Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Grant's Infamy (Lincoln to Grant: "kicking the Jews out is wrong.")
Jewish Virtual Library ^ | Jewish Virtual Library

Posted on 01/07/2004 10:38:12 PM PST by gobucks

In 1862, in the heat of the Civil War, General Ulysses S. Grant initiated one of the most blatant official episodes of anti-Semitism in 19th-century American history. In December of that year, Grant issued his infamous General Order No. 11, which expelled all Jews from Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi:

The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department [the "Department of the Tennessee," an administrative district of the Union Army of occupation composed of Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi] within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.

Post commanders will see to it that all of this class of people be furnished passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters. No passes will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application of trade permits.

The immediate cause of the expulsion was the raging black market in Southern cotton. Although enemies in war, the North and South remained dependent on each other economically. Northern textile mills needed Southern cotton. The Union Army itself used Southern cotton in its tents and uniforms. Although the Union military command preferred an outright ban on trade, President Lincoln decided to allow limited trade in Southern cotton.

Ulysses S. Grant (Library of Congress photo) To control that trade, Lincoln insisted it be licensed by the Treasury Department and the army. As commander of the Department of the Tennessee, Grant was charged with issuing trade licenses in his area. As cotton prices soared in the North, unlicensed traders bribed Union officers to allow them to buy Southern cotton without a permit. As one exasperated correspondent told the Secretary of War, “Every colonel, captain or quartermaster is in a secret partnership with some operator in cotton; every soldier dreams of adding a bale of cotton to his monthly pay.”

In the fall of 1862, Grant's headquarters were besieged by merchants seeking trade permits. When Grant's own father appeared one day seeking trade licenses for a group of Cincinnati merchants, some of whom were Jews, Grant's frustration overflowed.

A handful of the illegal traders were Jews, although the great majority were not. In the emotional climate of the war zone, ancient prejudices flourished. The terms “Jew,” “profiteer,” “speculator” and “trader” were employed interchangeably. Union commanding General Henry W. Halleck linked “traitors and Jew peddlers.” Grant shared Halleck's mentality, describing “the Israelites” as “an intolerable nuisance.”

In November 1862, convinced that the black market in cotton was organized “mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders,” Grant ordered that “no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the railroad southward [into the Department of the Tennessee] from any point,” nor were they to be granted trade licenses. When illegal trading continued, Grant issued Order No. 11 on December 17, 1862.

Subordinates enforced the order at once in the area surrounding Grant's headquarters in Holly Springs, Mississippi. Some Jewish traders had to trudge 40 miles on foot to evacuate the area. In Paducah, Kentucky, military officials gave the town's 30 Jewish families—all long-term residents, none of them speculators and at least two of them Union Army veterans—24 hours to leave.

A group of Paducah's Jewish merchants, led by Cesar Kaskel, dispatched an indignant telegram to President Lincoln, condemning Grant's order as an “enormous outrage on all laws and humanity, ... the grossest violation of the Constitution and our rights as good citizens under it.” Jewish leaders organized protest rallies in St. Louis, Louisville and Cincinnati, and telegrams reached the White House from the Jewish communities of Chicago, New York and Philadelphia.

Cesar Kaskel arrived in Washington on Jan. 3, 1863, two days after the Emancipation Proclamation went into effect. There he conferred with influential Jewish Republican Adolphus Solomons, then went with a Cincinnati congressman, John A. Gurley, directly to the White House. Lincoln received them promptly and studied Kaskel's copies of General Order No. 11 and the specific order expelling Kaskel from Paducah. The President told Halleck to have Grant revoke General Order No. 11, which he did in the following message:

A paper purporting to be General Orders, No. 11, issued by you December 17, has been presented here. By its terms, it expells (sic) all Jews from your department. If such an order has been issued, it will be immediately revoked.

Grant revoked the order three days later.

0n January 6, a delegation led by Rabbi Isaac M. Wise of Cincinnati, called on Lincoln to express its gratitude that the order had been rescinded. Lincoln received them cordially expressed surprise that Grant had issued such a command and stated his conviction that “to condemn a class is, to say the least, to wrong the good with the bad.” He drew no distinction between Jew and Gentile, the president said, and would allow no American to be wronged because of his religious affiliation.

After the war, Grant transcended his anti-Semitic reputation. He carried the Jewish vote in the presidential election of 1868 and named several Jews to high office. But General Order No. 11 remains a blight on the military career of the general who saved the Union.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sources: American Jewish Historical Society and Karp, Abraham, From the Ends of the Earth: Judaic Treasures of the Library of Congress. DC: Library of Congress, 1991.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: civilwar; greatestpresident; jewishhistory; jewishtroops; lincoln; usgrant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Phil V.
Ah, a "campaign official"....my bad....thanks.
41 posted on 01/08/2004 7:45:13 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
And so was Nixon...yep, I don't see them all in a glowing light.
42 posted on 01/08/2004 7:48:16 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ahumblefan
Grant's loss rate was so severe that his army was repeatedly replinished with hapless draftees. The new drafts caused riots in the North.

Little understood fact. Lee's loss rate was even higher than Grant's. Check it out.

43 posted on 01/08/2004 7:58:56 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
"But it was okay for Grant to slaughter white Christian southerners, though, right?"

Misleading question. They weren't targeted for their Christianity. The other folks were targeted for their Jewishness.

Funny though, last time I checked, the Confederates fired first. Ever hear of Fort Sumpter?
44 posted on 01/08/2004 8:03:48 AM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
This story leaves out some important information. the author seems to have neglected the very basic process of checking the primary documents and correspondence related to the incident in question.

A cursory look at the Official Records of the War of the Rebellion will reveal a short but illustrative chain of correspondence regarding the banning of "Jews" in the military zone mentioned. At the time there was evidence that a group of merchants were purchasing cotton with gold, directly from disloyal planters and low level Confederate authorities and bribing ship captains to transport this cotton to the north. This violated military security and it was putting gold into the enemy's hands. The merchants involved in the questionable dealings were believed to be Jews but their exact identity and location were unknown (like most smugglers, they moved around a lot). The ban on their movement south was an apparent attempt to keep them from going north, cashing in their illegal shipments and returning with more gold for future business deals with the enemy.

I am not saying the policy was right but there was a lot more to this story than the article mentions.
45 posted on 01/08/2004 8:38:39 AM PST by XRdsRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev
As with most articles, true. However, I have not followed up on Grant's claims later he never even read the order he signed either.

But, I don't see the necessity....given his administration's rep, it would be consistent.

So, the article would have been more accurate, if I get your point, had it noted the perceived upside of Order 11: the sooner hard currency pathways to the South are dried up, the sooner the War is over.

However, I don't have a clue about the difference in currency mediums at the time for Black mkt/white mkt transactions. Now, of course, large scale white mkt transactions hardly ever use "hard" cash. For that matter, ditto for a goodly percentage of today's blk mkt.

But, back then, I don't have a frame of reference for how much "paper" substituted for gold for legal large scale commerce (but, I'm guessing it can't be that much different compared to today).
46 posted on 01/08/2004 8:55:35 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
I don't remember the exact details but I believe that all "approved" cotton transactions had to be made in a particular type of US Treasury Certificate with a fairly detailed set of receipts etc. I believe this was done to insure that the money going to planters only went to "Loyal" planters who could redeem the certificates with the proper paperwork.

Gold and any "cash" payment for cotton, I think was illegal in the eyes of the military authorities. Gold was in dire need in the Confederacy and US currency was widely accepted (and in many cases preferred) throughout the south, especially after 1862. The US Government/Military was doing all it could to keep gold and US money out of the Southern economy. Smugglers and profiteers caused them lots of problems throughout the war.
47 posted on 01/08/2004 9:05:55 AM PST by XRdsRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ditto; ahumblefan
The advent of the minnie ball meant any army taking the offensive against a determined foe was going to suffer high casualties.

I disagree that Grant "lost" most of his battles in Virginia. Although most were inconclusive, Grant kept pressing and Lee had to keep falling back to avoid being flanked. The result was the Army of Northern Virginia being bottled up in the seige of Richmond/Petersburg, depriving Lee of the freedom of maneuver he had used so brilliantly against his earlier foes. Then, it was only a matter of time for the ANV to collapse in light of the loss of the West and Sherman occupying the Southeast, steadily depriving Richmond of its sources of supply and manpower. McClellan could have done the same thing in 1862, but couldn't bring himself to do it.

48 posted on 01/08/2004 9:29:20 AM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev
"The merchants involved in the questionable dealings were believed to be Jews but their exact identity and location were unknown (like most smugglers, they moved around a lot)."

How about the people who were ordered kicked out of their homes, who unlike most smugglers, didn't move around a lot.
49 posted on 01/08/2004 10:04:51 AM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Grant was not slaughtering them over thier religion or heritage. The issue was one of politics. (Perhaps, you forgot who fired first?)
50 posted on 01/08/2004 10:07:17 AM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
Original documents and correspondence relating to Grant's expulsion order
51 posted on 01/08/2004 10:18:53 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
the Union wasnt occupying those three states already in 1862 were they? Especially Mississippi I would think.

The general order applied in those areas which had come under Union control. Memphis and Nashville were occupied early in 1862, and the Union controlled a large part of northern Mississippi. Kentucky was still officially a Union state.

52 posted on 01/08/2004 10:21:48 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Did Grant, like Hillary, ever refer to anyone as a F*****g Jew B*****d?

Sherman probably did. The O.R.W.R. contains many of Sherman's nasty comments about Jews, Catholics and Blacks, and since he had a reputation for using salty language, the O.R. comments are the polite ones.

53 posted on 01/08/2004 10:23:47 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Where is the largest only Jewish Military Cemetery outside of Israel?


54 posted on 01/08/2004 10:25:50 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
Jews in the Civil War
55 posted on 01/08/2004 10:28:23 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I was saying Grant wasn't near as anti-semitic as Europe is today! Sorry if I worded that wrong.
56 posted on 01/08/2004 10:30:15 PM PST by Fledermaus (We gave the Saudi terrorist VISA's, let's make them guest workers now also!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson