Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forest Service taking the heat
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | Jan. 1, 2004 | Brent Israelsen

Posted on 01/01/2004 2:17:49 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

For setting a "prescribed fire" that went awry in September, the U.S. Forest Service is in hot water with the state.

Rick Sprott, director of the Utah Division of Air Quality, has issued the Forest Service a "notice of violation" in connection with the Cascade Springs II fire, which burned 7,800 acres and poured smoke into the Wasatch Front for a week.

The notice accuses the Forest Service of polluting the air in Utah's population center and of failing to submit a proper plan to the division before igniting the fire. It does not call for a fine, although the notice points out the state reserves the right to levy fines in the amount of $10,000 per day of violation.

"We will follow our standard policies and penalty calculations for the appropriateness of a fine. We're not ruling [a fine] out, by any means," said Sprott.

Forest Service spokesman Dan Jiron said his agency is still reviewing the notice but plans to cooperate fully with the state in resolving any outstanding concerns.

"If there are any procedural issues involved, we'll make sure they are corrected," Jiron said.

The Cascade Springs II fire, on the Uinta National Forest west of Deer Creek Reservoir, originally was proposed to be a 600-acre "prescribed fire." Such fires are set intentionally to clear land of unwanted vegetation or to improve the vegetative "mosaic."

On Sept. 23, after studying the fire for four years and postponing it one year, Forest Service crews ignited a test burn about 12:30 p.m. The fire, however, was set outside the originally prescribed 600 acres.

By about 2:30 p.m., winds began gusting to 12 mph and a "spot fire" jumped over the containment line. A half-hour later, another spot fire broke out. The fires advanced rapidly, eventually combining. By 5 p.m., officials declared the Cascade Springs II burn, which was then at 500 acres, a wildfire.

Before firefighters contained the blaze a week later, the fire sent tons of fine-particulate pollution into the sky. Much of the smoke flowed down Provo Canyon into Utah and Salt Lake counties.

The smoke decreased visibility, forced cancellation of sporting events, sent some people to seek medical help and prompted the Division of Air Quality to warn people with respiratory problems to stay indoors.

On Sept. 25, an air-monitoring station in central Salt Lake City measured particulate pollution at 350 micrograms per cubic meter of air, well above the 150 microgram level considered unhealthy by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. A station in Lindon, in northern Utah County, measured 160 on Sept. 26.

To state officials, the most troubling aspect of the Cascade Springs II fire is why Forest Service crews set fire to a 400-acre parcel outside the original 600-acre boundaries.

The Forest Service's own post-fire investigation concluded that the "primary cause" of the wildfire was the decision to ignite that 400-acre parcel.

"This area was burned without an analysis of [containment] and contingency-force needs," the report stated.

Sprott said the Forest Service has yet to fully explain how that occurred.

"I was very surprised and very disappointed and kind of shocked that there weren't better controls on their activity," Sprott said.

The air-quality director said his agency wants assurances that the Forest Service will prevent similar occurrences.

Jiron said those procedures -- such as better training for the fire crews -- already are being implemented to provide better oversight of prescribed burns.

While authorities are reviewing and revamping procedures, nobody is questioning the need for prescribed burns, which have proven to be an effective ecological tool.

The Cascade Springs II fire, for example, is expected to vastly improve wildlife habitat.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: enviralists; environment; forestfire; landgrab; usfs; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: forester
I'd bet one could even cite civil rights laws as well as the constitution...something along the lines that rural American minority is being discriminated against by an urban majority.

The term is "disproportionate burden."

41 posted on 01/04/2004 12:09:12 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Holler away, Waspman. I've screamed about it until I have no voice left.
42 posted on 01/04/2004 4:04:16 PM PST by AuntB (REFORM SS DISABILITY: http://www.petitiononline.com/SSDC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson