Skip to comments.
Eighteen Illegal Alien solutions that are better than any Amnesty
January 7th, 2003
| Sabertooth
Posted on 01/07/2004 8:25:32 AM PST by Sabertooth
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-171 next last
To: mrsmith
To: Sabertooth
Great list! But there isn't a politician with the political will to carry it out. Bump
62
posted on
01/07/2004 10:22:31 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Cats know how we feel. They don't give a damn, but they know.)
To: AlBondigas
Thanks, that says foreigners can own 'property' that isn't in the restricted zones (the good areas).
'Property' would seem to include land.
63
posted on
01/07/2004 10:42:51 AM PST
by
mrsmith
To: Sabertooth
I liked Michael Savage's idea, which I thought went completely over Bill O'Reilly's head yesterday; namely,
most illegals, particularly those south of the border, come here for the jobs. Therefore, remove the jobs and you remove the incentive for that considerable subgroup of immigrants to come here. How? "Make" welfare recipients take those so-called undesirable jobs (which Americans are supposedly unwilling to take) by cutting them out of the welfare rolls. O'Reilly thinks this is tantamount slavery, which is ridiculous; each of us either has to work or starve.
Not looking for a fight or dissing anyone else's ideas. I just thought this was a good one, but maybe someone can talk me out of it.
To: Sabertooth
Well thought out & presented. After all the reading I have done I find the topic very conflicted - both ways.
You present great ideas and quite ideal. I did forward it around to my email list (I haven't been flamed lately).. :)
Thank you for sharing your ideas - they are good
65
posted on
01/07/2004 10:50:14 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
To: LibWhacker
great idea.. I have a quote on my profile page.. if someone can walk to the welfare office to pick up a check, they can walk TO A JOB!
66
posted on
01/07/2004 10:51:16 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
To: joesnuffy
WELL STATED JOE!
67
posted on
01/07/2004 10:52:52 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
To: Neets
HELP NEETS! I have so much to do & I have been captured by yet another FR thread.
:)
68
posted on
01/07/2004 10:53:42 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
To: TheDon
You are confusing ongoing illegal immigration with the large population of illegal aliens already in the country.No I'm not.
Even if you could stop illegal immigration 100%, you still have to deal with millions of illegal aliens in the country. Either of the solutions I mentioned would resolve that problem.
I don't think either of your solutions would help either problem. They have both been tried and they have both failed dismally.
69
posted on
01/07/2004 11:00:16 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
To: DollyCali
Back to work missy!!!
70
posted on
01/07/2004 11:01:08 AM PST
by
Neets
(Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex,)
To: Sabertooth
I like your ideas! The only thing I would add is a revision of the diversity visa lottery program to provide more review of applicants' backgrounds or to reduce the quotas from certain countries, especially those from terrorist-sponsoring countries. The DV lottery should not allow illegal aliens to participate.
The man who shot and killed several people near LAX's El Al counter on July 4, 2002, gained legal residence because his wife won the DV lottery.
71
posted on
01/07/2004 11:02:10 AM PST
by
heleny
(No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: TigersEye
So, if you have no further illegal immigration, and you deport all illegal aliens, that would not solve the problem with illegal aliens already in the country?
72
posted on
01/07/2004 11:02:54 AM PST
by
TheDon
(Have a Happy New Year!)
To: Sabertooth
Bump
Thanks Sabertooth - very best proposal I've seen yet. I'd like to plagerize it and send it to my congresspeople. Very well thought out solution!
Thanks again.
73
posted on
01/07/2004 11:07:03 AM PST
by
B-Cause
To: Sabertooth
I especially agree with the mexican ID card. We have this already it is called a PASSPORT!
To: TheDon
You are starting to flip flop. In
post #53 you said your two solutions, amnesty and deportation, could only solve one problem not both.
Perhaps you are confusing the problem of ongoing illegal immigration with that of existing illegal aliens? The solutions suggested in my post would certainly resolve the latter, but not the former.
Now in post #72 you ask if your solutions wouldn't solve both problems. Would you please stick to one theory at a time?
Your question supposes two accomplishments that are out of the question especially by means of your two solutions. The answer is that neither deportation nor sealing the borders can be accomplished as long as there is an incentive for people to come here.
75
posted on
01/07/2004 11:28:39 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
To: Sabertooth
add to list
- Eliminate notion of INS (aka USBCIS) as a customer service agency. INS is a border guard and need to scrutinize all applicants.
- Illegal Imigrant Advocacy groups should have their status to represent people before INS should be revoked immediatly.
- Any adocate (lawyer or non-lawyer) who files INS petitions soley as a means of obtaining delay to stay in the USA should be PERSONALLY liable for filing frivolous claims.
- All people who overstay their visa or have a deportation order outstanding shall have their name on the NCIC computer. It shall be prohibited for the INS to advise any law agency to simple release an in custody illegal.
- It will no longer be undocumented worker. Illegal aliens will be refered to as ILLEGAL ALIENS.
To: Joe Hadenuf
It's not part of their agenda, not part of their plan. Sadly their plan and agenda is to sell America down the tubes to save the party.
I can't and won't support any party that does that.
To: TigersEye
Now in post #72 you ask if your solutions wouldn't solve both problems. LOL! If you think that, then you have certainly misread my question. The question is not the complicated. Please reread it and respond, if you can. If you need further assistance understanding the question, I can try to clarify it for you.
78
posted on
01/07/2004 11:44:10 AM PST
by
TheDon
(Have a Happy New Year!)
To: Sabertooth
Troops on the borders and walls on the borders are examples of unrealistic, unnecessary, and counterproductive rhetorical overkill.Especially since a prospective illegal can apply for and receive a tourist visa and walk right through the border checkpoint with it.
To: TheDon
The answer is that neither deportation nor sealing the borders can be accomplished as long as there is an incentive for people to come here.
80
posted on
01/07/2004 11:45:08 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson