Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eighteen Illegal Alien solutions that are better than any Amnesty
January 7th, 2003 | Sabertooth

Posted on 01/07/2004 8:25:32 AM PST by Sabertooth

Well, today’s the big day, if the leaks and reports coming from the Bush Administration are true. The President is supposed to announce a new direction in America’s immigration policy that would result, among other things, in some sort of legalization for millions of the Illegal Aliens currently in our country, violating our laws. This, of course, would be nothing less than Amnesty by another name.

We’re told by handwringers and the political and media elites that there is really no workable solution to the Illegal Alien problem, so we might as well legalize them so we can get track of them. Thouughtless people on both sides of the debate jawbone about silly ideas like building a wall at the Mexican border, or house to house searches, as though they were viable solutions, or the only alternatives to Amnesty ore the status quo.

It’s disappointing, frankly. There is a great disconnect when people claim that while we can put men on the moon, or win the Cold War and the War on Terror, there is no reasonable or cost effective means of solving the Illegal Alien problem without infringing on the civil liberties of all Americans.

Nonsense, this nation is plenty capable of solving any problem we decide to solve, and poll after poll shows that the American people want the problem of Illegal Aliens solved, and that Amnesty isn’t a solution to us.

Dealing with Illegals doesn't have to be the enormous burden on resources many imagine, not would it have to infringe on civil liberties.

I've posted this on a few threads, but today seems like a good day for a revised reposting of as a stand-alone thread.

This problem is no harder to solve than wanting to solve it. We can get rid of Illegals rather effectively, by rolling up our sleeves and getting the Illegals to get rid of themselves.

The first order of business, of course, is to enforce existing laws on the books against Illegals and those who employ them. Also, politicians must be held to account when they pander otherwise.

Then...

The list above is by no means comprehensive, and can be adopted piecemeal or in a single package. That said, incrementalism is probably going to be the way to go, especially politically.

These measures would provide a little carrot and lots of stick for Illegals already here to get themselves out. Some of them will need to be tested in the courts, which is another reason to adopt them piecemeal, so that an injunction against omnibus legislation can't stall the whole effort.

We ought to be looking initially at easy, politically safe legislation, like the new accounting for family reunification, Border Security/IRS cooperation, English speaking citizenship requirements, and a few others. Our politicians are a trembling, timid bunch, and need to gain a little self-confidence before they'll tackle more difficult issues.

Note a few things that aren't on my list: troops or walls on the border. I think they are a futile diversion from cost effective solutions. The best possible wall at the border is to let foreigners know that we respect our sovereignty, and they had best do the same.

Note that their are no house to house searches.

Note also that I don't call for an immigration moratorium, though others may. I think their position is within the respectable mainstream of a dialogue about immigration, and while it's possible that I might change my mind later, but I am not currently persuaded that an outright moratorium is or will be necessary.

The main problem is multimillion-strong mass of Illegals, and the secondary problem is how we currently select legal immigrants for rapid assimilation into American society. I believe my proposals adequately address both situations, but there is certainly room for debate on the back end.

Note also that I have a guest worker program that is actually honest and responsible, and not an Amnesty by another name. My program would ensure that law-abiding foreigners are background-checked before entry, rather than rewarding lawbreaking Illegals after the fact.

All of the above could be adopted while allowing politicians so-inclined to chant the "compassionate conservatism" mantra.

A few final thoughts...

My proposals will cost money and require an expansion of the federal government in certain areas. However, this expense and expansion is all well within the legitimate, Constitutional responsibilities of the federal government. There will be a greater expense initially, as we ramp up to deal with the backlog of Illegals, but a number of my proposals are at least partially self-funding. Also, success in these endeavors will eventually reduce the need for them, and as many Illegals would leave on their own. There will be future savings, it should be noted, as the population of Illegals is dwindles and their net drain on our resources is reduced.

In contrast, there would be also be an increased expense and expansion of the government if there is an Amnesty, as checking backgrounds and processing 8 to 12 million Illegals wouldn't be cheap. However, such increases and expansions would only serve to reward the lawlessness of Illegals and the cowardice of politicians, thereby encouraging more of the same in both, unless there were also enforcement proposals like mine in effect for the American Interior.

But, if we strengthened and enforced our laws consistently within our borders, then we don't need the phantom solution of Amnesty anyway.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; illegalaliens; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-171 next last
To: mrsmith
To clarify: Buying land in Mexico
61 posted on 01/07/2004 10:18:29 AM PST by AlBondigas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Great list! But there isn't a politician with the political will to carry it out. Bump
62 posted on 01/07/2004 10:22:31 AM PST by SAMWolf (Cats know how we feel. They don't give a damn, but they know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlBondigas
Thanks, that says foreigners can own 'property' that isn't in the restricted zones (the good areas).
'Property' would seem to include land.
63 posted on 01/07/2004 10:42:51 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I liked Michael Savage's idea, which I thought went completely over Bill O'Reilly's head yesterday; namely, most illegals, particularly those south of the border, come here for the jobs. Therefore, remove the jobs and you remove the incentive for that considerable subgroup of immigrants to come here. How? "Make" welfare recipients take those so-called undesirable jobs (which Americans are supposedly unwilling to take) by cutting them out of the welfare rolls. O'Reilly thinks this is tantamount slavery, which is ridiculous; each of us either has to work or starve.

Not looking for a fight or dissing anyone else's ideas. I just thought this was a good one, but maybe someone can talk me out of it.

64 posted on 01/07/2004 10:49:29 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Well thought out & presented. After all the reading I have done I find the topic very conflicted - both ways.

You present great ideas and quite ideal. I did forward it around to my email list (I haven't been flamed lately).. :)

Thank you for sharing your ideas - they are good
65 posted on 01/07/2004 10:50:14 AM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
great idea.. I have a quote on my profile page.. if someone can walk to the welfare office to pick up a check, they can walk TO A JOB!
66 posted on 01/07/2004 10:51:16 AM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
WELL STATED JOE!
67 posted on 01/07/2004 10:52:52 AM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Neets
HELP NEETS! I have so much to do & I have been captured by yet another FR thread.

:)
68 posted on 01/07/2004 10:53:42 AM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
You are confusing ongoing illegal immigration with the large population of illegal aliens already in the country.

No I'm not.

Even if you could stop illegal immigration 100%, you still have to deal with millions of illegal aliens in the country. Either of the solutions I mentioned would resolve that problem.

I don't think either of your solutions would help either problem. They have both been tried and they have both failed dismally.

69 posted on 01/07/2004 11:00:16 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali
Back to work missy!!!
70 posted on 01/07/2004 11:01:08 AM PST by Neets (Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex, Sex,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I like your ideas! The only thing I would add is a revision of the diversity visa lottery program to provide more review of applicants' backgrounds or to reduce the quotas from certain countries, especially those from terrorist-sponsoring countries. The DV lottery should not allow illegal aliens to participate.

The man who shot and killed several people near LAX's El Al counter on July 4, 2002, gained legal residence because his wife won the DV lottery.

71 posted on 01/07/2004 11:02:10 AM PST by heleny (No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
So, if you have no further illegal immigration, and you deport all illegal aliens, that would not solve the problem with illegal aliens already in the country?
72 posted on 01/07/2004 11:02:54 AM PST by TheDon (Have a Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Bump

Thanks Sabertooth - very best proposal I've seen yet. I'd like to plagerize it and send it to my congresspeople. Very well thought out solution!

Thanks again.

73 posted on 01/07/2004 11:07:03 AM PST by B-Cause
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I especially agree with the mexican ID card. We have this already it is called a PASSPORT!

74 posted on 01/07/2004 11:14:54 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
You are starting to flip flop. In post #53 you said your two solutions, amnesty and deportation, could only solve one problem not both.

Perhaps you are confusing the problem of ongoing illegal immigration with that of existing illegal aliens? The solutions suggested in my post would certainly resolve the latter, but not the former.

Now in post #72 you ask if your solutions wouldn't solve both problems. Would you please stick to one theory at a time?

Your question supposes two accomplishments that are out of the question especially by means of your two solutions. The answer is that neither deportation nor sealing the borders can be accomplished as long as there is an incentive for people to come here.

75 posted on 01/07/2004 11:28:39 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
add to list

- Eliminate notion of INS (aka USBCIS) as a customer service agency. INS is a border guard and need to scrutinize all applicants.

- Illegal Imigrant Advocacy groups should have their status to represent people before INS should be revoked immediatly.

- Any adocate (lawyer or non-lawyer) who files INS petitions soley as a means of obtaining delay to stay in the USA should be PERSONALLY liable for filing frivolous claims.

- All people who overstay their visa or have a deportation order outstanding shall have their name on the NCIC computer. It shall be prohibited for the INS to advise any law agency to simple release an in custody illegal.

- It will no longer be undocumented worker. Illegal aliens will be refered to as ILLEGAL ALIENS.

76 posted on 01/07/2004 11:30:49 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
It's not part of their agenda, not part of their plan.

Sadly their plan and agenda is to sell America down the tubes to save the party.

I can't and won't support any party that does that.

77 posted on 01/07/2004 11:33:15 AM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Now in post #72 you ask if your solutions wouldn't solve both problems.

LOL! If you think that, then you have certainly misread my question. The question is not the complicated. Please reread it and respond, if you can. If you need further assistance understanding the question, I can try to clarify it for you.

78 posted on 01/07/2004 11:44:10 AM PST by TheDon (Have a Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Troops on the borders and walls on the borders are examples of unrealistic, unnecessary, and counterproductive rhetorical overkill.

Especially since a prospective illegal can apply for and receive a tourist visa and walk right through the border checkpoint with it.

79 posted on 01/07/2004 11:44:42 AM PST by Pa' fuera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The answer is that neither deportation nor sealing the borders can be accomplished as long as there is an incentive for people to come here.
80 posted on 01/07/2004 11:45:08 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson