Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth Loses Magnetism
BBC ^ | 1-1-2004 | Molly Bently

Posted on 01/01/2004 9:49:40 AM PST by blam

Earth loses its magnetism

By Molly Bentley
in San Francisco

Scientists have known for some time that the Earth's magnetic field is fading.

The field is mainly dipolar - but there are anomalies

Like a Kryptonite-challenged Superman, its strength has steadily and mysteriously waned, leaving parts of the planet vulnerable to increased radiation from space.

Some satellites already feel the effects.

What is uncertain is whether the weakened field is on the way to a complete collapse and a reversal that would flip the North and South Poles.

Compasses pointing North would then point South.

It is not a matter of whether it will happen, but when, said scientists who presented the latest research on the subject at a recent meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco.

But when is hard to pinpoint. The dipole reversal pattern is erratic.

"We can have periods without reversals for many millions of years, and we can have four or five reversals within one million years," said Yves Gallet, from Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France, who studies the palaeomagnetic record and estimates that the current decay started 2,000 years ago.

Flip or flop

Over the last century and a half, since monitoring began, scientists have measured a 10% decline in the dipole.

At the current rate of decline it would take 1,500 to 2,000 years to disappear.

SEAFLOOR RECORDER

* As molten rock rises, spreads out and cools, magnetised minerals record field direction
* Over millions of years, the seafloor rocks retain a 'barcode' of pole reversals
* These pole reversal events may take perhaps 10,000 years to complete
* The last major pole flip appears to have been about 780,000 years ago

A particular weakness in the field has been observed off the coast of Brazil in the so-called Southern Atlantic Anomaly. Here, eccentricities in the Earth's core have caused a "dip" in the field, leaving it 30% weaker than elsewhere.

The extra dose of radiation creates electronic glitches in satellites and spacecraft that fly through it. Even the Hubble telescope has been affected.

Magnetic reversals were always preceded by weakened magnetic fields, said Dr Gallet, but not all weakened fields bring on a flip-flop.

The Earth's invisible shield could also grow back in strength. "Then sometime, maybe 10,000 years from now, the dipole will decay again and that will lead to a reversal," said Harvard physicist Jeremy Bloxham.

The theme was recently taken up by Hollywood in the movie The Core, in which the Earth's core mysteriously stops spinning, effectively turning off the electromagnetic field.

The movie is nonsense, scientists told BBC News Online, except that the Earth's magnetic field is generated by activity deep inside it.

Iron record

The heat of the solid inner core keeps the molten cocktail of nickel and iron churning in the outer core, which generates a magnetic field.

It is not known how the core behaves exactly, but scientists have a general understanding of how electrical and fluid currents and magnetic field lines all interact to produce the field we experience outside Earth.

"If we had the equivalent of a space probe that went into the core and made measurements for us, that would tell us a tremendous amount "
Jeremy Bloxham, Harvard

Imagine the magnetic field lines within the core "twisting like spaghetti," said Peter L Olson, geophysics professor at Johns Hopkins University.

As they wind and kink around each other, their interaction can accentuate the magnetic field or diminish it.

"Depending on how it's kinked," he said, "it can be helpful or harmful."

The last time the field lines kinked into a dipole reversal was 780,000 years ago.

By studying seafloor sediment and lava flows, scientists can reconstruct the magnetic field patterns of the past. Iron in lava, for example, points in the direction of the then-existing field and is frozen in that orientation as the lava cools and hardens.

According to Dr Gallet, the oldest reversal that has been studied by lava flows comes from Greenland, dated at 16 million years. The time between reversals varies from a thousand to millions of years.

Global light show

So is the Earth about to flip? The safe bet may disappoint screenplay writers everywhere.

"Chances are we're not," said Dr Bloxham. "Reversals are rare events."

And they would certainly not threaten life on Earth as they do in science fiction. Although there would be extra radiation exposure to satellites and some airplanes, there would also be enough of a residual field to provide protection to people, and certainly no more radiation than what is observed at the poles, where the field lines currently dip.

Supercomputers have modelled the pole flipping process (Image: Los Alamos Nat Lab)

But there would be some bizarre readjustment. Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles, according to Dr Bloxham, which may make backwoods camping tricky.

"Getting around using a magnetic compass would be a more complicated endeavour," he said.

A collapse would also produce a great increase in auroral activity - the beautiful display of lights generated by solar particles that follow the magnetic field lines down into the atmosphere.

And there would be plenty to time to grab a camera - the reversal is gradual.

This would give animals which use the magnetic field for navigation, such as some birds, turtles and bees, time to reorient themselves.

"They'd go through many generations in the period in which the field was entering the phase of reversal," said Dr Bloxham. "Presumably they would learn new behaviour patterns to accommodate it."

Space within

As for the ozone layer - which was thought to be vulnerable without a protective shield - the effects would be negligible unless there was a super-solar proton event, said Charles H Jackman, an atmospheric physicist at the US space agency's Goddard Flight Center, referring to the high-energy radiation that can accompany solar flares.

The charged particles zinging down to Earth, said Dr Jackman, break apart molecules of nitrogen, whose atoms go on to form nitric oxide, which devours up ozone.

This happens all the time, but the effects would be increased during a magnetic reversal or diminished magnetic field.

Fluctuations and movement of field strength across the globe are recorded

But he said scientists saw no significant change in ozone depletion due to the Southern Atlantic Anomaly. In any case, the ozone layer would bounce back quickly from the heavy solar bombardment, healing itself in just two to three years, according to Dr Jackman.

This is not the timeline associated with anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons.

"Chlorofluorocarbons have a much longer lifetime in the atmosphere than does the nitric oxide and its associated constituents," he said.

But all these scenarios are of an indeterminate future. The Earth's interior will remain unexplored for a long time to come - only in science fiction can humans or their equipment survive the 5,500 Celsius temperature in the core to study its activity.

"If we had the equivalent of a space probe that went into the core and made measurements for us, that would tell us a tremendous amount," said Dr Bloxham. "Hollywood may be able to do these things, but we can't."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; crevolist; earth; environment; gps; loses; magneticfield; magnetism; poleshift
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: inquest
I think that's just a theory, actually. I've read somewhere that scientists don't know for certain why the magnetic field exists; that's probably the reason they have satellites to study the thing.

At the core of the earth I imagine the pressure is so great that the molten iron is crystalized. Then the molten metal spinning around the crystalized core generates a weak charge.
61 posted on 01/01/2004 1:18:09 PM PST by MetalMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There is talk of restoring Mars's mag field so there would be a shield against solar storms, but this is associated with restoring Mars's atmosphere somehow.

Your hypothesis. The truth may well be the reverse, namely that the presence of a magnetic field may provide the necessary protection for an atmosphere to form.

62 posted on 01/01/2004 1:19:49 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Right, but we don't know. My point is that we assume it is earth's core generating the magfield. The atmosphere could be doing it. All you need is dipoles. A quart of free electrons would create a field as strong as earth's gravity, so the atmosphere is plenty to generate the magfield.
63 posted on 01/01/2004 1:25:26 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
OK, here's where I'm my ignorance is going to start showing. If there's a charge in an atmosphere, wouldn't there be an equal and opposite charge somewhere else in the atmosphere, or at the surface? That being the case, wouldn't the field generated by one area of charge be canceled by a field generated by the other?
64 posted on 01/01/2004 1:57:07 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Here's the trick: Neither the iron core nor the atmosphere has a net charge, yet the core supposedly has a magnetic field. How can something have a magnetic field and no net charge? Dipoles is one answer. How does your microwave oven work while there is no charge on the Cup-o-Soup? Dipoles. It comes back to dipoles. Are there dipoles in the atmosphere? Are there dipoles in iron magnets? Yes, indeed.
65 posted on 01/01/2004 4:26:17 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the ping!
66 posted on 01/01/2004 8:45:31 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blam
Something I saw in New Scientist maybe 20 years ago:

The North Pacific Ocean is basically rotating in a clockwise direction. It is also a conductor. Threfore, its rotation is slowed by the Earth's magnetic field. If the field decreases, it speeds up a bit. This presumably has an effect on the climate, but I don't remember whether it was supposed to warm or cool it.

The point was that there is a mechanism tying the magnetic field to climate.

67 posted on 01/01/2004 10:28:58 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
You can't bury your magnets without an Environmental impact statement.

ROF!

68 posted on 01/02/2004 6:06:03 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: blam
bump
69 posted on 01/02/2004 8:05:25 AM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; inquest
Look at some fact: Mars lost its atmosphere, Mars has no mag field; the moon has no atmosphere, the moon has no mag field; Venus's atmosphere is not rotating, Venus has no mag field; the sun has an extensive rotating atmosphere, the sun has a huge mag field; Jupiter has a huge rotating atmosphere, Jupiter has a huge mag field; earth has some atmosphere, rotating, earth has some mag field. Mars has a rotating iron core but no mag field. The sun and Jupiter have no iron core, but guess what.

Sorry for jumping in a little late but

Titan has no magnetic field but it has a thicker atmosphere then Earth's and it appears to be rotating quite fast.

While Mercury has a magnetic field but for all intensive purposes has no atmosphere

So I don't see how an Atmosphere can be causing a moon/planet to have a magnetic field

70 posted on 01/03/2004 12:07:23 AM PST by qam1 (@Generation X Ping list - Freep me to be added and see my home page for details)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Mercury has a magnetic field but for all intensive purposes has no atmosphere

I don't know how intense our purposes are, probably not very. You yourself have a magnetic field as was shown by the magnetic levitiation of the frog experiment. Do you have an iron core? What is the constituency of Titan's atmosphere? Is it dipoles?

71 posted on 01/03/2004 11:29:30 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
How did a woolly mammoth freeze with tropical flowers in his mouth and stomach?

Are you referring to the Berezovka mammoth?

72 posted on 01/03/2004 1:04:11 PM PST by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Titan's atmoshpere is over 9/10 nitrogen, with the remaining mostly methane and argon, in decreasing order.

Is diatomic nitrogen a dipole?

73 posted on 01/03/2004 1:54:11 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Sorry, should have pinged you to #73 also.
74 posted on 01/03/2004 1:58:17 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Indeed, I think it has been found that some of the animals had temperate and semi-tropical diets. Whatever they were eating, it is not consistent with northern Siberia.

And whatever caused the paleolithic extinctions wasn't some kind of mild climate change that took ten millenia or so. There have been huge boneyards discovered, millions of animals crushed together by some cataclysmic event we don't yet understand. In fact, except for the mammoths frozen in the ice, and some rhino skeletons, articulated skeletons from that era are the exception, not the rule.
75 posted on 01/03/2004 2:06:52 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

Heck, all we need is a few bajillion of these wired up to a big long iron pipe...

76 posted on 01/03/2004 2:12:09 PM PST by GRRRRR (Would you like a hot towel, Mr. Hussein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Is diatomic nitrogen a dipole?

No. A dipole would be an H20 molecule, for example, with some + on one end and some - on the other. Even in liquid form where the molecule probably isn't so simple, water responds to magnetism. N2 would have a balanced charge.

This gets into the theory of how magnetism can arise from a material with no net charge. What is the cause of magnetism? a typical question from the realm of science.

77 posted on 01/03/2004 5:45:44 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I don't know how intense our purposes are, probably not very.

Well it has a atmosphere of sodium ions only on the daylight side and it's much lower in pressure than say on Mars. Plus Mercury rotates very slowly.

You yourself have a magnetic field as was shown by the magnetic levitiation of the frog experiment. Do you have an iron core?

Well I have Iron in my blood, But my magnetic field comes from the (salt?) water in my body.

What is the constituency of Titan's atmosphere? Is it dipoles?

Mostly Nitrogen just like ours, The only significant Dipole we have that Titan doesn't is water vapor, Though I can't see how the Water vapor which varies in concentration from place to place and over time in our atmosphere can be creating a relatively uniform magnetic field over the whole planet.

Also while Jupiter and the other gas giants may not have Iron cores they do have cores of metallic hydrogen which maybe responsible for their huge magnetic fields

78 posted on 01/03/2004 11:46:32 PM PST by qam1 (@Generation X Ping list - Freep me to be added and see my home page for details)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: qam1
how the Water vapor which varies in concentration from place to place and over time in our atmosphere can be creating a relatively uniform magnetic field over the whole planet.

It's not, though. It moves around, it fluctuates in strength, it has totally reversed polarity in the past. That's why I am considering a source for the field that also moves around and varies in constitution from age to age.

79 posted on 01/04/2004 11:35:18 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
So what would cause it to reverse polarity under the water-vapor hypothesis?

By the way, the sun doesn't contain any dipoles, does it?

80 posted on 01/04/2004 12:41:51 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson