Posted on 01/12/2004 7:46:07 AM PST by kellynla
If George Bush’s amnesty for between 8 million and 14 million illegal aliens is enacted, you can kiss the old America goodbye.
Consider what the president is saying with his amnesty. He is telling us that he cannot or will not do his constitutional duty to defend the states from invasion. He is saying that he simply cannot or will not protect our borders or enforce our immigration laws. He is saying he will no longer send illegal aliens back.
Not long ago, this would have produced calls for impeachment and cries that, “If Bush won’t enforce our laws, let’s elect a president who will.”
By offering amnesty and residency to millions who broke in line, broke our laws and broke into our country, Bush is not only rewarding wholesale criminality, he proposes to legalize it.
His amnesty will send this message to the world: the candy store is open, and the Americans cannot protect it. Now is the time to bust in.
As there must be billions of people willing to come and work for a fraction of our minimum wage—and exploit our social safety net—the number who could come under the Bush guest-worker program is almost infinite.
Imagine a car wash that employs 40 African-American, Latino, and white working-class folks at $8 an hour each. A new car wash down the street opens up, offering 40 new jobs at $5.15 an hour. No Americans apply. Under Bush’s proposal, that employer would be free to go to Asia, Africa, and Latin America, round up workers, and bring them in.
The new car wash with its foreign workers then drives the old car wash with its American workers out of business. Taxpayers are then forced to subsidize the newly unemployed—and pay for the medical care, food stamps, rent supplements, welfare, and schooling of all the new immigrants and their families, provide legal services when they get in trouble and pay for more cops to police their neighborhoods.
And every child born of a guest worker would, under our 14th Amendment, become an American citizen, automatically entitled to all the benefits of citizenship. Meanwhile, Bush’s amnesty will do nothing to halt the illegal invasion that continues to this hour. If you would know what America’s social, cultural, and fiscal future will look like, take a ride through Los Angeles, capital of Mexifornia.
But why did President Bush pick now to propose as explosive an idea as amnesty, when it seemed he was holding a winning hand on the issues of taxes, national security, the economy, and gay marriages?
One sees here the cynical ploy of “Boy Genius” Karl Rove. With the filing deadlines for the Republican primaries having passed and no GOP opponent, with no Third Party challenger from the Right, and with Dean the likely Democratic nominee, Rove knows conservatives are boxed in. In the old cliché, “The conservatives have nowhere else to go.”
So Rove is executing an “apertura a sinistra,” an opening to the Left, pandering to Hispanics and Mexican President Vicente Fox, to whom Bush is to pay a visit.
But Rove may be too clever for the president’s good. For there is no hard evidence that Hispanics, other than those militants who detest Republicans, are demanding amnesty. And with Bush’s spending on foreign aid soaring, his deficits rising, and the White House refusing to veto a single spending bill, Rove & Co. may have stretched conservative loyalty to the breaking point.
For some conservatives, this amnesty will snap it. They may just get on their hind legs and fight, for huge majorities have repeatedly registered opposition to any amnesty for illegal aliens. How is the president helped by a bloody battle with his political base in an election year?
Half a century ago, Dwight Eisenhower, informed there were a million illegals in the United States, most of them from Mexico, ordered them sent back. The project was called “Operation Wetback.”
Ike was a strong president. But in George W. Bush, we have a leader unwilling to pay the political price of doing his duty and enforcing the immigration laws of his country because he fears the reaction from the media elite and Mexican-Americans.
When it comes to standing up to truly powerful ethnic lobbies—the Hispanic Lobby, the Cuban-American Lobby, the Israeli Lobby—Bush wilts and folds every time. Nor is it a healthy sign for the future of our republic when its president offers an amnesty to law-breakers, rather than doing his painful duty to protect his country from what has now become an unstoppable foreign invasion.
The real threats to America’s survival do not come from the Sunni Triangle. They come from within, and unfortunately we have a president who either does not understand them or will not look them in the face.
Police or army?
My guess is deporting 10 million people will require the latter...and, if they don't go quietly, guess where the fighting will be done?
Pat Buchanan is not a conservative.
Buchanan did more than anyone else to make this policy a reality.
That guy should do us a favor and go back to Ireland or wherever he's from.
But I doubt they'd take him.
If the conversation on the subject would stay a civil and intelligent debate without being reduced to name calling and juvenile behavior I'd get on one of those threads.
But I'm sick of the Bush bashing and the insanity, The election can't come fast enough for me!
Don't bother answering back because I'm serious about not wanting to come to any immigration threads!
No simple matter.
I'd make language proficiency a pre-requisite for hiring. It can't be faked so the INS job would be much simpler. Of course, illegals would then take the trouble to learn English and would still come here...but they'd be much easier to integrate into our society.
A slogan used by certain groups prior to WWII.
Prior to WWI they were called Know-Nothings.
"...would destabilize Mexican government?" Then they need to do the things that will give their own country stability. If not, too bad
I guess it would be of no concern to you if American trade with Mexico was disrupted, American businesses and property in Mexico were seized, American retirees killed, and a Castro took over?
Surely not. America First.
The majority of illegal aliens and other border intruders come from Mexico. The country of Mexico has the 9th largest economy in the world - they are relatively well off, better off than almost every other country in the entire world. Over 5 billion people live in nations that are worse off economically than Mexico. How many of those 5 billion people should we, in being "inclusive, benerous, and decent society" let into our country? How many?!
Even if we took in 1 to 2 million people per year from impoverished nations, we wouldn't even scratch the surface. In fact, those 5 billion people would generate more than 1 to 2 million babies to replace the people we brought in.
And what type of people should we bring in? Just anyone - no matter what skills they have or lack thereof? I think you would agree that we should bring in the best and the brightest - right? Well, wouldn't the other 5 billion people be better off if we told the best and the brightest to stay home and improve the environments in their own countries to improve the lives of the 5 billion people left behind?
How generous our you, personally? Have you let 2 or 3 impoverished families move into your home? No!? Then why should you force it on everyone else?
That's not a bad idea. But the liberals will never allow it. "It's racist."
Worth trying. Making English-proficiency a condition of employment might do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.