Skip to comments.
'Crikey,' Steve Irwin's baby in croc shocker -
Herald Sun - Australia ^
| January 3, 2003
| Christine Caulfield
Posted on 01/02/2004 11:49:58 AM PST by UnklGene
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
01/02/2004 11:49:58 AM PST
by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
'Crikey,' Steve. You're going to be called a 'Wacko-Jacko'
from down-under!
2
posted on
01/02/2004 11:52:10 AM PST
by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
I just saw this on my local news and I was horrified. The guy is an idiot and if the baby's mother approved this she is one also.
3
posted on
01/02/2004 11:53:52 AM PST
by
Mears
To: UnklGene
Irwin comes across as a wholesome family man...far from wacko.
He may even be a conservative, having been invited to Pres. Bush's BBQ last time he was in Australia.
Maybe this is why the media's after him.
4
posted on
01/02/2004 11:54:22 AM PST
by
what's up
To: UnklGene
Not too bright.
5
posted on
01/02/2004 11:54:49 AM PST
by
lormand
(Dead People Vote DemocRAT)
To: what's up
No, people are after him because he put his baby in danger. Wild animals are just that - wild. You can have a wild animal that works well with you for years, and then goes nuts for reasons you did not guess.
6
posted on
01/02/2004 11:56:12 AM PST
by
LPStar
To: Mears
Agreed but. If you want to return to the days of manly men and true individual freedom, non interference in families, and what not, then you can't cart someone off to jail for the life they choose for their family to lead. Having said all that, my own greatest paranoid-level nightmare is the possibility of mistakenly causing my child any harm. I think Steve crossed the line by believing in his own invincibility.
7
posted on
01/02/2004 12:01:16 PM PST
by
Williams
To: UnklGene
There's another thread on this topic
here.
I found this quote interesting:
Irwin later told the Herald Sun: "If I had known it was going to cause a ruckus I would have thrown them (the media) out by their ears.
No criminal wants witnesses around, especially when they're carrying cameras and video equipment. Not that Steve Irwin is a criminal, just incredibly foolish in his exposing his own infant child to such a risk.
8
posted on
01/02/2004 12:01:38 PM PST
by
Johnny_Cipher
(Meddle not in the affairs of crocodiles, for you are crunchy and good with catsup.)
To: UnklGene
But Irwin -- recently named Queenslander of the year -- now faces possible investigation by Queensland police, the Department of Families, and workplace safety officers. He's a dead man walking since being made Queenslander of the Year. They made "Crocodile Dundee" Australian of the year and then the next year they hunted him down and assasinated him.
So9
To: LPStar
Statistically speaking, the chances of harm coming to the kid are probably 1 in 100,000 or more based on the lightening-fast instincts of the father and his 40 or so years of experience without having coming to harm in multitudes of episodes.
However, yes, there is the outside chance an unforeseen event could take place...I grant you that.
To: what's up
Odds are, they're nature worshippers.
11
posted on
01/02/2004 12:20:42 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: LPStar
First answer to those who say he knows the Croc, is an expert is Roy thought he knew his tigers.
12
posted on
01/02/2004 12:23:01 PM PST
by
sharkhawk
(I want to go to St. Somewhere)
To: UnklGene
Horrifying is the only word to describe this scene.
13
posted on
01/02/2004 12:23:08 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: onedoug
They don't strike me that way, but I don't know for sure.
To: what's up
He may even be a conservative, having been invited to Pres. Bush's BBQ last time he was in Australia. Maybe this is why the media's after him.
Or, it could be because he dangled his newborn baby IN FRONT OF A CROCODILE!!!!!!!
15
posted on
01/02/2004 12:25:50 PM PST
by
JoeSchem
To: JoeSchem
Did he dangle it in front of the croc? I hadn't heard that.
Now that would be wacko-jacko behavior.
To: what's up
However, yes, there is the outside chance an unforeseen event could take place...I grant you that.
They could have been hit by lightening. A tree might have falled on them. His wife might have had a brain tumor and suddenly had the urge to throw the child into the crocs mouth after Irwin handed the child to her. A huge meteor could have fallen on everyone there and killed them.
It's also possible that Steve Irwin had planned on driving somewhere with the child and that they both would have died in a car accident except that Irwin decided to feed the croc with the child.
The bottom line is that nothing happened. So what's the big deal.
If this thing with Steve Irwin is so fantastic when nothing happened then Tom Hamilton should be thrown in jail for letting his daughter surf around sharks. /sarcasm off
To: UnklGene
Saw this on CNN. Sheeeeesh! After the crock jumped and chomped on the dead chicken, Daddy did a funny walking routine with the baby right into the crock's dirty water. Unbelievable.
18
posted on
01/02/2004 12:29:58 PM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: isthisnickcool
After watching Steve Irwin many times I suspect the child would be in more danger of choking on his breakfast than coming to harm in his father's arms around a croc.
This may be a bit of a stretch, but I'm sure you get my point.
To: what's up
Did you see the act? The law should be after him.
20
posted on
01/02/2004 12:35:33 PM PST
by
wtc911
(I would like at least to know his name)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson