Skip to comments.
Antis' Efforts to Stop Hunting Backed By Multi-Million Dollar Budgets
U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance ^
| Dec 31, 2003
| NA
Posted on 01/12/2004 11:13:11 AM PST by neverdem
Antis' Efforts to Stop Hunting Backed By Multi-Million Dollar Budgets- (12/31) National Join our e-mail alert list
As in previous years, Animal People magazine has published financial information for 136 animal charities, based on analysis of the groups' IRS reports for FY 2002.
Below are the figures for several leading animal rights groups that are working to end hunting, fishing and trapping in America, as presented in Animal People. In parenthesis are the budgets for the immediate past years.
The budgets for most of the groups stayed level or dipped somewhat, but People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) budget grew from $13.5 million to $16.4 million in 2002. The Humane Society of the United States had an even bigger increase in its budget, from $58.8 million to $67 million.
Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF)
· budget $3,208,308 ($3,360,728 / $3,133,399 / 2,929,360)
· programs 2,543,747
· overhead 664,561
· net assets 2,407,032
Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) (previous years not immediately available)
· budget $1,260,416 ($1,072,951)
· programs 1,117,926
· overhead 142,490
· net assets 2,486,967
Doris Day Animal League (DDAL)
· budget $2,570,372 ($2,844,347 / $2,743,811 / $2,298,227)
· programs 1,977,752
· overhead 592,620
· net assets 753,186
Fund for Animals
· budget $7,358,158 ($5,600,721 / $5,386,201 / $6,383,888)
· programs 5,766,004
· overhead 1,592,154
· net assets 20,225,940
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
· budget $67,272,795 ($58,865,207 / $50,431,797 / $51,560,147)
· programs 38,620,876
· overhead 23,453,737
· net assets 85,810,587
In Defense of Animals (IDA)
· budget $2,304.433 ($2,339,784 /$1,841,705 / $1,707,270)
· programs 1,878,120
· overhead 426,313
· net assets 2,512,588
PETA and PCRM: Partners in Fundraising
The Animal People report indicates that PETA and Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) should be considered as a single fundraising unit because of its joint partnership in Foundation to Support Animal Protection. Here are the numbers for the three entities:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
· budget $16,414,174 ($13,499,614 /$17,668,699 / $16,487,851)
· programs 13,741,587
· overhead 2,672,587
· net assets 5,079,120
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM)
· budget $2,667,912 ($2,915,847 / $2,533,289 / $2,350,143)
· programs 2,107,232
· overhead 560,680
· net assets 887,109
Foundation to Support Animal Protection (FSAP)
· budget $2,192,281 ($2,430,555)
· programs 29,718
· overhead 2,162,563
· net assets 9,616,986
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: animalrights; bang; fishing; hunting; trapping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 481-494 next last
Know your enemies. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) is a name to remember. IIRC, the head of PCRM is married to the head of PETA, Ingrid Newkirk. I must confess that I don't care for trapping. It reminds me of landmines. As an issue in the media, it's a looser.
1
posted on
01/12/2004 11:13:13 AM PST
by
neverdem
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: neverdem
These are the people who need to have a bear or cougar on their front porch while the kids are in the backyard. That is a mind changer par excellance.
3
posted on
01/12/2004 11:18:49 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
To: neverdem
Sport hunting of any kind should be banned there is no reason for it none...
Some animals that are for eating should be put down very humanely, and animal research is not needed for the most part but if it is it should not have the animal suffering.
Animals for coats and shoes are barbaric there are plenty of beautiful synthetic or wool coasts Mink is just a status symbol.
Fishing for fish well that is hard, I guess fishing is okay but not Marlin, Dolphin, Whale, Seal.
Shooting birds when there flying in the air also should be banned no need for it...
4
posted on
01/12/2004 11:22:00 AM PST
by
missyme
To: GreatEconomy; Terriergal; dorben
Doris Day Animal League,,, what ever will be, will be - on a $US2,5m budget.
To: GreatEconomy
Ban Trapping no need for it...
6
posted on
01/12/2004 11:26:30 AM PST
by
missyme
To: missyme
"Ban Trapping no need for it..."
I take it you've never had a beaver chew down the shade trees around your pond.
To: missyme
You forgot your sarcasm tag, city girl!
8
posted on
01/12/2004 11:30:19 AM PST
by
CSM
(Councilmember Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
To: missyme
As I consider what you have written, I hope you remember this post the next time you hit a deer.
A couple of years ago there was a soccor tournament. A family from out of town was traveling between events. They hit a deer on the bypass around town. It went through the windshield, killed the driver (Dad), and the head came off and landed on the kids in the back seat. We could have used a hunter that day.
To: green iguana
Why can't you just catch them and move them somewhere else, and you are right no Beavers in San Diego but if I had any I would put them in a place where they could build there dams they serve a purpose in life...
10
posted on
01/12/2004 11:31:30 AM PST
by
missyme
To: neverdem
These are the "doctors" who testify against the Adkins Diet. Real reason, the Adkins Diet is high in animal protein.
11
posted on
01/12/2004 11:31:42 AM PST
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: missyme
I plan on trapping some fox next year so I can send it to a furrier to make my wife a coat. BWWWAAAAAAHHHHHAAAAAA.
To: GreatEconomy
Why are you against trapping? I said it reminds me of landmines. A friend of mine lost his leg in Viet-Nam by one, and we used them plenty in automatic(mechanical) ambushes. Now in Iraq we have improvized explosive devices(IED) taking plenty of our casualties. This is not stand up fighting or killing food to eat. When the media gets on it, it's a looser, forget about the economics.
15
posted on
01/12/2004 11:34:15 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: missyme
"I would put them in a place where they could build there dams"
I would really like to see you do that. ROFLOL! Let me know. I want to watch "you put them" ANYWHERE.
16
posted on
01/12/2004 11:34:56 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: Sunshine Sister
No that is a horrible tragic story, but animals killing people are far less than people killing people in vehicular accidents,Animals are being driven out of there homes by human beings, what are they to do? If we have to many in the wild than Catch him move them where they can roam free or last result euthanize them so they will not suffer.
17
posted on
01/12/2004 11:35:14 AM PST
by
missyme
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: missyme
Ban Trapping no need for it... ,,, I agree entirely - all those guns and we're talking traps? Remington/Winchester BUMP.
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 481-494 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson