Skip to comments.
O'Reilly on assault weapons again (vanity)
Fox / O'Reilly Factor
| 01/01/2004
| Bill O'Reilly
Posted on 01/01/2004 5:16:42 PM PST by Sender
O'Reilly: "I believe in the Second Amendment, that includes rifles and handguns, so that people can protect their families..."
"...the vast majority of Americans agree on this (renewing the assault weapon ban)..."
"...when you get into the assault weapons, the big guns, you're out on the fringe."
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: assault; bang; banglist; guns; oreilly; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-211 next last
Sorry for the vanity. Just O'Reilly going off again.
1
posted on
01/01/2004 5:16:42 PM PST
by
Sender
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Sender
Isn't he supposed to be a conservative?
To: Sender
He's a blow hard...
4
posted on
01/01/2004 5:20:53 PM PST
by
demsux
To: Tarantulas
Isn't he supposed to be a conservative?No, he's a populist who really doesn't believe in much of anything politically speaking.
5
posted on
01/01/2004 5:21:44 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: JackRyanCIA
I stopped watching him 3 years ago.
His gun rant did it for me.
To: JackRyanCIA
The second amendment does not provide protection of just the family. It is intented for the protection of the entire country. More reading of words that aren't there and skipping ones that are.
7
posted on
01/01/2004 5:24:02 PM PST
by
Dutch Boy
To: Tarantulas
He calls himself independent. He swings about 90% right, 10% left. He's done some really good work that no 'reporter' would have done.
To: JackRyanCIA
So how is the campaign for senate going, and what do your hear from Jerri?
9
posted on
01/01/2004 5:25:39 PM PST
by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: Tarantulas
I agree with O'Reilly on a lot of things but sometimes he is just ignorant and sickening. This is one example of his ignorance. Another is his support of Gay's adopting kids. You can't tell me that that doesn't cause even more emotional problems for these children. Has anyone ever thought that maybe gays are nature's way of saying those people shouldn't be reproducing, which means they shouldn't be raising ANY kids.
To: Sender
11
posted on
01/01/2004 5:25:56 PM PST
by
Tim Osman
(A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves. - Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: Sender
"I believe in the Second Amendment"
If the dork believed in what the 2nd Amendment stood for, He would now exactly why the people who founded this country put in the USC
12
posted on
01/01/2004 5:26:40 PM PST
by
ezo4
To: Sender
the big guns, you're out on the fringe
CMT had a program that showed a clip of a party at Hank Williams Jr's place, they were firing a Civil War era cannon LOL
13
posted on
01/01/2004 5:27:36 PM PST
by
1066AD
To: Sender
Not gonna happen Billy boy because there is no political will to reinstate the AWB. The Rats still remember what happened to them in 1994. HAHA...
Say hello to the sunset -- Bill.
14
posted on
01/01/2004 5:27:48 PM PST
by
demlosers
(Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
To: Sender
The segment was a rerun from a month or so back. Larry Pratt missed a good opportunity to educate BO that the "assault weapons" in question are not assault weapons at all, but semi-automatic civilian knock-offs of military type weapons which were banned simply because of their looks.
Larry might have also pointed out that, at the time the Second Amendment was ratified, private citizens owned cannon and, indeed, warships, the most powerful weapons of their day.
To: Sender
It's OK. I would still like to hear his explanation of just what constitutes an "assault weapon". A Henry rifle would qualify, no doubt. 13 rounds, ex-military issue...
16
posted on
01/01/2004 5:29:35 PM PST
by
jonascord
(Don't bother to run, you'll only die tired...)
To: ezoeni
Ask yourself who hates O'Reilly more than you...liberals, that's who. Look into why and maybe you'll realize why he's a force for good in our nation.
17
posted on
01/01/2004 5:31:18 PM PST
by
JediJones
(THE AMERICAN SOLDIER)
To: RIGHT IN LAS VEGAS
" His gun rant did it for me."
His gun rant, his anti-lawyer tirades and his border protection using American military (totally illegal and with good reason).
He is a pompous jerk.
18
posted on
01/01/2004 5:31:26 PM PST
by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: Tim Osman
They really need an alert for that???
19
posted on
01/01/2004 5:32:33 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(A corrupt society has many laws.)
To: Morgan's Raider
So should citizens have nukes now too because they're the most powerful weapons our government has? A lot has changed since those days.
Hmm, now someone's against O'Reilly because they're pro-lawyer and anti-protecting our borders. There's a site called DU you might find more to your liking.
20
posted on
01/01/2004 5:36:52 PM PST
by
JediJones
(THE AMERICAN SOLDIER)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-211 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson