Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Crikey,' Steve Irwin's baby in croc shocker -
Herald Sun - Australia ^ | January 3, 2003 | Christine Caulfield

Posted on 01/02/2004 11:49:58 AM PST by UnklGene

'Crikey,' Steve Irwin's baby in a croc shocker -

Christine Caulfield - 03jan04

STEVE Irwin sparked outrage yesterday when he held his baby son a metre from the mouth of a crocodile at his Queensland zoo.

Child advocates branded the Crocodile Hunter reckless for holding one-month-old Bob while feeding the giant crocodile a dead chicken. Wife Terri looked on as Irwin then "walked" Bob to the crocodile pool at his Sunshine Coast wildlife park as the 4m reptile, named Murray, lurked nearby.

Irwin defended the stunt, saying the baby was never in danger.

"This kid has to grow up to be croc savvy," he told the Herald Sun.

"I guess what I am doing is teaching him to be completely familiar with crocodiles . . . There's no way known I would ever endanger my child."

But Irwin -- recently named Queenslander of the year -- now faces possible investigation by Queensland police, the Department of Families, and workplace safety officers.

The stunt was slammed by child support groups and likened to the furore caused by pop star Michael Jackson when he dangled his newborn baby over a balcony at a hotel in Germany in 2002.

Childhood Foundation chief Joe Tucci described Irwin's actions as outrageous.

"It's neglect, it's reckless, it's a form of endangerment," he said.

"I don't think we should use children as props, and definitely not in situations that are going to put them in such danger."

Mr Tucci said Irwin could faces criminal charges if he continued to put his baby in harm's way.

"He wasn't thinking about the risks to his child. Children need adults to protect them. They should not be involved in any kind of entertainment that puts them at risk," he said.

"Kids under five are unpredictable. It's only one small slip away from a bad accident. He can make his own choices, but his child can't."

Australian Family Association spokesman Bill Muehlenberg said Irwin's conduct was tantamount to child abuse.

Mr Muehlenberg said Irwin had no right to put his baby in peril.

"Most parents would cringe at the sight of such things. One slip, one fall and he is the crocodile's lunch," he said.

Yesterday's show, for the public and the media, was billed as Bob's "croc-feeding debut".

"Good boy, Bob," Irwin said as Murray's jaws snapped shut on the food.

"He's one month old, so it's about time Bob got out there and did his first croc demo," Irwin told the excited crowd.

Irwin later told the Herald Sun: "If I had known it was going to cause a ruckus I would have thrown them (the media) out by their ears.

"I was in complete control of the crocodile. Robert was tucked right in my arm. It is far more dangerous to pack your kid up and go out on the road."

Irwin's wife Terri backed Bob's place in the show.

"When I put him back in the pram he had big eyes and he was smiling and it was a wonderful sensory experience for him. He dug it," she said.

Queensland Families Minister Judy Spence said she would request the unedited video tapes of the incident.

"I have seen the television footage and while I have no doubt the Irwins love their children very much, I believe it was an error of judgment to place a baby in a potentially dangerous situation," Ms Spence said.

"The department is interested in examining all of the information including a copy of the unedited video and the safety precautions and protocols Mr Irwin was following."

Queensland Police confirmed last night they had received complaints from the public about the incident.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crocodile; zoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2004 11:49:58 AM PST by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
'Crikey,' Steve. You're going to be called a 'Wacko-Jacko'
from down-under!
2 posted on 01/02/2004 11:52:10 AM PST by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
I just saw this on my local news and I was horrified. The guy is an idiot and if the baby's mother approved this she is one also.
3 posted on 01/02/2004 11:53:52 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Irwin comes across as a wholesome family man...far from wacko.

He may even be a conservative, having been invited to Pres. Bush's BBQ last time he was in Australia.

Maybe this is why the media's after him.

4 posted on 01/02/2004 11:54:22 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Not too bright.
5 posted on 01/02/2004 11:54:49 AM PST by lormand (Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
No, people are after him because he put his baby in danger. Wild animals are just that - wild. You can have a wild animal that works well with you for years, and then goes nuts for reasons you did not guess.
6 posted on 01/02/2004 11:56:12 AM PST by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Agreed but. If you want to return to the days of manly men and true individual freedom, non interference in families, and what not, then you can't cart someone off to jail for the life they choose for their family to lead. Having said all that, my own greatest paranoid-level nightmare is the possibility of mistakenly causing my child any harm. I think Steve crossed the line by believing in his own invincibility.
7 posted on 01/02/2004 12:01:16 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
There's another thread on this topic here.

I found this quote interesting:

Irwin later told the Herald Sun: "If I had known it was going to cause a ruckus I would have thrown them (the media) out by their ears.

No criminal wants witnesses around, especially when they're carrying cameras and video equipment. Not that Steve Irwin is a criminal, just incredibly foolish in his exposing his own infant child to such a risk.

8 posted on 01/02/2004 12:01:38 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Meddle not in the affairs of crocodiles, for you are crunchy and good with catsup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
But Irwin -- recently named Queenslander of the year -- now faces possible investigation by Queensland police, the Department of Families, and workplace safety officers.

He's a dead man walking since being made Queenslander of the Year. They made "Crocodile Dundee" Australian of the year and then the next year they hunted him down and assasinated him.

So9

9 posted on 01/02/2004 12:05:07 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LPStar
Statistically speaking, the chances of harm coming to the kid are probably 1 in 100,000 or more based on the lightening-fast instincts of the father and his 40 or so years of experience without having coming to harm in multitudes of episodes.

However, yes, there is the outside chance an unforeseen event could take place...I grant you that.

10 posted on 01/02/2004 12:19:36 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Odds are, they're nature worshippers.
11 posted on 01/02/2004 12:20:42 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LPStar
First answer to those who say he knows the Croc, is an expert is Roy thought he knew his tigers.
12 posted on 01/02/2004 12:23:01 PM PST by sharkhawk (I want to go to St. Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Horrifying is the only word to describe this scene.
13 posted on 01/02/2004 12:23:08 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
They don't strike me that way, but I don't know for sure.
14 posted on 01/02/2004 12:25:28 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: what's up
He may even be a conservative, having been invited to Pres. Bush's BBQ last time he was in Australia.

Maybe this is why the media's after him.

Or, it could be because he dangled his newborn baby IN FRONT OF A CROCODILE!!!!!!!

15 posted on 01/02/2004 12:25:50 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
Did he dangle it in front of the croc? I hadn't heard that.

Now that would be wacko-jacko behavior.

16 posted on 01/02/2004 12:27:53 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: what's up
However, yes, there is the outside chance an unforeseen event could take place...I grant you that.

They could have been hit by lightening. A tree might have falled on them. His wife might have had a brain tumor and suddenly had the urge to throw the child into the crocs mouth after Irwin handed the child to her. A huge meteor could have fallen on everyone there and killed them.

It's also possible that Steve Irwin had planned on driving somewhere with the child and that they both would have died in a car accident except that Irwin decided to feed the croc with the child.

The bottom line is that nothing happened. So what's the big deal.

If this thing with Steve Irwin is so fantastic when nothing happened then Tom Hamilton should be thrown in jail for letting his daughter surf around sharks. /sarcasm off

17 posted on 01/02/2004 12:28:06 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Saw this on CNN. Sheeeeesh! After the crock jumped and chomped on the dead chicken, Daddy did a funny walking routine with the baby right into the crock's dirty water. Unbelievable.
18 posted on 01/02/2004 12:29:58 PM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
After watching Steve Irwin many times I suspect the child would be in more danger of choking on his breakfast than coming to harm in his father's arms around a croc.

This may be a bit of a stretch, but I'm sure you get my point.

19 posted on 01/02/2004 12:33:53 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Did you see the act? The law should be after him.
20 posted on 01/02/2004 12:35:33 PM PST by wtc911 (I would like at least to know his name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson