Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Technology moves faster than regulators
USA Today ^ | 12/28/2003 | Michael Rodemeyer

Posted on 12/29/2003 8:46:10 AM PST by presidio9

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:38 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Pet stores across most of America are set to begin selling a transgenic

(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: biotechnology; environment; glofish

1 posted on 12/29/2003 8:46:10 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
My fishtank has been in storage in the states for just over 3 years now. I cant wait to get it back.
2 posted on 12/29/2003 9:12:50 AM PST by EuroFrog (A chicken by any other name still tastes like chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This is the "precautionary principle" out of control. A thing is assumed to be dangerous until proven safe by a government agency. They will eventually regulate every single breath we take. The fallacy is that a panel of bureaucrats has the wisdom to know.
3 posted on 12/29/2003 9:20:53 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
I was gonna say... How about just holding people accountable for the consequences of their actions? I guess that must be like speaking Lithuanian to some of these people.
4 posted on 12/29/2003 9:53:19 AM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
In government, inertia is an unmeasured work-product.
5 posted on 12/29/2003 10:00:27 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
But earlier this month the FDA announced that it would not review GloFish because the agency doesn't believe the fish pose a direct risk to the food supply or the environment. The question is: How does the FDA know GloFish are safe without a review?

Sheesh. Clearly, the FDA conducted some sort of review, if only to determine that a thorough one is unnecessary. The author should be concerned if the FDA said "GloFish? What GloFish?".

Looks like this could be a case of actual government prudence, and less the debacle the author apparently wants it to be.

6 posted on 12/29/2003 10:17:07 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson