No, no, no -- Appeasement works! If we just do what OBL asks, everything will be fine. /sarcasm
Posted on 01/13/2004 3:20:09 AM PST by SandRat
The strategic reason for crushing Saddam was to reverse the tide of global terror that incubated in the Middle East.
Is our pre-emptive policy working? Was the message sent by ousting the Baathists as well as the Taliban worth the cost?
Set aside the tens of thousands of lives saved each year by ending Saddam's sustained murder of Iraqi Shia and Kurds, which is of little concern to human rights inactivists. Consider only self-defense: the practical impact of U.S. action on the spread of dangerous weaponry in anti-democratic hands.
1. In Libya, Col. Gadhafi took one look at our army massing for the invasion of Iraq and decided to get out of the mass-destruction business. He has since stopped lying to gullible U.N. inspectors and - in return for U.S. investment instead of invasion - promises civilized behavior. The notion that this terror-supporting dictator's epiphany was not the direct result of our military action, but of decade-long diplomatic pleas for goodness and mercy, is laughable.
2. In Afghanistan, a grand conclave of leaders freed by U.S. power surprised the Arab world's doubting despots with the elements of a constitution that leads the way out of the past's abyss of barbarism.
3. In Syria, a hiding place for Saddam's finances, henchmen and weaponry - and exporter of Hezbollah and Hamas terrorism - the dictator Bashar Assad is nervously seeking to reopen negotiations with Israel to regain strategic heights his father lost in the last Syrian aggression. Secret talks have already begun; this would not have happened while Saddam was able to choke off illicit oil shipments to Syria.
4. On the West Bank, incipient Israeli negotiations with Syria - on top of the overthrow of the despot who rewarded Palestinian suicide bombers - further isolates the terror organizations behind Yasser Arafat. Under the pressure of Israel's security fence, and without the active support of Egypt and Saudi Arabia (each eager to retain protection of a strong-willed Bush administration), Palestinians now have incentives to find an anti-terrorist leader who can deliver statehood.
5. In Iran, the presence of 130,000 U.S. troops near the border was not lost on the despot-clerics in power, who suddenly seemed reasonable to European diplomats seeking guarantees that Russian-built nuclear plants would be inspected. Colin Powell has been secretly dickering with the so-called reform ayatollah for a year in hopes of being on the right side of a future revolution. The old "Great Satan" crowd has just barred four-score reformist Parliament members from seeking re-election. That panicky crackdown in Tehran is a sign of the rulers' weakness.
6. In Iraq, where casualties in Baghdad could be compared to civilian losses to everyday violence in New York and Los Angeles, a rudimentary federal republic is forming itself with all the customary growing pains.
But we did not depose Saddam to impose a puppet; we are helping Iraqis defeat the diehards and resist fragmentation to set in place a powerful democratic example.
Columnist Jim Hoagland cautions that it is too early to proclaim that nonproliferation is "spinning into control." But taken together, this phased array of fallout to our decision to lead the world's war against terror makes the case that what we have been doing is strategically sound as well as morally right.
William Safire is a columnist for The New York Times, 229 W. 43rd St., New York, N.Y. 10036; e-mail: safire@nytimes.com.
It's like what Shakespeare wrote about treason : appeasement never fails, because when it fails none dare call it appeasement...
bttt
First humiliation, then denial. Then restoration of respect, accompanied by more denial. Then frustration, accompanied by the realization of defeat. Then capitualtion, accompanied by realignment of power. Then peace.
Those who rejoiced in our comeuppance now join us in silent pleading for an end to this madness, and this particular enemy requires an applauding audience to raise the curtain on another play.
This war is not yet won, but we must realize what we have done right, and the role psychology plays in all wars. There are more snakes in the grass, but they are scurrying, hissing and feinting, but no longer feeling invited to approach us with impunity.
Are they sane or not? I have a nagging suspicion that the '72 virgin/martyr bonus' will become a tougher sell, except to the weakest of their kind.
Is our pre-emptive policy working? Was the message sent by ousting the Baathists as well as the Taliban worth the cost?
Set aside the tens of thousands of lives saved each year by ending Saddam's sustained murder of Iraqi Shia and Kurds, which is of little concern to human rights inactivists. Consider only self-defense: the practical impact of U.S. action on the spread of dangerous weaponry in anti-democratic hands.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
William Safire's editorial follows a string of year-end editorials with a common (common sense) theme: the war in Iraq is ~ and was ~ just.
Walter Cronkite and Jane Fonda are saddened.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you want on or off my, Calpernia, and xzin's Pro-Coalition ping list, please Freepmail one of us. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.