And there is a problem with this...how?
Bleeding heart damned liberals can't grasp the concept of unconventional warfare.
Once you bring the battle to the bastards in their own language, you've won half of it.
These "insurgents" are too well educated by our own citizens: the DU types, the Batcrap followers, the Garafalos, the Scott Ritters, the Barbra Streisands, all the stinking traitorous pieces of human excrement, that stand and make the treasonous statements they make, all serve to embolden these "insurgents", because they truly believe that all Americans are cast from the same chickenshit mold..
Until we start ignoring the politically correct bullshit and start taking them out in the most unconventional ways tactically possible, we will not win their hearts and minds.
I am appalled at the weakness of some of our tactical leaders, in their refusal to fight dirty.
What the hell is a clean fight, anyway?
The aim is to kill the enemy. I don't care what you call it, call it revenge if you want, but for every US soldier that falls in that stinking country, ten of the so-called "insurgent" guerillas should fall.
And we have the capability to make it so. I know it and I know damn well that there are a lot of former NCO's on this forum that know it.
We'll never change the Arabs view of us, even those that have the true desire to ally with us.
Knowing that, realizing that, just why would we care what the results of our unconventional conduct of war would be, anyway, as long as it results in the stabilization of the region?
The US soldier is not a statesman, nor should he be.
The US soldier is a killer of men and he should be allowed to do just that, in whatever way it can be accomplished.
This namby-pamby crap sickens me. It comes up after every stinking conflict the US is involved in.
Were our widdle soldier-woldiers good widdle boys? Did they play all nicey-nice?
Hummmph!
I am appalled at the weakness of many of the American people. They are so easily influenced by the CNN's, ABC's, NBC's, and SeeBS's of the media. It sucks.
But then, I'm just a National Guardsman who's been active since 12 SEP 01, and according to FReeper's, whaddahell do I know about the Army?
I assumed we've been fighting "dirty" but not advertising it. Isn't that the way it's done? Not sure I'd call it dirty, though. I'd refer to it as professionally tactical.
Holy Cow! I've never heard it put better....