Skip to comments.
Accused Terrorist Wrote School Guidelines with ACLU
BlessedCause ^
| 1/5/04
| Jen Shroder
Posted on 01/05/2004 12:51:41 PM PST by jent
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: sarasota
Yawn........anyone surprised?
21
posted on
01/05/2004 2:35:33 PM PST
by
TaxPayer2000
(The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
To: jent
bump
To: jent
why do they even bother trying to terrorize us when they can just infiltrate from within. their goal is to turn us all into islamic fanatics, right?
23
posted on
01/05/2004 2:49:42 PM PST
by
ecru
To: ravingnutter
I have no brief pro or con on the guidelines, but if you Google "guidelines on Religious expression in public schools", you will find them posted on the web sites of the Christian Legal Association, American Center for Law and Justice and Focus on the Family, either neutrally or favorably. As I remember the coverage at the time, these particular guidelines in fact supported individual student expression, as against teachers who wanted to confiscate Bibles, etc.
I'd recommend reading the full guidelines and deciding for yourself.
http://www.aclj.org/ussc/add_info/doe_religious_expression.asp
To: jent
Additionally, Clinton went beyond the ACLU copyright guidelines and added: "Students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices."
Pay attention. There went religious freedom.
What happened to their cries for separation of church and state? Can this ACLU/Clintoon guideline not be used to allow Christian teachings in school as well?
To: BohDaThone
I'd recommend reading the full guidelines and deciding for yourself. Now you're just being silly......
26
posted on
01/05/2004 4:37:17 PM PST
by
gdani
(Have you played Atari today?)
To: NavySEAL F-16
27
posted on
01/05/2004 7:37:15 PM PST
by
ladylib
To: Papabear47
They protested, what rights were lost? They weren't allowed to get close enough to cause security problems.
To: Calpernia
Book mark bump. Thx Cal.
29
posted on
01/05/2004 9:40:28 PM PST
by
Kudsman
(LIE= ""We have to exert all of our efforts militarily" Hillary Nov. 2003)
To: KingofQue
I understand keeping dangerous people away from the President however were I desirous of causing him harm a protest sign would avail me naught,rather that I should bear a Pro-Bush slogan and the means to do him harm.We blind ourselves to the obvious ....Not all terrorists are incompetent fools incapable of masquerading as decent people to preform there despicable acts.
What can we do to prevent another President Reagan assassination attempt.I do not have the answer other than to keep the President away from the general population.A truly dedicated individual or group seeking to do harm to anyone would present an almost insurmountable security problem.
To: Born Conservative
Pinging you to an older story for your public school ping list.
31
posted on
06/10/2004 6:08:34 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(When you bite the hand that feeds you, you eventually run out of food.)
To: kenth; CatoRenasci; Marie; PureSolace; Congressman Billybob; P.O.E.; jcb8199; cupcakes; Amelia; ...
32
posted on
06/10/2004 7:12:33 AM PDT
by
Born Conservative
("Nothing wrong with shooting as long as the right people get shot" - Dirty Harry)
To: Calpernia
""Students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices.""
Huh??
33
posted on
04/22/2005 12:05:44 AM PDT
by
international american
(Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: jent
34
posted on
04/22/2005 12:07:37 AM PDT
by
AnimalLover
( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
To: international american
Do you remember recently, I think it was Kentucky? Kansas? Some students were being forced to attend classes to teach tolerance on homosexuality?
I believe that statement you just quoted would cover that.
35
posted on
04/22/2005 2:49:03 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: jent
36
posted on
10/23/2005 7:18:09 AM PDT
by
ViLaLuz
(Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
To: Born Conservative
Please keep me on your ping list. The children are the future of this country and the libs know it. All the information we can gather with the election coming up in 08 will be essential in the battle to protect our children.
37
posted on
12/24/2005 9:54:01 AM PST
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: Cindy; Fedora
Abdurahman Alamoudi, President of the American Muslim Council, supporter of Hamas, Hezbollah and accused of ties with Osama bin Laden, helped develop "Religious Expression in Public School" with the ACLU which holds the copyright. Launched by Clinton in 1995, these "Presidential Guidelines" greatly impact public schools today.
38
posted on
08/30/2006 9:24:35 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: piasa
I see this thread just has the generic url, let's post the article url for this archive:
http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Abdurahman%20Alamoudi.htm
"Accused Terrorist
Wrote School Guidelines with ACLU
WHY Prayer to Allah is OK in Public School"
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "[Much of this post researched and confirmed by Wes Vernon of NewsMax, over 23 references linked below]"
39
posted on
08/30/2006 9:42:34 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: piasa
40
posted on
08/30/2006 10:12:02 PM PDT
by
Cindy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson