Skip to comments.
RAW RAGE AT BUSH DURING MOVEON.ORG AWARDS; TRANSCRIPT REVEALED
Drudge Report ^
| January 13, 2003
| Drudge
Posted on 01/13/2004 2:57:26 PM PST by GreatOne
The stars were out in Gotham on Monday night for the latest Bush Bashing Ball... More to follow.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alfranken; angrydems; braindead; bushhaters; chuckd; denmark; foreign; ignorant; lyingliars; margaretcho; moby; morons; moronsdotorg; moveon; moveonorg; neocommunists; nutjobs; reddupes; saddamites; sick; socialists; stalinsusefulidiots; usefulidiots; wackos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-186 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator
To: damnedhippie
If you scroll down on this thread you'll see that the transcript was posted.
Welcome to Free Republic.
162
posted on
01/15/2004 8:54:18 PM PST
by
Jean S
Comment #163 Removed by Moderator
To: weegee
I e-mailed her. I did not use foul language but I wasn't kind to her. She e-mailed back, a stock "witty" and snippy little note. These people cannot believe they can be called on the carpet for what they say. Sorry but the times have changed with the Internet, Talk Radio and Fox news.
To: GWPATTEN
Apart from possibly some family members, I doubt that many of these libs even know any conservatives. If they do, the conservatives are probably closeted. They have probably been beaten into silence by the libs outbursts of profanity.
I know loudmouthed libs who I refuse to discuss my politics with (more than a handful). I just let the jackasses prattle on. I certainly never speak up and "agree" with what they say, I just don't choose to offer rebuttal to a debate I never wanted to enter.
The libs I know will trash talk anyone from Johnny Ramone to Lionel Hampton for daring to be conservatives (and they didn't even force their politics on their fans). These libs will cast out anyone they know to be a conservative. I believe that these Rats have the right to be as ignorant as they want to be; I'm not so petty as to refuse to speak to someone just because they voted for a candidate that I abhor.
The left is stressed. Re-elect President Bush and force them to have to deal with the fact that Bush WAS elected President (he was elected in 2000 but many of them still refuse to believe it; these same people believed Bill Clinton when he said he didn't have an affair).
165
posted on
01/16/2004 9:24:48 AM PST
by
weegee
Comment #166 Removed by Moderator
To: Bob King
I've had liberal friends who could discuss issues and that I was open with my political views. I just do not personally know any rational libs in town at this point; the ones that I do know are rabid in their hatred of all things conservative.
167
posted on
01/16/2004 7:21:29 PM PST
by
weegee
To: JeanS
Looks like we've got some "newbie" traffic here. Maybe if they read a few dozen threads before shooting their mouths off they'll realize that just because we are conservatives does not mean that we are lockstep in our views on issues.
We do come with some basic agreements on truths.
Maybe some of this traffic that Miss Cho is sending us will change their political stripe after reading FR awhile. It's happened before and there are a number of former libs and former democrats who signify this with their Freeper names.
168
posted on
01/16/2004 7:31:21 PM PST
by
weegee
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
He was trying to say that dems/anti-freepers wouldn't write emails pretending to be freepers. (LOL) I've seen that very same type of discussion in the past and then seen someone post the brag thread from DirtyUnderwear. DUsruptors lie.
169
posted on
01/16/2004 7:35:23 PM PST
by
weegee
To: Wolverine
I honestly can't believe people don't care that the guy who produced this ad and 'won' does not even live here, and apparently has not for a while. I bet those kids are not even American kids. I guess this is moveon's way of illustrating that dislike for GW really is 'global', and kind of slipping one over on us dumb conservatives.
To: unsycophant
I guess this is moveon's way of illustrating that dislike for GW really is 'global', and kind of slipping one over on us dumb conservatives.Yeah, probably so. But they might just find out that the so called "silent majority" isn't so silent anymore.
171
posted on
01/17/2004 1:33:11 AM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
To: unsycophant
Don't forget that funds from foreign sources are also ILLEGAL.
172
posted on
01/17/2004 1:48:59 AM PST
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: weegee
DirtyUnderwear..
LOL that's a good one!
173
posted on
01/17/2004 7:34:59 AM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
To: GreatOne
When Bush wins next November these odious characters will flip out. That will be fun. :)) He who laughs last laughs best. ;)
174
posted on
01/17/2004 7:39:45 AM PST
by
veronica
("Clinton happens"....F. Lee Mark Levin)
To: GreatOne
They will say anything and do anything to get rid of even a centrist such as GWB, who they see as their sworn enemy. Make no bones about it. Logic has no bearing here.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Goes right along with the pantloads they drop here as disrupters and their red diaper baby upbringing.
176
posted on
01/17/2004 3:52:28 PM PST
by
weegee
To: Dec31,1999
Logic has no bearing here. It's just as illogical as NOW defending a sexual harasser and serial rapist. Even if the affair with Monica and other underlings was consensual, feminists have long railed against the concept of the casting couch and the secretary who shares a room with her boss on weekend "business trips".
177
posted on
01/17/2004 3:54:43 PM PST
by
weegee
To: unsycophant
They outsourced the ad to hire cheaper labor. Someone should investigate whether those kids were even paid to appear in the ad (their parents may have been Bush haters who told their kids they had to do it).
178
posted on
01/17/2004 3:56:53 PM PST
by
weegee
Comment #179 Removed by Moderator
To: All
This site is called "Free Republic", now if we all truly believe in a "Free Republic", shouldn't we support everyone's rights to voice their opinions? Even if we don't agree with them? Here is a site with emails attacking Margaret Cho. It mentions that most of the traffic has come from this site.
http://www.margaretcho.com/attacks_from_the_right.htm Really, I used to enjoy some of what I read here in the past, but I have to say I am ashamed to be associated with this much hatred!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-186 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson