Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth's journey is right on time
dailycamera.com ^ | Dec 30, 2003 | By Ryan Morgan, Camera Staff Writer

Posted on 12/30/2003 5:44:51 PM PST by e_engineer

The Earth won't be having seconds this year, thank you.

And that has scientists across the world — including those who run the atomic clock at the National Institute for Science and Technology in Boulder — scratching their heads.

Advertisement

Take a Colorado Ski Vacation Apparently, the Earth isn't slowing down as it used to, and no one knows why.

Flip your calendar back to 1972. That's the year the world began its current system of atomic time-keeping. NIST operates one of the clocks used to set "Coordinated Universal Time."

Scientists soon discovered they had a small problem: The rate at which the Earth travels through space had slowed ever so slightly, and as a result was completing its 365-day journey around the sun one second behind schedule.

To make the world's official time agree with where the Earth actually sat in space, scientists started having the atomic clocks count an extra "leap second" on the last day of the year.

"They came close to matching it, but they had to add a second to keep it in sync," said John Lowe, a NIST researcher who works in the agency's Time and Frequency Division.

For 28 years, scientists repeated the procedure. Then, in 1999, they discovered that the Earth was no longer lagging behind. It didn't need a leap second.

This is the fifth consecutive year that the Earth hasn't lagged behind schedule.

Fred McGehan, a spokesman for NIST, said most scientists agree that the Earth has been very gradually slowing down for millennia. But, he said, they don't have a good explanation for the five years it's been on schedule.

Possible explanations include the tides, weather and changes in the Earth's core.

Contact Ryan Morgan at morganr@dailycamera.com or (303) 473-1333.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; leapsecond; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
61 posted on 12/31/2003 6:32:24 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
We have to account for leap seconds, as that's obviously a component (albeit small) in the equation.

Unless you use a .tle that was computed in UTC when your system is running in GPS time! :-) LOL

62 posted on 12/31/2003 6:48:56 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; RadioAstronomer
Earth has stopped slowing down in its orbit due to certain very sensitive and highly secret adjustments that I've made recently in my la-BOR-a-tory. That's all I can reveal at this time.
63 posted on 12/31/2003 6:49:41 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Unless you use a .tle that was computed in UTC when your system is running in GPS time! :-)

You've done that too, huh?

Ah, well -- it's only 50 km at GPS altitudes.

64 posted on 12/31/2003 6:51:42 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
LOL! (ya cloning again?) Two million PatrickHenrys on one spot is causing it?
65 posted on 12/31/2003 6:52:30 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
You've done that too, huh?

ROFL! Yup!

66 posted on 12/31/2003 6:53:14 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Not cloning. But I can tell you that it involves aligning my bed with the direction of earth's motion. It would not be prudent to divulge more.
67 posted on 12/31/2003 7:00:00 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Fingers in ears! LALALALALALALA! hehehehe
68 posted on 12/31/2003 7:05:10 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MikeD
Ping! :-)
69 posted on 12/31/2003 7:09:44 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
The Apparent Magnitude is how bright a star appears to us hear on the Earth.

The music of the spheres? ;^)

70 posted on 12/31/2003 7:43:43 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: RadioAstronomer
Man, after all that, and you DIDN'T bother to work the "Equation of Time" into your essay??????

I've heard of blowing an opportunity, but sheesh!

72 posted on 12/31/2003 8:20:00 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
OK fellow Freepers, Why is the Earth no longer slowing down in orbit?

Because it's wearing heavy boots.

No, wait...wrong question...

73 posted on 12/31/2003 8:24:16 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer; RadioAstronomer
I remember listening to Anonymous Male Voice ring in the new year at WWV and counting down those 61 seconds on my shortwave radio many years ago. (Talk about a geeky way to celebrate the New Year!)
74 posted on 12/31/2003 9:54:18 PM PST by jennyp ("His friends finally hit on something that would get him out of the fetal position: Howard Dean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
no longer encountering much space dust?
75 posted on 01/01/2004 7:09:48 AM PST by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

From here.

Pictures help with some of those concepts. Very nice work!

76 posted on 01/01/2004 10:57:51 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Gotcha. But: "IF the difference between UT1 and UTC approaches .09 seconds, a leap second is added"

0.09 seconds? Do you mean 0.9 seconds? Why add a leap second for a tenth-second difference?

--Boris

77 posted on 01/01/2004 1:33:00 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Personally I have always felt that either the second or the meter needs to be redefined so that the speed of light comes out to precisely 3.0x108 m/s.

I believe the current value is 2.9979x108...it annoys me that it doesn't come out even.

--Boris

78 posted on 01/01/2004 1:35:54 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
This cam--from http://emsh.calarts.edu/~mathart/Clock_Cam.html embodies the Equation of Time for

The Clock of the Long Now.


79 posted on 01/01/2004 1:45:08 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Whatever happened to Planet X?
It was supposed to show up in May of 2003 and cause all sorts of trouble.
I"m deeply saddened....
80 posted on 01/01/2004 1:45:10 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson