Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/01/2004 8:10:26 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: kristinn
Here we go again.
2 posted on 01/01/2004 8:11:55 PM PST by bcoffey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Wow . . . somebody is seriously concerned about something here . . . this is getting very intriguing . . .
3 posted on 01/01/2004 8:11:56 PM PST by LikeLight ( ___________________________________ it's a line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dog
Ping
4 posted on 01/01/2004 8:12:24 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Sounds like they are taking this " chatter" very seriously!
5 posted on 01/01/2004 8:12:52 PM PST by MEG33 (We Got Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
I wish they'd explain, atger is okay too, what's going on. Is there ANY news, at all, as to what happened re the other one ?
6 posted on 01/01/2004 8:13:28 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Looking for another drunk TSA official no doubt.
7 posted on 01/01/2004 8:13:39 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Again? At least this one isn't another Flight 223. I think we've had two of those stopped in as many days.
9 posted on 01/01/2004 8:15:27 PM PST by Ex-Dem (>>>--------------->)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
I wish someone could tell us if they are give particular attention to certain passengers or if everyone is going thru the same routine.

Do they need to employee new screeners? Are these people not doing their jobs?

Is the news media asking these questions? There really should be an explaination as to why the inspections weren't done properly the first time. We have no control over what happens in other nations, so I have no problem with the extra screening which occurred last night. But this is goofy. If our baggage screeners were doing their jobs properly, a second screening shouldn't be necessary.

Makes me wonder if they are playing games with the departure schedule for some other reason.
12 posted on 01/01/2004 8:16:59 PM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Kewel!
13 posted on 01/01/2004 8:17:16 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn; Peach
This certainly gets more and more interesting with time...
14 posted on 01/01/2004 8:17:28 PM PST by nwctwx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Here's a side problem with these delays: The flight crews will start to bump up against crew-rest restrictions.
16 posted on 01/01/2004 8:18:25 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Is the same plane that came in last night? If so, they might suspect some sort of transfer occuring on the planes themselves -- something that screening machines wouldn't pick up and regular cleaning might not find. Or maybe they've already found that something, and are trying to find the intended recipient...
18 posted on 01/01/2004 8:20:45 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Wow...there is something definitely going on....this is very abnormal....it's like they know something, and they're thisclose to knowing exactly what they need to know....
25 posted on 01/01/2004 8:28:13 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Passenger David Litwick told WJLA-TV in Washington that he and his wife were not questioned, but at least one other passenger was. Litwick said four FBI agents spoke to a woman who appeared to be from the Middle East, repeatedly asking her why she was not traveling with her husband.

http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=25&sid=156735
26 posted on 01/01/2004 8:28:24 PM PST by lchoro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
No one is telling Matt Drudge anything either. If they are, he ain't telling us.
27 posted on 01/01/2004 8:28:37 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Here we go again BUMP.
28 posted on 01/01/2004 8:28:46 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Dimension Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
WTOP News update - 11:30 pm EST

Cancellations/delays due to terrorist concerns

BA 216 held because of a non-specific threat

That's all they said.

30 posted on 01/01/2004 8:32:27 PM PST by bcoffey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Wow! Another one.
Our daughter, s-i-l and grandson flew into San Francisco this afternoon aboard a BA flight.
She figured that it would be a safe flight given the fact that the route took them over Canada. What's Canada got worth attacking? :)
Then, San Francisco is safe from terrorists cuz it can't get screwed up any worse than what the libs and gays have already created.

41 posted on 01/01/2004 8:40:06 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
This is good. They are doing their best to prevent terrorist attacks.
46 posted on 01/01/2004 8:48:39 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Mexican flight denied clearance to fly to LA
Reuters

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - An Aeromexico flight to Los Angeles from Mexico City was canceled on New Year's Eve when officials citing security reasons said it would not be allowed to land, Mexican officials said Thursday.

Aeromexico Flight 490 was originally scheduled to take off in the late afternoon Wednesday but it was stopped after a call from U.S. Homeland Security officials, Agustin Gutierrez Canet, a spokesman for the Mexican president's office, told Reuters.

"The flight was canceled and the 40 passengers that were programmed to fly took another later flight on Mexicana," he said.

More...

60 posted on 01/01/2004 9:12:33 PM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson