Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Says Increase in End Strength Not Likely For Now
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jan. 13, 2004 | By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA

Posted on 01/13/2004 3:38:13 PM PST by Calpernia

Despite what he called a "spike" in the operational tempo in Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said here today he hopes stress from increased operations will not lead to increased troop strength in the country.

"We hope and believe that the current stress that is being put on the force is a spike … a temporary increase, rather that what would prove to be a plateau," he told reporters during a Pentagon briefing. "Very simply, we do not expect to have 100,000 (or) 120,000 troops in a single country permanently deployed."

For troops under the stress of increased military operations, he said, the Defense Department is taking immediate actions to fix the problem -- from training more Iraqi security forces which now number close to 200,000 to increasing international military participation.

The secretary said justification for not increasing the military's end strength is not that the United States can't afford more troops. "Of course we can," he said. "The United States is perfectly capable of paying for additional forces if we decide that that's desirable. The question is whether, in the information age, measuring end strength is the only, or even the best, way to look at the problem, and whether permanently raising end strength would or would not be the best solution."

He said the 21st century requires a focus on quality, not quantity. "What is critical to success in combat is not necessarily mass, as much as capability," he said, noting that coalition forces in Iraq defeated a large enemy not with mass, "but with overmatching speed, power and agility."

DoD is investing in new information-age technologies -- precision weapons, unmanned air and sea vehicles and other less-manpower-intensive platforms and technologies -- as a way of improving force capability, Rumsfeld said. In addition, he said, the military is working to increase the "jointness" of its forces.

Other measures the department is taking to reduce stress on U.S. forces include rebalancing the active force with the Guard and Reserve to reduce reliance on involuntary mobilization. And the secretary said DoD is moving forward with its plan to civilianize thousands of military jobs, thus "freeing military personnel for military tasks."

Rumsfeld said the department already has used its emergency powers to temporarily increase end strength of U.S. troops by some 36,000. "That's a considerable increase," he said. But he noted that a permanent end-strength increase could prove to be the slowest, most expensive option for reducing stress on the force.

"The costs are sizeable over a lifetime of each added service member," he said, "and because of the time it takes to recruit, train and integrate new military personnel, the benefits really cannot be felt for some time."

The secretary also emphasized that a permanent increase in end strength would require cuts elsewhere in the defense budget, "crowding out funding for various types of transformational capabilities." Those capabilities, he said, would allow the military "to do more with the forces that we currently have."

Still, Rumsfeld told reporters, he will do whatever "makes the most sense."

"To the extent it involves an increase in end strength we will propose it to the president," he said. However, he added that he is comfortable "at the moment" with the actions DoD is taking.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dod; gnfi; iraq; operationfreedom; operations; pentagonbriefing; rumsfeld

1 posted on 01/13/2004 3:38:21 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Pro Military, Pro Coalition, Pro de-Baathification News!

"We hope and believe that the current stress that is being put on the force is a spike … a temporary increase, rather that what would prove to be a plateau," he told reporters during a Pentagon briefing. "Very simply, we do not expect to have 100,000 (or) 120,000 troops in a single country permanently deployed."

2 posted on 01/13/2004 3:39:19 PM PST by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
.

NEVER FORGET


...HILLARY, a Partner of our Terrorist Enemy HO CHI MINH during the Vietnam War, is calling for an increase in American Troops in Iraq.

...This is HILLARY's public call to reinstigate a Military Draft that helped bring about a Regime Change in the United States during the Anti-Draft turmoil of 1968.

...Turmoil that HILLARY herself did all that she could to help create,

...just like now.


The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been.


So...

in a new Time of War...


.."IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Senate Armed Services Committee..

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=629



Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer / Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965

http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_collection.htm
IA DRANG=1965 Photos)


NEVER FORGET

3 posted on 01/13/2004 4:04:04 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Rumsfeld ~ Bump!
4 posted on 01/13/2004 4:14:21 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Rummy, bump!
5 posted on 01/13/2004 4:19:01 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Transcript is worth reading. Includes some quintessential Rumsfeld.

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040113-secdef1142.html
6 posted on 01/13/2004 4:24:05 PM PST by bellevuesbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Sorry - I'm in the military, as are two of my kids. We're overextended now, and expect to be for a few more years. Information warfare doesn't police the streets, nor will it allow me to make a few more of my remaining kid's birthdays.

I'm pretty hard core military - got 20+ years in and will go remote this year - but I wish we had a few more people and less trust in networks!
7 posted on 01/13/2004 5:33:10 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Not sure I understood your post.
8 posted on 01/13/2004 5:35:07 PM PST by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Sorry. I'm not a Rummy fan. In acquisition, he's been pushing reform that, in essence, says to hand the contractors money and trust them. Having watched Lockheed Martin screw the US multiple times, I object.

I also think we need more people in the military. We're pushing the Guard & Reserve to the limit - and then some. When they don't re-up due to very long deployments because we don't have enough active duty, then what?
9 posted on 01/13/2004 5:43:10 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
You have too many issues in two paragraphs. I am not military, so I can't address them all correctly.

This is a Pro Military thread with plenty of Actives and Vets that were pinged and will be by. Maybe one of them can help you out.

Thanks for bumping the thread.
10 posted on 01/13/2004 6:54:10 PM PST by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Bump!
11 posted on 01/14/2004 10:23:00 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson