Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sterilization: Why It Is Wrong
Catholic Herald ^ | 1/15/04 | Fr. William P. Saunders

Posted on 01/14/2004 6:49:28 AM PST by new cruelty

I recently saw the movie "Cheaper by the Dozen." In it, the father, played by Steve Martin, states that he has had a vasectomy. This has caused some discussion among friends, especially because some people think that after 12 children one logically should have a vasectomy. Why does the Church teach that sterilization is wrong? — A reader in Ashburn

Before addressing the morality of sterilization, we must first remember that each person is a precious human being made in God’s image and likeness with both a body and a soul. Vatican II’s "Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World" asserted, "Man, though made of body and soul is a unity. Through his very bodily condition he sums up in himself the elements of the material world. Through him they are thus brought to their highest perfection and can raise their voice in praise freely given to the Creator. For this reason man may not despise his bodily life. Rather he is obliged to regard his body as good and to hold it in honor since God has created it and will raise it up on the last day" (no. 14). St. Paul also reminds us that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 6:19) and therefore we should not degrade our bodily dignity by allowing the body to participate in the act of sin. Moreover, such sin hurts the body of the Church.

Therefore, we are responsible to care for our bodily needs with proper nourishment, rest, exercise and hygiene. A person must not do anything to purposefully harm the body or its functions. For example, at times, we take medicine — over-the-counter as well as prescribed — to preserve our bodily health. However, we must not bring harm to our body by abusing legitimate drugs or using drugs known to be harmful.

Circumstances arise when a person may need surgery. To preserve the well-being of the whole body and really the whole person, an organ that is diseased or functioning in a way that harms the body may be removed or altered. For instance, surgery to remove an appendix that is about to rupture is perfectly moral as is surgery to remove a mole which appears to be pre-cancerous. However, cutting off a perfectly healthy hand, thereby destroying not only that bodily part but also its functions, is an act of mutilation and is morally wrong.

With this brief outline of principles, we can turn to sterilization. Here a distinction is made between direct and indirect sterilization.

Direct sterilization means that the purpose of the procedure was simply to destroy the normal functioning of a healthy organ so as to prevent the future conception of children. The most effective and least dangerous method of permanent sterilization is through vasectomy for a man and ligation of the fallopian tubes for a woman. Such direct sterilization is an act of mutilation and is therefore considered morally wrong. Regarding unlawful ways of regulating births, Pope Paul VI in his encyclical "Humanae Vitae" (1968) asserted, "Equally to be condemned ... is direct sterilization, whether of the man or of the woman, whether permanent or temporary" (no. 14). The Catechism also states, "Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law" (no. 2297).

Indirect sterilization is morally permissible. Here surgery, or drug or radiation therapy, is not intended to destroy the functioning of a healthy organ or to prevent the conception of children. Rather, the direct intention is to remove or to combat a diseased organ; unfortunately, the surgery or therapy may "indirectly" result in the person being sterilized. For instance, if a woman is diagnosed with a cancerous uterus, the performance of a hysterectomy is perfectly legitimate and moral. The direct effect is to remove the diseased organ and preserve the health of the woman’s body; the indirect effect is that she will be rendered sterile and never be able to bear children again. The same would be true if one of a woman’s ovaries or if one of a man’s testes were cancerous or functioning in a way that is harmful to overall bodily well-being. The caution in this discussion to uphold the morality is that the operation is truly therapeutic in character and arises from a real pathological need.

Lastly, further caution must be taken concerning the role of the state in this area. Pope Pius XI in his encyclical "Casti connubii" (1930) warned, "For there are those who, overly solicitous about the ends of eugenics, not only give certain salutary counsels for more certainly procuring the health and vigor of the future offspring ... but also place eugenics before every other end of a higher order; and by public authority wish to prohibit from marriage all those from whom, according to the norms and conjecture of their science, they think that a defective and corrupt offspring will be generated because of hereditary transmission, even if these same persons are naturally fitted for entering upon matrimony. Why, they even wish such persons even against their will to be deprived by law of that natural faculty through the operation of physicians."

Pope Pius XI was prophetic in his teaching, since shortly thereafter the world witnessed the eugenics program of Nazi Germany which included massive sterilization of those deemed "undesirable." In our world, various civil governments still toy with the idea of sterilization to solve welfare problems. Perhaps we may reach the point where health insurance companies pressure individuals to be sterilized rather than risk having children which may require high care.

Pope John Paul II warned in his encyclical "The Gospel of Life" ("Evangelium Vitae") of "scientifically and systematically programmed threats" against life. He continued, " ... We are in fact faced by an objective ‘conspiracy against life,’ involving even international institutions, engaged in encouraging and carrying out actual campaigns to make contraception, sterilization and abortion widely available. Nor can it be denied that the mass media are often implicated in this conspiracy, by lending credit to that culture which presents recourse to contraception, sterilization, abortion and even euthanasia as a mark of progress and a victory of freedom, while depicting as enemies of freedom and progress those positions which are unreservedly pro-life" (no. 17).

In all, the Catholic teaching on this issue respects the dignity of the individual in both his person and action.

Fr. Saunders is pastor of Our Lady of Hope Parish in Potomac Falls and a professor of catechetics and theology at Notre Dame Graduate School in Alexandria.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; sterilization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Paul C. Jesup
Huh?
41 posted on 01/15/2004 9:58:15 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Since your believe that poverty can be cured with sterilization, why not government corruption.
42 posted on 01/15/2004 10:15:31 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Unfortunately, the population of corrupt individuals continues from generation to generation through recruitment and not through reproduction. Otherwise . . .
43 posted on 01/15/2004 12:24:05 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I think sterlization could be a good thing. If the parents of Kerry, Dean, Gephard, all the Kennedys, and other far left liberals were all sterilized, we wouldn't have the problems we are having today.

Seriously, I don't think you can equate sterlization with abortion here.

If I had my way, I'd offer every woman on welfare an extra $10,000 check if she agreed to be sterilized. And you know those absentee dads - the guys who produce kids for somebody else to look after then run away to get some other woman pregnant?? Well, I wouldn't give them the option. It would be the surgical blade for ALL of them. In a few decades the recurrent problem of illegitimate parents producing more illegitimate kids would be significantly lessened.
44 posted on 01/15/2004 12:33:21 PM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
How sexist of you.
45 posted on 01/15/2004 1:53:32 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
However, cutting off a perfectly healthy hand, thereby destroying not only that bodily part but also its functions, is an act of mutilation and is morally wrong.

"And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell." -- Jesus

46 posted on 01/15/2004 1:57:40 PM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
NOT AT ALL.

Read the ENTIRE post.

I KNEW some weasely liberal out there would find something to say along those lines.
47 posted on 01/15/2004 2:01:06 PM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
A member of my family got a boob job and a porsch.I think she is a better negotiater.
48 posted on 01/15/2004 3:23:56 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (black dogs are my life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
You want to castrate men WITHOUT giving them a chance an explaination by them.

Check out the FR thread on childsupport horror stories commited against men.

49 posted on 01/15/2004 4:37:36 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
You want to castrate men WITHOUT giving them a chance an explaination by them.

Check out the FR threads on childsupport horror stories commited against men.

50 posted on 01/15/2004 4:38:34 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
It's a really nice bike.
51 posted on 01/15/2004 6:35:08 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Coleus,Sorry did not read bump.
52 posted on 01/15/2004 6:53:28 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-Go Eagles Go,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
No. I want to castrate males who spawn illegimate offspring that I wind up having to pay for and society winds up having to suffer under - social time bombs waiting to explode because they were conceived in lust and raised without a loving caring pair of parents to watch over them. Giving loose women the same treatment is another good idea.

Then if these losers want to fornicate like rutting animals, they can do so without producing unwanted burdens for the rest of us.

Sex is not a recerational sport. It is supposed to be something very special between two people who love each other and want to spend their lives together.

Hugh Heffner and his "playboy philosophy" went far towards destroying the American family and morality in America. The results are all around us.
53 posted on 01/16/2004 6:40:47 AM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
You seem to forget one thing. SOMETIMES THEY HONESTLY DON"T EVEN KNOW THEY ARE FATHERS!!

Also, the mother could never tell them.

The mother could be collecting childsupport AND welfare.

There is so much fruad on the FEMALE side of this problem, don't go blaming it all on men.

54 posted on 01/16/2004 9:27:48 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
"You seem to forget one thing. SOMETIMES THEY HONESTLY DON"T EVEN KNOW THEY ARE FATHERS!!"

YOU seem to forget that Virgin births are extremely rare - I can think of only one in the last two thousand years. If they don't keep their rocket in their pocket, they should be aware of the possible outcome and make SURE they AREN'T a parent.

"Also, the mother could never tell them."

Obviously not their fault, but in many cases, perhaps most, this is not the case.

"The mother could be collecting childsupport AND welfare."

Probably neither allows enough money to raise a kid decently in America today. Hence the need not to produce single parents and not to burden society with the consequences of their dalliances.

"There is so much fruad on the FEMALE side of this problem, don't go blaming it all on men."

I'm not blaming it all on men. Both are equally culpable. But generally, its the woman who has the kid, is left holding the bag, and the guys moves on to produce more illegitimate kids. Sometimes the mother does also.

But I guess you don't really get my point. My point is I do NOT want to have support some other person's mistake. I don't want society burdered with the ticking time bombs they create. I don't want any child to have to be raised without a nuclear family because two sets of gonads were calling to each other in the night without any moral, legal, or social commitment to each other, to the possible results of their actions, or to society as a whole.





55 posted on 01/16/2004 9:44:01 AM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The only way to end poverty is to sterilize the poor.

Jesus says the poor will always be with you, therefore there is no way to end poverty.

56 posted on 01/16/2004 9:47:34 AM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Your a lunatic if you think that men autmatically know they are fathers, but then you also, want to castrate all men, so it is obvious.

The fraud begins with the mother. You're blaming the WRONG gender. How about instead of welfare, the 'poor' mother should be forced to put the child up for adoption.

57 posted on 01/16/2004 9:54:48 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
"Your a lunatic.."

Ad hominem remark. Lose ten points.

"if you think that men autmatically know they are fathers"

If you keep your rocket in your pocket you can't become a father. Like I said, when people engage in sex as an indoor sport, they should be aware of the consequences and be prepared to face them.

"The fraud begins with the mother. "

It takes two to tango. The mother is always left with the kid. I never heard of a father giving birth. Its easier for a guy to behave like a moral slut and get away with it than a woman, although females ARE doing their best to catch up these days.

" How about instead of welfare, the 'poor' mother should be forced to put the child up for adoption."

A baby is ALWAYS better off with its natural mother AND father, unless they are abusive or have some serious mental problem.

The social problems of today are due, in very large part, to children having children, and illegimate births with kids growing up in a one parent or no parent home with no poistive moral models. Where do they get their moral role models if not from their parents? From television? From the movies? From political figures? From rock stars? From sports figures??

Again, I think you have a particular ax to grind which is obscuring your comprehension of what I'm saying here.
58 posted on 01/16/2004 10:07:33 AM PST by ZULU (Remember the Alamo!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
The mother is always left with the kid.

No, the mother always WANTS to keep the kid, because the kid is HER meal and shelter ticket.

The fraud begins with the mother.

59 posted on 01/16/2004 10:09:28 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
I do not dispute the words of Our Lord.

BUT, I do not believe that this ill, no matter how pervasive and enduring, should go unchallenged, notwithstanding Our Lord's pronouncement.

No way to end poverty? No way to end murder? drunkenness? theft? Sure, these are part an parcel of human nature. Let's not sit on our hands however, yes?

60 posted on 01/16/2004 10:29:51 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson