1 posted on
01/01/2004 8:10:26 PM PST by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: kristinn
Here we go again.
2 posted on
01/01/2004 8:11:55 PM PST by
bcoffey
To: kristinn
Wow . . . somebody is seriously concerned about something here . . . this is getting very intriguing . . .
3 posted on
01/01/2004 8:11:56 PM PST by
LikeLight
( ___________________________________ it's a line)
To: Dog
Ping
4 posted on
01/01/2004 8:12:24 PM PST by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: kristinn
Sounds like they are taking this " chatter" very seriously!
5 posted on
01/01/2004 8:12:52 PM PST by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: kristinn
I wish they'd explain, atger is okay too, what's going on. Is there ANY news, at all, as to what happened re the other one ?
6 posted on
01/01/2004 8:13:28 PM PST by
nopardons
To: kristinn
Looking for another drunk TSA official no doubt.
7 posted on
01/01/2004 8:13:39 PM PST by
leadpenny
To: kristinn
Again? At least this one isn't another Flight 223. I think we've had two of those stopped in as many days.
9 posted on
01/01/2004 8:15:27 PM PST by
Ex-Dem
(>>>--------------->)
To: kristinn
I wish someone could tell us if they are give particular attention to certain passengers or if everyone is going thru the same routine.
Do they need to employee new screeners? Are these people not doing their jobs?
Is the news media asking these questions? There really should be an explaination as to why the inspections weren't done properly the first time. We have no control over what happens in other nations, so I have no problem with the extra screening which occurred last night. But this is goofy. If our baggage screeners were doing their jobs properly, a second screening shouldn't be necessary.
Makes me wonder if they are playing games with the departure schedule for some other reason.
To: kristinn
Kewel!
To: kristinn; Peach
This certainly gets more and more interesting with time...
14 posted on
01/01/2004 8:17:28 PM PST by
nwctwx
To: kristinn
Here's a side problem with these delays: The flight crews will start to bump up against crew-rest restrictions.
To: kristinn
Is the same plane that came in last night? If so, they might suspect some sort of transfer occuring on the planes themselves -- something that screening machines wouldn't pick up and regular cleaning might not find. Or maybe they've already found that something, and are trying to find the intended recipient...
To: kristinn
Wow...there is something definitely going on....this is very abnormal....it's like they know something, and they're thisclose to knowing exactly what they need to know....
25 posted on
01/01/2004 8:28:13 PM PST by
nicmarlo
To: kristinn
Passenger David Litwick told WJLA-TV in Washington that he and his wife were not questioned, but at least one other passenger was. Litwick said four FBI agents spoke to a woman who appeared to be from the Middle East, repeatedly asking her why she was not traveling with her husband.
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=25&sid=156735
26 posted on
01/01/2004 8:28:24 PM PST by
lchoro
To: kristinn
No one is telling Matt Drudge anything either. If they are, he ain't telling us.
To: kristinn
Here we go again BUMP.
To: kristinn
WTOP News update - 11:30 pm EST
Cancellations/delays due to terrorist concerns
BA 216 held because of a non-specific threat
That's all they said.
30 posted on
01/01/2004 8:32:27 PM PST by
bcoffey
To: kristinn
Wow! Another one.
Our daughter, s-i-l and grandson flew into San Francisco this afternoon aboard a BA flight.
She figured that it would be a safe flight given the fact that the route took them over Canada. What's Canada got worth attacking? :)
Then, San Francisco is safe from terrorists cuz it can't get screwed up any worse than what the libs and gays have already created.
To: kristinn
This is good. They are doing their best to prevent terrorist attacks.
To: kristinn
Mexican flight denied clearance to fly to LAReuters
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - An Aeromexico flight to Los Angeles from Mexico City was canceled on New Year's Eve when officials citing security reasons said it would not be allowed to land, Mexican officials said Thursday.
Aeromexico Flight 490 was originally scheduled to take off in the late afternoon Wednesday but it was stopped after a call from U.S. Homeland Security officials, Agustin Gutierrez Canet, a spokesman for the Mexican president's office, told Reuters.
"The flight was canceled and the 40 passengers that were programmed to fly took another later flight on Mexicana," he said.
More...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson