Posted on 01/12/2004 11:13:11 AM PST by neverdem
Antis' Efforts to Stop Hunting Backed By Multi-Million Dollar Budgets- (12/31) National Join our e-mail alert list
As in previous years, Animal People magazine has published financial information for 136 animal charities, based on analysis of the groups' IRS reports for FY 2002.
Below are the figures for several leading animal rights groups that are working to end hunting, fishing and trapping in America, as presented in Animal People. In parenthesis are the budgets for the immediate past years.
The budgets for most of the groups stayed level or dipped somewhat, but People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) budget grew from $13.5 million to $16.4 million in 2002. The Humane Society of the United States had an even bigger increase in its budget, from $58.8 million to $67 million.
Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF)
· budget $3,208,308 ($3,360,728 / $3,133,399 / 2,929,360)
· programs 2,543,747
· overhead 664,561
· net assets 2,407,032
Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) (previous years not immediately available)
· budget $1,260,416 ($1,072,951)
· programs 1,117,926
· overhead 142,490
· net assets 2,486,967
Doris Day Animal League (DDAL)
· budget $2,570,372 ($2,844,347 / $2,743,811 / $2,298,227)
· programs 1,977,752
· overhead 592,620
· net assets 753,186
Fund for Animals
· budget $7,358,158 ($5,600,721 / $5,386,201 / $6,383,888)
· programs 5,766,004
· overhead 1,592,154
· net assets 20,225,940
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
· budget $67,272,795 ($58,865,207 / $50,431,797 / $51,560,147)
· programs 38,620,876
· overhead 23,453,737
· net assets 85,810,587
In Defense of Animals (IDA)
· budget $2,304.433 ($2,339,784 /$1,841,705 / $1,707,270)
· programs 1,878,120
· overhead 426,313
· net assets 2,512,588
PETA and PCRM: Partners in Fundraising
The Animal People report indicates that PETA and Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) should be considered as a single fundraising unit because of its joint partnership in Foundation to Support Animal Protection. Here are the numbers for the three entities:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
· budget $16,414,174 ($13,499,614 /$17,668,699 / $16,487,851)
· programs 13,741,587
· overhead 2,672,587
· net assets 5,079,120
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM)
· budget $2,667,912 ($2,915,847 / $2,533,289 / $2,350,143)
· programs 2,107,232
· overhead 560,680
· net assets 887,109
Foundation to Support Animal Protection (FSAP)
· budget $2,192,281 ($2,430,555)
· programs 29,718
· overhead 2,162,563
· net assets 9,616,986
In 2003 the Missouri deer herd was 1,200,000 animals.
Controled deer harvesting has been allowed since 1944, but the herd has continued to grow. Deer harvested in 2003 about 250,000 animals.
Officials of the Missouri Department of Conservation have stated that the population of mountain lions will increase with the larger deer herd.
At present mountain lions are protected from any type of "sport hunting " in Missouri. Mountain lions attack and kill humans, the liberal, tree hugging state of California is an example.
Should mountain lions increase to the point of becoming dangerous to humans, the common sence approach of Shoot & Shovel will come into being long before the politicans would even think of acting.
If you notice, many municipalities actually have a deer overpopulation problem. Why do you suppose that is? Because not enough people are killing them there.
Bear attacks happen because not enough people hunt them. Bears are not stupid enough to attack a human they perceive as dangerous. Not enough hunting pressure, over generations, and the animals lose their fear of humans, and begin to see them as a food source.
The creation is fallen, and animals that spill human blood,the Bibles says, will have to give account for it. The same is not said in regards to humans killing animals... only humans killing other humans.
Figures a woman would say this.
Oh ya think? ;-) But it serves the purposes of her argument, so who cares?
/sarcasm
Never had a bird flush while hunting, have you?
rebelyell and everyone, we have it straight from the horse's mouth. EAT MORE VENISON!
Shooting clay birds laying on the ground is not sporting clays. Blond
Hmm. Tell you what, I'll put you up in a shack in a valley prone to beaver dams on one condition--you have to wear this invisible fence collar that prevents you from leaving.
Seriously, I've known several occasions in which DNR types have had to dynamite not only the dams, but the lodges or holes ( if they're bank beaver ) because of extensive damage occurring to the local ecosystem.
HEY! Watch it bub. I've talked to a really wussy guy that said this silly stuff too. He even was supposed to be a Christian. He *was* a teenager from California though, maybe that explains it.
Wrong. Coyotes here kill pets, turkeys and deer fawns.
Some animals that are for eating should be put down very humanely
All hunters try their best to do so. Reduces tracking time and saves the meat.
and animal research is not needed for the most part but if it is it should not have the animal suffering.
Animal research may lead to the cure for cancer someday.
Fishing for fish well that is hard, I guess fishing is okay
Fishing is no different than hunting, and the death of a fish is shall we say, less 'humane' than a gunshot wound.
Shooting birds when there flying in the air also should be banned no need for it...
Now that doesn't even make sense.
hmm. Sorta like fishing--casting out the line and waiting for a nibble?
There are almost 70,000 deer-car crashes in my state. Two deaths in less than a week during rutting season in my county.(160,000 people)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.