Posted on 01/10/2004 9:41:11 PM PST by Russ_Jowski
Biblical Scholar Howard Dean Declares People Perfect
By Russ Jowski
Dean didnt actually say people are perfect, but Democrats rarely express their true opinions. Dean said: From a religious point of view, if God had thought homosexuality is a sin, he would not have created gay people.
For the moment, lets ignore (as Dean apparently did), that the Bible calls homosexuality detestable or an abomination (depending on the translation) and that it explicitly states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Dean argues that because God created homosexuals, homosexuality cannot be a sin. It directly follows that because God created murderers, liars, adulterers, etc., that murder, lying, adultery, etc., cannot be sins.
Therefore, because all people were created by God, its impossible for them to sin. People are perfect. And if people are perfect, why does Dean need God?
Maybe because Vote for me, Im atheist, isnt the best way to campaign in a country where 92% of the population believes in God.
Some might argue that it is unfair to compare homosexuality to other sins because homosexuality is not a choice.
Despite the overwhelming evidence of people quitting homosexuality, as well as the new fad among teenage girls to become bisexual, the homosexual lobby maintains that homosexuality is not a choice.
Clearly, the only context in which liberals want to use the word choice is as part of their Orwellian term pro-choice which actually describes the ruthless slaughter of innocent children.
Dean continued: My view of Christianity . . . is that the hallmark of being a Christian is to reach out to people who have been left behind. So I think there was a religious aspect to my decision to support civil unions.
Dean later stated that his Christianity doesnt involve considering what Jesus would do. It seems that he has a similar view of Christianity as Bill Clinton (just substitute support civil unions for adulterous sodomy with an intern).
What else does Deans Christianity involve?
According to Dean it involves knowing much about the Bible. His spokesperson said, "He obviously has read the Bible and knows the passages fairly well. This statement is true if Clintonian definitions of obviously, knows, and fairly well, are used. (Remember: It depends on what the meaning of the word is is.)
Dean either defines obviously as not at all evident or knows as has no clue or fairly well as not at all. How else can he explain naming Job (whose ending Dean doesnt like) as his favorite New Testament book?
An hour later ample time for someone to inform him of his error he corrected himself, noting that Job is in the Old Testament. Again asked for his favorite New Testament book he answered, Anything in the Gospels. While the Gospels are in the New Testament, the last time that I checked no book in the New Testament was named anything in the Gospels.
Can Dean name a New Testament book? Can he even name any of the Gospels? Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are four of the most common names in America but Dean was unable to name any of them.
Deans defense? He doesnt want to pass on the impression that he has a theologian's knowledge of the Bible. As the New York Times put it, Dean did not mean to imply he was some kind of expert, (not that anyone considers the Times some kind of expert).
Another key aspect of Deans Christianity seems to be marrying a Jew and then having two Jewish children. Apparently Dean doesnt like the verse in the Bible that says Do not be yoked together with unbelievers or the verse that says a marriage partner must belong to the Lord.
Then there are Deans attempts to be Muslim and Jewish. In New Hampshire, Dean both invoked the Muslim phrase inshallah, meaning God willing, and threw a Hanukkah party for his staff in which he proudly chanted the blessing over the candles in well-accented Hebrew, according to our experts at the Times.
Deans Christianity also has an interesting use of church. According to the Washington Post: He rarely attends church services, unless it is for a political event.
It goes without saying that Deans Christianity is nothing more than an attempt to court Southern voters who he continuously alienates. These would be the ones with Confederate flags in their pick-up trucks who vote on the basis of guns, God and gays.
Unfortunately for Dean, he seems as apt at courting Southern voters as he is at understanding anything about Christianity.
Rank | Location | Receipts | Donors/Avg | Freepers/Avg | Monthlies | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
59 | Netherlands | 20.00 |
1 |
20.00 |
12 |
1.67 |
|
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
Yeah, and if God had thought child molesting was not a sin he wouldn't have created pedophiles.
Dean said: From a religious point of view, if God had thought homosexuality is a sin, he would not have created gay people.
When someone claims to speak for God, I take issue when what they speak contradicts God's own Word.
He opened himself up for this. He should be called on it, imo.
Not really. It just says that if gays don't sin by homosexual activities, other types must not sin by doing what they do either. The logical implication doesn't change according to how bad the other types are, but if it makes you more comfortable you can substitute people who become unreasonably angry when they get cut off in traffic.
then attacks Dean for marrying a Jew, and allegedly allowing his children to be raised as Jews.
There's a direct injunction against marrying unbelievers in the New Testament. If Dean were a sincere Christian, wouldn't he have cared what the Bible says about one of the most important decisions of his life? And wouldn't he have been more concerned with his children's spiritual well-being? Dean himself made his religion an issue.
To all democrats, Dean for president.
I certainly agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.