Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberCowboy777
Big difference in my book.

You miss my point: Why must service in the armed forces be seen as less rewarding than attending Harvard?

The very fact that the military has room for judges to send them criminals means there's something wrong.

Men should be lined-up to join their countries military--and Harvard should get those that the military rejects or Harvard should get them after their service is over.

258 posted on 12/30/2003 4:58:42 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: Age of Reason
I did miss your point, I thought you felt it was a bad program.

I agree with you on your point. One reason must be the commitment level - most Americans hate commitment. Then the pay.... my dad got out after 12 years because of pay and affirmative action. We where pretty damn poor while he was serving.

The training is actually very good - my cousin is in the Navy and is training for things that will make him a valuable asset to the civilian world - my dad trained in electronics and computers, has made a good living in that field ever since.

I would say that those who cannot afford Harvard see the value in Military service. Many of my "poor white" buddies have or are serving.

259 posted on 12/30/2003 5:06:59 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (This Quiet Diplomacy was brought to you by BIG STICK foreign policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson