Skip to comments.
‘Al Qaeda vows back-breaking strike’
The Indian EXPRESS ^
| DECEMBER 26
Posted on 12/27/2003 12:27:02 PM PST by Mossad1967
A London-based Arab magazine said on Friday that Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden has vowed to launch a back-breaking attack on the US by February, confirming an earlier message by the militant network. The weekly al-Majalla said it received an e-mail from Abu Mohammed al-Ablaj, a little known Al Qaeda member, saying bin Laden would release a video tape in which he affirms his groups determination to fight the US.
A messenger of bin Laden informed him (Ablaj) that the Al Qaeda leader will appear on a televised tape after the execution of an operation which bin Laden described as back-breaking and which would change the order of things, al-Majalla said in a report in its latest edition.
They (Americans) should prepare...their coffins, hospitals and graves. The coming days will be full of surprises and great events which will make them a historic example, the magazine quoted Ablaj as saying. The report came after US officials ordered their colour-coded alert system raised to orange, the second highest level, citing possible year-end attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at indianexpress.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alablaj; almajalla; alqaeda; amreeka; binladen; jihadinamerica; obl; orangealert; religionofpieces; terrorism; threats; videotape; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 221-237 next last
To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
I'm starting to believe Osama and Baghdad Bob are cut from the same family tree Highly likely. Last count, I think there was a total of three seperate gene pools in the Mid East.
161
posted on
12/27/2003 6:12:47 PM PST
by
riri
To: imaamibnalqayyim
But some non civilians on that terrible day were less-than innocent Holy crap! A terrorist right here on FR.
Maybe CAIR is taking a page from Clinton, and sending its disrupters here to annoy.
162
posted on
12/27/2003 6:13:58 PM PST
by
Defiant
(A metrosexual is a nancy-boy.)
To: imaamibnalqayyim
bye, to bad it wasn't nice knowing you
163
posted on
12/27/2003 6:17:17 PM PST
by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: Defiant
I think our little friend here is saying that the people who perished in the Pentagon attack weren't innocent, since they were in the military.
Only guessing here, and watching with Root Beer and popcorn...
164
posted on
12/27/2003 6:17:17 PM PST
by
Maigrey
(Save the Endangered Tagline! Call 1-800-Tagline! Save the Endangered Tagline!)
To: imaamibnalqayyim
I am fairly new to the religion and want to see the change you speak about. But it can only be done at the primary educational level in every Arab states. I have no power there.You best get BUSY AS HECK working towards civilizing your religion, because right now ... looks like you've just chosen the wrong side in the civilization/modernity debate.
(And all the nukes in the American arsenal are not going to win the hearts and minds of the people who learned political nonsense disguising itself as Quranic teachings.)
At this time we are rapidly headed to a World War. Please know nukes will factor in nicely during this sort of conflict. Russia will join our side, as will China -- they have had their own problems with Islam. That means it is Islam against the worlds strongest three nations -- not to mention Europe.
I'm not sure you people really want to face that.
So GET TO WORK on converting hearts and minds in your people, or you are in very deep feces.
165
posted on
12/27/2003 6:19:10 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I slam, you slam, we all slam, for Islam!)
To: Tall_Texan
I question how a plane that leaves Paris and intentionally crashes in L.A. or Vegas will have much jet fuel left to create similar distruction. Those were Boston to LA non-stop flights on 9/11. A plane going from Paris to LA non-stop should have the same amount of fuel arriving on the East Coast in order to continue on to LA that a plane departing the East Coast would have to reach the same destination. The distance and therefore the amount of fuel on board is the same as it was on 9/11 if they attack an East Coast target from Paris.
166
posted on
12/27/2003 6:21:14 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: imaamibnalqayyim
Gee, you are hilarious.
The muslims, RATs and commies are not going to be happy with you. You gave up.
167
posted on
12/27/2003 6:21:50 PM PST
by
HighWheeler
(def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: Lazamataz
"He's dead Jim."
Bones
168
posted on
12/27/2003 6:23:14 PM PST
by
HighWheeler
(def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: HighWheeler
Since you don't seem to be as bright as you think you are, combined with your deep islamic faith being now in serious doubt, I'll tell you that "Imaam ibn al-Qayyi" wrote "THE GREAT VIRTUE OF LOWERING THE GAZE"Good job. You exposed a fake Islamic.
Too bad, too. I really would have liked it if this troll was a real Islamic and really did bring his warnings to his imams, and really did attempt to civilize this uncivilized religion.
169
posted on
12/27/2003 6:24:09 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I slam, you slam, we all slam, for Islam!)
To: imaamibnalqayyim
>>>Me telling you that a very minute part of Muslim society
Muslim society? You are a new convert. You are not qualified to speak on Islam or Muslim society.
Try growing up in a third world regime/Muslim community owning nothing but the shirt on your back. Then, if you OWN something, anything, you have to watch your own brother who will stab you in the back to take it.
Then recruiters come. They give you clothes, education, beautiful wives and they teach you all about being a mujihideen.
When you grow up like this, then come speak to us about Islam and Muslim Society. Because, my friend, I hate to break the news to you, but you are still a Kafir. You are only a convert. That ranks you at the level of being a slave to the Muslims.
170
posted on
12/27/2003 6:24:23 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: FreedomCalls
Your point would be relevant if they were planning to strike a target on the East Coast. Allegedly, they were aiming for L.A. or Vegas, hence the reason for my comments.
Maybe if they were on a flight from Hawaii to D.C., and targeted California or Nevada, the same theory would apply.
171
posted on
12/27/2003 6:25:40 PM PST
by
Tall_Texan
(Want to improve your memory? Loan someone your money.)
To: Mossad1967
Islam Militant has more to lose than they think, here. The dearth of street demonstrations in the US following 9/11 by American Muslims in support of their country went unremarked by this administration for reasons of temporary unity.
Another 9/11-sized atrocity may be what is necessary for America to stop looking for bombs and start looking for terrorists. No more limiting frisks to hotties and grannies at clogged air terminals. Profiling will be de riguer and we will at last be forced into a war that is heavily religious. Mecca, Medina, and Palestine will no longer be sequestered. And no more will there be a difference between blowing up Americans and blowing up Israelis. Osama will be the death of his people.
172
posted on
12/27/2003 6:26:47 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: mhking
Not very old though, thank you.That's telling him Michael! ROFL-- (I read his post to you before he was banned)
:^D
Prairie
173
posted on
12/27/2003 6:28:44 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(President George W. Bush....most assuredly, MY President!)
To: Lazamataz
Yeah, I was wondering about an islamist posting here, especially since he was fairly easy to trip up on his own "religion".
He's probably with his DUfus buddies now, talking it up.
174
posted on
12/27/2003 6:29:06 PM PST
by
HighWheeler
(def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: Maigrey
I got that part, but that shows that this guy thinks it's ok to hijack a plane and slam it into a military installation (killing dozens of passengers) in order to randomly kill people who are either in the military or might be in the military, and who therefore might possibly have....what? Been in desert Storm rescuing Arabs from Arabs? Or in Kosovo saving Muslims from Christians?
That makes him a terrorist in my book.
In a war, it is legitimate to attack the military targets of the enemy, and I suppose the Pentagon would qualify, but wars can only be fought be nations, and attacks cannot be made by using civilian jets.
175
posted on
12/27/2003 6:32:31 PM PST
by
Defiant
(A metrosexual is a nancy-boy.)
To: HighWheeler
He actually may be an operative and not a troll. Maybe we should bring him back.
176
posted on
12/27/2003 6:32:57 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: prairiebreeze
He was banned? So I posted to air.
177
posted on
12/27/2003 6:36:22 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: HighWheeler
I think ibn al qayyim ibn gone now.
178
posted on
12/27/2003 6:37:00 PM PST
by
Defiant
(A metrosexual is a nancy-boy.)
To: prairiebreeze
The thread is looking like swiss cheese now too. All his posts being removed.
179
posted on
12/27/2003 6:37:14 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: Calpernia
Yes he's gone. One heck of a post though Cal, I've re-read it a couple of times.
Prairie
180
posted on
12/27/2003 6:38:20 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(President George W. Bush....most assuredly, MY President!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 221-237 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson