the United States again and that Al Qaeda remained a major threat despite the lowering of the nation's threat status last week.
"Al Qaeda would very much relish another high-profile attack within the United States in which numerous U.S. citizens would be killed," Mr. Mueller told reporters at a luncheon meeting sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. "We have disrupted their capability, but there are still persons out there who have that capability."
The sobering assessment echoed comments that he and other officials like Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge have made in recent months.
After three weeks of intense concerns about the threat of a hijacked airliner or other terrorist attack, the Bush administration lowered the threat level on Friday to yellow, or "elevated" status.
But, Mr. Mueller said, "We are still in a position where we have substantial concern about an attack from Al Qaeda," based on intelligence from the United States and overseas. "We quite probably will at some point in time have another attack."
Mr. Mueller said he saw reason for optimism because of improved sharing and analysis of intelligence, cooperation from allies and the captures of leading Qaeda figures.
To: roadcat
One thing potentially stronger, would be poison gas. Completely 100% wrong.
But multiple large releases around a metropolitan area can kill millions.
Pure, absolute nonsense.
18
posted on
01/14/2004 10:49:20 PM PST
by
John H K
To: FairOpinion
.
19
posted on
01/14/2004 10:51:17 PM PST
by
kimmie7
("Cleaning with the kids at home is like shoveling during a snowstorm." -- Phyllis Diller)
To: FairOpinion
I consider this a VERY sobering threat.
I do NOT feel we are remotely close to being out of the woods yet.
I believe they are quite right about their capabilities within some unknown degree of limitation--probably God's limitation.
But I suspect even God may allow them a measure of such destructiveness to wake our land up--perhaps to wake the world up. We went back to mindless sleep far too much and far too quickly after 911
20
posted on
01/14/2004 10:52:21 PM PST
by
Quix
(Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson