Posted on 01/11/2004 5:09:34 PM PST by HAL9000
A British military doctor is backing claims that the cocktail of vaccines given to soldiers prior to the 1991 war in Iraq caused Gulf War Syndrome.Lieutenant Colonel Graham Howe has become the first expert to directly link the inoculations to severe health problems suffered by vaccinated troops.
For 13 years Britains Ministry of Defence as vigorously denied that vaccines could be blamed for the diseases.
Independent research has also failed to find conclusive proof of a common link between the vaccines and a Gulf War-related syndrome, a debilitating condition.
Lt Howe, clinical director of psychiatry with the British Forces Health Service in Germany, was asked by the War Pensions Agency to examine the case of former Lance-Corporal Alex Izett, who suffered from osteoporosis, which in turn led to depression.
The former Royal Engineer had inoculations prior to the conflict, which were not recorded on his medical documents because they had officially been classified as secret.
The doctor concluded that Mr Izzet did in fact receive classified secret injections prior to his expected deployment and that in turn these have most probably led to the development of autoimmune-induced osteoporosis.
Izett never went to Iraq and was not exposed to any other form of toxins,leaving no other possible cause for his illness.
His report also highlighted a high incidence of osteoporosis in Gulf War veterans and that the common denominator that links him to GW vets are the vaccinations he received prior to deployment.
Izett, who now lives in Bersenbruck, near Bremen in Germany, was inoculated like other troops against anthrax, botulism and other biological agents.
He said he went public with the doctors confidential report, dated September 22, 2001, so that other soldiers vaccinated with the same "secret" injections could claim compensation for the physical and mental illness they may have suffered as a result.
Last year a war pensions appeals tribunal awarded Izett a 50 per cent disability pension, based on the findings of Howe's report.
This has been my belief from day one.
While the individual vaccines are tested to ensure they are safe for humans, then never test how the vaccines will interact with each other inside the human body.
BETRAYAL!
FEDERAL JUDGE “FLIP-FLOPS” ON FORCED
ANTHRAX SHOTS – NOW SAYS ONLY THE SIX
PLANTIFFS IN LANDMARK SUIT ARE
COVERED – ALL OTHER U.S. MILITARY
CAN BE GUINEA-PIGGED AT WILL – WHO
GOT TO THE JUDGE? TOTAL REVERSAL
OF LOGIC – OUTRAGED READERS DECRY
BETRAYAL – “WE WILL CONTINUE THE
FIGHT,” SAYS LAWYER MARK ZAID
In a stunning reversal of a ruling he handed down just two weeks ago, a federal judge on Jan. 7 gave the government the “green light” to resume forced anthrax shots on this nation’s armed forces.
Last Dec. 22, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan decried the Pentagon’s demand that the “experimental” so-called anthrax “vaccine” be administered to all members of the military, on pain of court-martial or dismissal from the service.
Several thousand service-members have bravely refused the shots and suffered punishment, ranging from dishonorable discharge to prison terms, after declining to risk their health and that of family members. Others have died or been crippled for life after suffering severe reactions from the mandatory inoculations.
THE JUDGE DOES AN “ABOUT-FACE” ON JUSTICE
In Judge Sullivan’s former ruling, he used the term “guinea-pigging” to emphasize the Pentagon’s capricious attitude towards the safety and well-being of our armed forces.
Now the judge, who has performed one of the most shameful “flip-flops” in judicial history, doesn’t talk any more about “guinea-pigs” or the rights of Americans in uniform not to be the object of an experimental drug.
Sullivan cites a December 30 statement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that the “vaccine” works just fine and is no harm to anyone, as the basis for his shameful retreat from honor and justice.
TRUSTING THE GOVERNMENT TO TELL THE TRUTH
Oddly enough, the judge acknowledged he is “highly suspicious” of the “timing” of the FDA announcement, coming on the heels of his original order banning further use of the shots on troops without their informed consent.
But a government attorney told Sullivan he was prepared to “swear on a stack of Bibles” that the shots are “safe.” So the judge claimed that – and the FDA’s specious claim the vaccine was OK – was enough to reverse his order. Sure! That’s it.
Such “reasoning” is no comfort to the millions of Americans, who have waged a bitter and expensive battle against the anthrax shot $CAM, (see our related story: “GREED AND GUINEA PIGS” below) which has done more than anything else to undermine morale and retention in our military.
NO LOGIC IN REVERSAL OF POSITION
The judge now says only the six plaintiffs in the case are safe from being forced to take the shots. We at MilitaryCorruption.com wonder why suddenly, everyone else in uniform can be browbeaten into submitting to the inoculations, while six other Americans in the military are spared? There is no logic in what the judge has done. If the shots are a danger to six, why not others?
Hundreds of outraged e-mails have poured into our mailbox blasting Sullivan for his “flip-flop” and the government (and Bush Administration) for yet another “slap in the face” to the nation’s armed forces.
[Veterans who overwhelmingly supported Bush in the 2000 election were shocked and angered to find Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld “leading the charge” to maintain the unfair and illegal “disabled veterans tax” – based on the 100 year-old policy of Concurrent Receipt – whereby disabled vets lose one dollar from their retirement pension for ever dollar they receive in disability payments.]
With Judge Sullivan lifting the ban on forced shots, the government avoids the sticky question of what to do with all the service members whose lives were utterly destroyed by court-martial and loss of career when they stood up and said “NO” to being experimented on.
The Army, Navy, Marine and Air Force physicians who participated in this outrage – one notable exception being courageous Air Force Capt., Dr. John Buck – should have remembered and followed The Hippocratic Oath, sworn to by all doctors everywhere: “First, do no harm.”
READERS REACT – ATTORNEY VOWS TO “FIGHT ON”
“Put Sullivan’s name up there with Benedict Arnold, Brutus and Judas Iscariot,” said one angry Marine who e-mailed us from Camp Pendleton, Calif. “Who got to him?” asked a reader from Kirtland AFB in New Mexico. “This is doubly cruel,” said a female sailor from Norfolk, Va., “for Judge Sullivan gave us hope that justice might prevail.” And an Army lieutenant from Ft. Benning, Ga. wrote: “This latest development will only sink morale lower, if that is possible.”
Mark Zaid, lead attorney for the anti “forced anthrax shot” forces, vowed to try for a class action suit when he appears before Judge Sullivan next week.
“This is far from over,” he told MilitaryCorruption.com. “We will continue the fight no matter what.”
(EDITOR’S NOTE: It is impossible to individually answer all your e-mails on this very controversial decision by Judge Sullivan. May we suggest you take the time you would have used to write us, and instead send an e-mail or phone your congressman and senator and let them know what you think of this latest development and the Pentagon’s real motives for continuing the forced anthrax shot program? Thank you.)
I'm totally ignorant about vaccines, so I haven't favored one theory over another. This report is an interesting development.
I'm a bit skeptical of calling it proof based on one patient who was never in Iraq. Is it a valid proof statistically and epidemiologically?
Report: Gulf War Syndrome Linked to Vaccines
LONDON (Reuters) - A leaked British Army medical report has provided the first official backing that vaccines given to British soldiers before the 1991 Gulf War caused illnesses associated with Gulf War Syndrome, the Times reported on Monday.
It said Lieutenant-Colonel Graham Howe, clinical director of psychiatry with the British Forces Health Service in Germany, made the link after the War Pensions Agency asked him to look at the case of former Lance-Corporal Alex Izett, who now suffers from osteoporosis and acute depression, the paper said.
The Times quoted Howe as saying in his unpublished report, dated September 2001 and handed to the paper by Izett, that "secret" injections given to the soldier "most probably led to the development of autoimmune-induced osteoporosis."
Howe came to that conclusion because in the end Izett was never posted to Iraq, the Times said.
The paper added that Izett won a landmark ruling at a war pensions appeals tribunal last summer which awarded him a 50 percent disability pension.
The existence of Gulf War Syndrome and its possible causes have been hotly debated.
It has been linked variously to the inoculations the veterans received, pesticides they handled, smoke from oil-burning fires, stress and organophosphates -- chemicals that have been shown to affect the human nervous system.
U.S. and British veterans of the conflict have complained of symptoms such as respiratory and digestive problems, nerve damage, fatigue, pain, numbness and memory and psychological problems.
Irag War Syndrome? Nah, been there done that, I expect it'll be a little more snappy and imaginative.
That is a brilliant approach to the analysis, I've got to admit. But I would still like to see the numbers. Does he only have this one soldier? If so, he's got nothing. Or are there hundreds who got the shots but didn't go?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.