Skip to comments.
Katherine Harris Planning US Senate Run
Drudge ^
Posted on 01/08/2004 8:42:04 AM PST by Bush Cheney
Edited on 01/08/2004 11:40:39 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
Watch your makeup compact, Hillary, Florida's Katherine Harris may have her eyes on the United States Senate, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
MORE
Against the apparent wishes of senior Bush strategists, Harris has decided in her heart and mind that she will seek the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat, sources close to Harris tell DRUDGE.
"She wants it, wants it badly!" a top source said Thursday. "She'll make her decision public within the next week."
The source, who has daily contact with Harris, cautions the congresswoman still could hold back and not make the run, in deference to the president and his brother's wishes.
Sarasota County's GOP chairman, Tramm Hudson, said he spoke to Harris Tuesday night and that she seemed ready to run, according to reports. Harris continues to be one of the party's top fund-raisers.
Elsewhere, Texas Senator Kay Hutchison has reportedly advised her republican counterpart to "Go for it!"
If elected Harris would join a select group of women ever to serve in the United States Senate.
MORE Harris advisers dispel any notion that bad blood still runs in Florida over Harris's role in the 2000 election drama.
"Look, Governor Bush handily won re-election last year, after 2000, and the state's voters did not punish him," notes one top Harris strategist who asked not to be named.
"And they will not punish Katherine. The senate campaign will be on the issues, and electing the best person to represent Florida in the senate!"
Developing...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2004; electionussenate; katherineharris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 301-304 next last
To: ClintonBeGone
"Oh, and how exactly was it different?"You don't know?
241
posted on
01/08/2004 4:24:04 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Reagan regretted the 1986 amnesty legislation he signed into law. Bad policy. Bad decision. As time passed we all knew it wasn't working. It makes no sense at all, to repeat the same mistake again. Wouldn't you agree, Luis, or do you support amnesty and open borders too?
242
posted on
01/08/2004 4:31:20 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
>>>He's still doing a "doh!" slap in the head over calling Ronald Reagan an idiot.LOL You should know better Luis. Since you do support PresBush`s amnesty proposal... well, if the shoe fits.
243
posted on
01/08/2004 4:36:48 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: HostileTerritory
Hope for what?
244
posted on
01/08/2004 4:38:02 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
To: Luis Gonzalez
He's still doing a "doh!" slap in the head over calling Ronald Reagan an idiot.
LOL he's over in the corner like a dog licking his butt. :)
To: Luis Gonzalez
You don't know?
No, I was waiting to hear the rational and logical explaination from RM.
Comment #247 Removed by Moderator
To: Reagan Man
There is no amnesty, but yours is a textbook example of the propaganda techniques used by most leftists...a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth.
An Amnesty would not have a limit on the length of time these people would be allowed to remain here, but don't let the facts get in the way of your hysteria.
By the way, Reagan granted illegal aliens living in the U.S. an unconditional amnesty, are you saying that Reagan was an idiot?
248
posted on
01/08/2004 4:53:36 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: cooperjones
"Just do the right thing, Mr. Prez, and let the chips fall where they may."The right thing according to who?
I believe that he is doing the right thing.
249
posted on
01/08/2004 4:54:32 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Sloth
Milk does a body good.
250
posted on
01/08/2004 4:55:09 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: Bush Cheney; First_Salute
Seeing her certify the Florida election results in 2000 on TV and without comment was an emotional moment for me. The only sound was the scratching of the pen.
The rule of law in action.
251
posted on
01/08/2004 4:57:33 PM PST
by
snopercod
(Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
To: Luis Gonzalez
You're rhetoric is random crap.
First off, I'm no liberal, but since you do support the Bush proposal, I'd say you're showing your liberal or libertarian colors.
Secondly, PresBush is excusing an offense without exacting a penalty, by granting legal status to illegal aliens. That's called a pardon. Bush is the authority granting this pardon to a large group of individuals. That's called amnesty.
Your third point, I already answered.
I don't remember PresReagan coming out in support of PresBush`s proposal and for good reason.
252
posted on
01/08/2004 5:06:10 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: ClintonBeGone
Harris did very poorly in that district in that electoral climate. Harkening back to how Bush did in the same district in a Dem-leaning year in Florida is an irrelevancy and makes no point to support your argument. Governor Bush did considerably better than Harris there (same year, same voters). The fact the NRCC had to get involved to help her in that district doesn't say much for her campaign skills.
In a sense, I'd love to see Harris run and win concurrently with Bush in Florida. That'd certainly stick a needle in the eye of the liberals. But, it's not a very favorable scenario and not one I would risk.
To: Reagan Man
"I don't remember PresReagan coming out in support of PresBush`s proposal and for good reason." That's funny, don't know how to get out of this one, do you?
There are lots of people reading this thread, just chuckling at your spinning around the question here.
If anything can actually be said about the Bush proposal, is that it is more modest, and less generous than the Reagan amnesty, in fact, Bush's is not an amnesty at all.
You call people who support Bush's plan idiots, and wear the name of the man after who Bush crafted this idea.
Reagan granted amnesty, and people who support amnesty are idiots according to you, so, in your opinion, Reagan is an idiot, and you call yourself Reagan Man.
1+1=2
254
posted on
01/08/2004 5:18:53 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Republican Wildcat
You're late to the party little kitty. We've already had this discussion. Your point has been discredited and your opinion is wrong.
Comment #256 Removed by Moderator
To: ClintonBeGone
Your point has been discredited and your opinion is wrong. Not on this thread it hasn't been, if anywhere.
Choosing to ignore statistics doesn't mean they don't exist. Unless the numerical data was wrong, you haven't discredited anything. The facts are what they are.
To: snopercod
Not for those who had the misfortune of watching Dan Rather...from what I understand he was talking over it and saying "the votes are certified for Bush as the Republican secretary of state Katherine Harris sees it and decrees it."
To: Republican Wildcat
Apparently you feel you're entitled to your own set of facts. Is that a Kentucky thing? What was it that my hero Steve Spurrier said when the library at UK burned down? "Now what are they going to do with all those coloring books?"
To: ClintonBeGone
Ok. Go back to your boss at the Betty Caster campaign and tell her you need a more complete education on elections before she sends you again to do battle with adults. I realize this was in response to a remark you probably found to be innappropriate, but that aside, dismissing JohnnyZ's political analysis on this or other races as kids stuff is absurd. He knows his politics.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 301-304 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson