Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Small plane down in North Dallas
Fox 4 Dallas | dennis1x

Posted on 01/01/2004 8:33:54 AM PST by dennis1x

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: PAR35
They can't locate everyone. It's right down the street from me. I wish the TV helicopters would go away. I've had to reset the alarm on my truck 4 times already.
41 posted on 01/01/2004 10:31:14 AM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: spookycc
Hadn't noticed that one recently. Check out 9-11.
42 posted on 01/01/2004 10:38:01 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
SeeBS 11 was reporting that the plane took off from Love Field going to Amarillo, TX, with four people were on board. No survivors from the plane. There were no fatalities on the ground.

Two houses directly hit and 3 more houses with minor damage.

43 posted on 01/01/2004 10:41:56 AM PST by SpottedBeaver (Hide not your talents, they for use were made. What's a sun-dial in the shade? - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SpottedBeaver
Is that north of LBJ?

I have kin between Lovers, Mockingbird and Greenville and Central (the neverending construction project)
44 posted on 01/01/2004 11:52:11 AM PST by wardaddy ("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Is that north of LBJ?

The plane crash was south of LBJ.

I have kin between Lovers, Mockingbird and Greenville and Central (the neverending construction project)

I live in that general area. The crash would have been about half way between here and LBJ.

45 posted on 01/01/2004 2:13:42 PM PST by SpottedBeaver (Hide not your talents, they for use were made. What's a sun-dial in the shade? - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SpottedBeaver
thanks..
46 posted on 01/01/2004 3:00:29 PM PST by wardaddy ("either the arabs are at your throat, or at your feet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Peach
FWIW - Over the past months, many of the early reports of these small plane crashes have detailed more dead passengers than finally are listed officially as on board the flight.

Here the SacBee says "four passengers." But now we're hearing "two passengers."

I've seen this pattern several times, such as on Friday, 6-6-03, when a small plane nose-dived into an Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in L.A.

This numbering-down of passengers is peculiar and strangely frequent lately. Wonder if there are "wheel-well stowaways" on props with evil-doer intentions?

47 posted on 01/01/2004 3:14:52 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
You have a devious mind. I like it.

Actually, you may be onto something here. You're right - this has happened several times now and one has to wonder at the reason.
48 posted on 01/01/2004 3:16:16 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Nope, it's just the usual fog and confusion right after an incident, with everybody guessing from the passenger capacity of the plane (the SacBee probably heard it was a four-passenger plane and the reporter said "as many as 4" and that got edited down to "4 passengers").

A copy of the flight plan can't be obtained by the news hounds immediately. When they get that, the numbers settle down.

49 posted on 01/01/2004 3:18:19 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Peach
You're right - this has happened several times now and one has to wonder at the reason.

Vast grand gov't conspiracies to hide the truth (for what reason - to what nefarious end)?

Mysterious stowaways hiding on small aircraft (ONE wonders how they were missed during the pilot's pre-flight walk-around inspection)?

OR maybe the press has been going with 'various' accounts by various sources - the flight-line personnel who witnessed persons approaching said aircraft while on the ground, the flight plan filed with the FAA and finally unofficial 'observers' at the crash flight that don't know what they're looking at from a distance ...

50 posted on 01/01/2004 3:25:26 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dennis1x
where is everyone in dallas? i'm in garland but will probably be down greenville later toniet
51 posted on 01/01/2004 4:02:24 PM PST by placebo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texagirl4W
One house was vacant, the other occupied by one man who was rescued.

From news reports I've heard today, apparently the man is elderly and was literally carried out of the burning house by his caretaker, a small woman. I haven't found a picture of her (or him) yet, but if the facts hold up, the woman is a hero.

52 posted on 01/01/2004 4:13:22 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Dimension Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
...listed officially as on board the flight.

Officially? Do you call the local police HQ every time you and the wife drive to the supermarket and tell them how many people will be in your car, your time of departure, amount of fuel on board, and estimated time of return?

53 posted on 01/01/2004 4:34:41 PM PST by snopercod (Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; Peach
I only take the plane to the mall every other Tuesday...

It's just speculation, sc. No need to get worked up about it.

Follow the news reports yourself and see if history repeats.

54 posted on 01/01/2004 4:45:49 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
I have two friends with private planes and last I knew, although I grant you I don't pay a lot of attention, they have to file passenger lists as they are preparing to leave the airport.

It's how when there is a plane crash, authorities are able to so quickly determine who was on board.
55 posted on 01/01/2004 4:48:53 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I have a relative who pilots trans-Atlantic business jets as well as smaller planes for recreation, and he was given this warning months ago.

It's not surprising when you consider the times.

Vigilance everywhere.

56 posted on 01/01/2004 4:56:55 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Peach
VFR pilots have the option of filing a flight plan with the FAA. The idea used to be that if you were overdue at your destination, people would come looking for you along your route of flight.

Since about 15 years ago when the FAA started using flight plans against pilots in enforcement actions, many pilots have simply stopped filing them.

Many VFR pilots now just give their flight plan to a friend or relative, not the government.

After all, you don't need permission from the federal government to drive to the supermarket. Why should a pilot need permission to fly to a neighboring community on a business or sighseeing trip?

IFR flights are different. You are required to file a flight plan if you want to fly on instruments.

57 posted on 01/01/2004 5:01:00 PM PST by snopercod (Wishing y'all a prosperous, happy, and FREE new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; Peach
The point of my comment was not so much about procedure as it was an observation of a strangly consistent over-estimation of casualties in the initial reports/eyewitness accounts of light airplane crashes, followed by a numbering down in official reports, which then match the flight plans and/or relative's reports.

I have yet to see one where the actual body count went up from first reports regarding the number of occupants.

Probably just an oddity, all these sightings of elusive dead guys.

58 posted on 01/01/2004 5:13:57 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The point of my comment was not so much about procedure as it was an observation of a strangly consistent over-estimation of casualties in the initial reports/eyewitness accounts of light airplane crashes, followed by a numbering down in official reports, which then match the flight plans and/or relative's reports.
What's your point there anyway - is that more a commentary on how variable the press's "numbers" can be?

SURELY you don't believe there are *sinister* forces at work subtlety and efficiently working to reduce the body count - do you?

59 posted on 01/01/2004 5:22:54 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Don't call me Shirley.
60 posted on 01/01/2004 5:35:43 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson