Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Laura Schlessinger: 'The Proper Care And Feeding Of Husbands'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, January 6, 2004 | Dr. Laura Schlessinger

Posted on 01/06/2004 12:06:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2

'The Proper Care And Feeding Of Husbands'

Posted: January 6, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Why did you write this book aiming at the women – aren't both responsible for the quality of the marriage?

Of course! However, women are in the unique position of having an extraordinary amount of influence over their husbands, which when exercised thoughtfully, compassionately, lovingly and intelligently results in a happier husband who will "swim through shark infested waters to bring her a lemonade."

Women seem not to understand, or underestimate, the profound power they have over their husbands. Men are very emotionally dependent upon women from the day they are born to the day they expire. This book teaches women to use this power benevolently – which will definitely result in them being happier with life and love.

What are the most common complaints men have about their wives?

What are husbands' most important needs?

What is the No. 1 worst mistake women make with respect to being happy in their marriages?

They marinate in negatives. It is typical of women to fester and ferment over disappointments, slights, annoyances, angers, etc. Women, more typically than men, will go over it ad infinitum in the own heads, with their mothers, sisters, friends, co-workers, neighbors, social groups (remember Jerry McGuire?) – in doing so they reinforce the negative and create a bad attitude – one which turns into entitlement for not being particularly nice.

Attitude is about believing that your mate has your best interests at heart – it is about not letting loving feelings be squelched by everyday annoyances and disappointments; it is about benefit of the doubt; it is about cherishing the moments and living for the well-being of the other and being sustained by the joy of giving and the blessing of receiving in return.

All through the book you say "men are simple" ... isn't that an insult?

Not at all! In fact, most all of the many hundreds of responses I received from men in preparing this book confirmed just that: "Men are only interested in two things: If I'm not horny, make me a sandwich," and "As a man, I can tell you our needs are simple. We want to be fed, we want our kids mothered, and we want lovin'."

What about sex? Are wives obligated to give their husbands sex on demand?

As a woman who happens to believe that orgasms are a fabulous gift and blessing from God, I am amazed at how many women callers are willing to give them up to the gods of "I'm tired," or "I'm annoyed." Now, anyone cannot be in the mood from time to time – that's natural. However, the denigration of male sexual needs (They are just animals) and the use of sex to punish or control (You didn't do what I wanted) and inappropriate prioritizing (My work and children take all my energy) are self-centered and self-defeating.

I ask my women callers who complain that their husbands are not happy with virtually no sexual intimacy (and, by the way, that's what the men truly feel about sex with their wives – it's the ultimate in "acceptance and approval" for them) if they would be satisfied with that profound a rejection and dismissal. They always say, "No, I guess not." Frankly, too many women treat their husbands as accessories instead of priorities.

Are there any marital situations for which your book does not apply?

Yes, most definitely. Where the behavior of the husbands is blatantly destructive, dangerous or evil, this book does not apply.

However, these ideas and techniques have salvaged and revitalized innumerable strained, stagnant, boring, disappointing, annoying, frustrating and even seemingly dead marriages. When I nag a woman caller to try just one simple behavior for one day, I inevitably get the call back that they are amazed at the difference a day made.

Are you going to write the book for men on the proper care and feeding of wives?

Nope. Men are born of women and between girlfriends and then a wife; men spend their entire lives in the tutelage of women. What women accept or reject is largely the guiding force for what men will and won't do. When they are treated with the Three A's, they naturally, and in gratitude and affection, give their women the attention, regard, respect, support and love they want.

The ideas and techniques in this book are simple and sweet. What a blessing for women to know that they largely control their own happiness! My job is to get their prejudices and bad attitudes out of their own way. Transforming your guy into a loving man is its own reward.





TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; drlaura; propercare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-711 next last
To: Marie
Humbled by your saying so.

As I've told many clients . . . either I did it, my family members did it, my friends or associates did it or my family's poor white trash renters did it or it probably wasn't done.

Been there and done that learning a lot of things the hard way--PLUS all the education and Navy experiences etc.

Bless you for your kind words. Much, much appreciated. I don't always know if typing allt his much stuff is worth it to anyone or not.

Have a blessed NEW YEAR! with each of your loved ones!
461 posted on 01/06/2004 11:45:04 PM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
Would be happy to. But running out of gas tonight.

Will try to, tomorrow.

Basically, a child looks to the parent for love, affection, care, protection. When it's not there or not there sufficiently in quality and quantity, then a lot of destructive mind sets, reflexes, compensations get built in at an early age. These end up really fouling up future relationships wholesale until they are worked through.
462 posted on 01/06/2004 11:47:48 PM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Of course any model will be flawed because people are so complex and relationships are so complex and people are so idiosyncratically unique. That's another reason I pray and go with my intuition rather than a formula from a list of models.

Personally, I've found a strong background in C.S. Lewis of more value than any other window of insight. But of course, subjectives don't prove much.

463 posted on 01/07/2004 12:03:25 AM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
If I'm not horny, make me a sandwich.

I've never been of the mind to add one of those neat inspirational taglines to my emails or here at FR but this one is priceless.

As well as this one I also encountered today.

Some people are like Slinkies . . not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.

464 posted on 01/07/2004 12:04:32 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
YES. I LOVE LEWIS.

But he COULD BE until Joy, a bit stiff and formal and not as approachable in tone as I'd prefer.

But his human insights were priceless.
465 posted on 01/07/2004 12:06:45 AM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Eph.5

[22] Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
[23] For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
[24] Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
[25] Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
[26] That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
[27] That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
[28] So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
[29] For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
[30] For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
[31] For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
[32] This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
[33] Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

The best place to go for marital advice.

Strike that...The best place to go for life.

466 posted on 01/07/2004 12:26:14 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Basically, a child looks to the parent for love, affection, care, protection. When it's not there or not there sufficiently in quality and quantity, then a lot of destructive mind sets, reflexes, compensations get built in at an early age. These end up really fouling up future relationships wholesale until they are worked through.

Makes a lot of sense in some familiar circumstance. One reason I refuse to give up corporal punishment in leu of the time-out / ostratization method is because of what I consider the byzantine emotional arm-twisting it requires to maintain order when used exclusively. A warm bottom is easier to get over than a cold scowl.

467 posted on 01/07/2004 12:43:44 AM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: freedox
So perfect.
468 posted on 01/07/2004 1:07:03 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Now they are too busy competing with men in the work place...

If a couple is working for and towards the same goals there is no competetion only contribution.

Having said that if a woman is more successful than the man or he is blue collar and she is white collar then there can be some real self-esteem issues for him or some real 'I married below myself' issues for her.

469 posted on 01/07/2004 1:21:41 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I strongly disagree. I think she does more men more good than a long list of male stars on the radio.

May be, but for me, it's not the message - it's the messenger.

She treats male callers with disdain and contempt. She is way more condescending toward men than she is toward women.

Laura Schlessinger, when it comes to hating men, is no different than Hillary Clinton, she's just smoother in her delivery. And, like Hillary, I can't listen to her.

470 posted on 01/07/2004 2:58:44 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Neets

;-)


471 posted on 01/07/2004 3:36:36 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru
"My wife is fine, but her brother is an absolute moron. He just left after a visit, and I had to hear him pontificate about when we fight terrorists we become our own worst enemies. I couldn't help it, I just had to tell him that he was woefully misinformed and not capable of making moral judgments as, along with much of the country, he does not believe there is a GOOD and an EVIL. Needless to say, his visit did not end on a positive note."

Sounds like my Sister-in-law. She wants anybody but Bush because he "had a C-average" in college. She went ballistic when i told her the Goron flunked out of divinity school ;-).

Listen to your tagline.

472 posted on 01/07/2004 3:42:27 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
"One of those horse-faced harridans..."

Stop talking about Medea Benjamin like that ;-).

473 posted on 01/07/2004 3:50:43 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
...when we fight terrorists we become our own worst enemies...

Heaven save us from playskool gurus.

474 posted on 01/07/2004 3:59:50 AM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; Z in Oregon
I saw her talking about it on Fox this morning.
475 posted on 01/07/2004 4:09:01 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bootless; Lazamataz
He'll steal your tagline too. He is demented.
476 posted on 01/07/2004 4:44:48 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Lazamataz sells Conspiracy Guy's taglines to trolls. Trolls buy them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
I saw Dr. Laura. She is probably 95% correct on this one. I know because she put the finger on feelings I often have with my significant other that sometimesd can't be put into words but are certainly there. As far as brother-in-law, screw him, he is ignorant, uninformed, and yes - DANGEROUS - to your health. Ask him if he would be willing to put a sign on his front lawn "THIS IS A GUN FREE HOME"? Then ask him if not, why not? Then ask him whether as a country we should do the same thing. That should put him in his place as an idiot.
477 posted on 01/07/2004 5:02:01 AM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
I saw Dr. Laura. She is probably 95% correct on this one. I know because she put the finger on feelings I often have with my significant other that sometimesd can't be put into words but are certainly there. As far as brother-in-law, screw him, he is ignorant, uninformed, and yes - DANGEROUS - to your health. Ask him if he would be willing to put a sign on his front lawn "THIS IS A GUN FREE HOME"? Then ask him if not, why not? Then ask him whether as a country we should do the same thing. That should put him in his place as an idiot.
478 posted on 01/07/2004 5:04:00 AM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Every wife I have ever spoken with face to face has said the same thing: "He wants sex too much and too often." They don't say he is bad at it. They insist they enjoy it. Just not as often as her husband. Ask them how often they have sex and it is usually once or twice a month and then only because her husband badgers her into it. Ask her when the last time she actually initiated sex and you find that it is usually at six month intervals and then only for some reason other than the sex itself.

My point is not to brag (as if I had any idea of the cause!) but to say that there are MANY exceptions to this pattern. The simple fact is that my wife INITIATES constantly. If you were actually doing a research project I would put you in touch with her.

But if you filter out all the contradictory data points you hear about (oh, that's just "internet fiction") then you will always just fulfill your own prophecies.

I'm sure there are many relationships which could be posted on this thread alone which deviate from your experience.

479 posted on 01/07/2004 5:14:23 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna; hellinahandcart
LOL!
480 posted on 01/07/2004 5:24:06 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-711 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson