[Thisiswhoweare]

"...and let the chips fall where they will for four years"

Frankly, if we oppose Dean as hard as we opposed Clinton, we would probably pass less of the left wing agenda than Bush has.

Flame retardents at the ready.

(Tapping toes) No child left behind, largest birthweight bureaucracies ever (homeland security, drug benefit,etc), general hyperexpansion of the government...

[Diva Betsy Ross]

There is truth in that statement. As sad as it is to hear. Man, I really wanted to like this guy. President Bush has done a great job for us with the war, but what is left to betray us with domestically?

[PhiKapMom]

What was your screen name in 2000 when you opposed George W. Bush. You and some others are just proving our points -- you and your ilk never support Pres Bush.

Do you remember Executive Orders that Clinton passed? Well President Bush is not doing Executive Orders -- he is sending this to Congress for their action. What part of that do you not understand?

If you think we could take four years of Dean and his Executive Orders, think again. You want our military under a Howard Dean -- well I don't so you can take Dean wouldn't be so bad and stuff it.

As for the support against Clinton -- seems to me he appointed a lot of judges we are having problems with today, signed a lot of Executive Orders that we are having problems with today, sold our nuclear secrets -- you want me to go on. That support against Bill Clinton meant zero, zip, nada -- look at who he pardoned. Then his wife gets elected to the Senate.

Give us a break! If you want to support Dean, be honest enough to say you support Dean and take the heat for it but don't give me the spin Dean would be better than Bush crap!

[Tim Osman]

Frankly, if we oppose Dean as hard as we opposed Clinton, we would probably pass less of the left wing agenda than Bush has.

You are 100 percent correct.