Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banned by AOL
American Spectator ^ | 12/22/2003 | Kathy Shaidle

Posted on 12/23/2003 3:12:09 PM PST by walford

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: walford
I banned AOL from my computer...I still remember why too...


It seemed like every other day Rosie O'Donnells fat face would show up on my homepage.

I told them one more time and I'm pulling the plug.

Two days later there she was again...That was it! I couldn't take anymore, last chapter in the book for AOL!

Best thing I ever did!
81 posted on 12/24/2003 5:53:26 AM PST by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas
I still have my AOL account, I can't let go of it. I got it in 1991. I was truly one of the first. My first name is my email account, that shows how early I was. Back in the early days, AOL was the greatest. I mean it. The political chat room were fabulous. The people who used the internet in the early days were people who knew computers...academia...military, government..etc. There were no teenagers asking you how big your breasts are. I met Tony Snow in a political chat room on AOL in 1992 and we remain friends today.

The only other browser was the early netscape and when I think about it today, it's incredible how the world has changed in less than 15 years. I don't know why I hang on to the account now, though. I have a different email account so all I get is junk mail there. I think it's time to let go of it. But I do get angry when people bash AOL so much. It broke the ground for what the internet would become and it was easier to teach someone with no real computer experience the internet starting on AOL than flinging them out on their own. Oh well.
82 posted on 12/24/2003 5:57:54 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"It broke the ground for what the internet would become and it was easier to teach someone with no real computer experience the internet starting on AOL than flinging them out on their own. Oh well."

Its time has come and gone. Why do you think Ted Turner dumped them. They are a leftie driven organazation that blocks items it deems not appropriate to the leftie leaning persuasion. There are SO MANY MORE ISP's out there. With the influx of Cox Cable and Roadrunner....BLEH why go AOL?!!
83 posted on 12/24/2003 6:04:47 AM PST by AbsoluteJustice (By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Did you read my whole post? I have high-speed access and rarely use AOL. My point was that AOL was very, very good when it first started and I have an emotional tie to it. That's all.
84 posted on 12/24/2003 6:08:59 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: walford
AOL also blocks MoveOn.org which is causing the Left to claim that AOL has given to the Bush Crime Family.
85 posted on 12/24/2003 6:59:32 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred; Hildy
ladyinred:
"Is your screenname related to the EastEnders?"

http://mason.gmu.edu/~walford/AboutTheAuthor.html

Hildy:
Now that I'm middle-aged, I don't care how big they are. I won't ask you any questions about them at all. I'm just as interested as before, but more circumspect. But you have got me wondering...

86 posted on 12/24/2003 11:49:43 AM PST by walford (Believe it or not, we have options beyond SECULAR dogmatism and RELIGIOUS dogmatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: walford
Geez...you made me scroll back like 100 posts to remember what the hell you were referring to! You'll forgive me if I do not answer your question :)
87 posted on 12/24/2003 11:58:19 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
For the record, I didn't actually ask. You have all my respect...
88 posted on 12/24/2003 12:44:59 PM PST by walford (Believe it or not, we have options beyond SECULAR dogmatism and RELIGIOUS dogmatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Capriole
Very clever. That will get you banned, all right. But it may not stop AOL from billing you forever. I'd love to hear a clever way to stop them from doing that!

Call your credit card company or local bank (depending on how you're being billed) and inform them the charges are fraudulent. They're required by law to remove them immediately and deal with the company themselves.

You should then also file a complaint with your state's Attorney General's office, as well as Virginia's (where AOL is headquartered). You could even file a lawsuit, if you had the time, money and inclination.

89 posted on 12/24/2003 1:16:39 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hildy; AbsoluteJustice
I still have my AOL account, I can't let go of it. I got it in 1991. I was truly one of the first. My first name is my email account, that shows how early I was.

AOL, in more or less the form we currently know it today, dates back to 1985. The company itself in earlier incarnations dates back to either 1982 or 1978, depending on how one wishes to interpret Steve Case's involvement and how a couple of older online services run by eventual key AOL figures managed to get folded into AOL Inc later on.

AOL was the greatest. I mean it. The political chat room were fabulous. The people who used the internet in the early days were people who knew computers...academia...military, government..etc. There were no teenagers asking you how big your breasts are.

Oh, they were there. They just kept to the rooms where they thought they stood the best chance of getting some action because they were paying six bucks an hour. ;)

The only other browser was the early netscape and when I think about it today, it's incredible how the world has changed in less than 15 years.

Not to be pedantic, but AOL didn't offer web access of any sort until mid-1995, two and a half years after Mosaic/Netscape was first released for users of real ISPs (which AOL was not at the time).

But I do get angry when people bash AOL so much. It broke the ground for what the internet would become and it was easier to teach someone with no real computer experience the internet starting on AOL than flinging them out on their own.

I think the reason for the overall hatred of AOL is that the service, for the longest time, was not part of the Internet at all, except for some rudimentary email relay capabilities. For many years, including a period well after it became obvious that the Internet was the way of the future, AOL went out of its way to develop proprietary services that could be accessed nowhere else. But when AOL did decide to link itself to the Internet, they did it in a coarse, break-down-the-door fashion that literally destroyed Internet culture as it was known up to that point, drastically lowering the overall IQ of the Net in the process. (For more on this, Google the phrase "The September That Never Ended" sometime.) For obvious reasons, this gave the service a nasty "trailer park" reputation and caused almost everyone already on the Net up to that point to develop a permanent hatred for AOL.

Ironically, as the evidence became overwhelming that remaining a proprietary service was becoming a recipe for eventual bankruptcy, AOL did a 180-degree turn, killing off almost all its proprietary services and turning itself into a regular ISP, except that it was designed as "the ISP that's easy to use." This, naturally, only further cemented AOL's reputation as the online home for people incapable of doing anything online that was more complex than clicking on pretty buttons. (Whether this rep is fair or not is open to debate, of course.)

Even more ironically, now that there's so much competition out there both from other "easy" ISPs such as MSN and from cable modems, AOL is once again trying to build up some proprietary services to give consumers a reason to choose it over all the other services, and it's having no success at this whatsoever; its subscriber numbers continue to plummet.

AOL had its day, but that day is long gone. Steve Case made the very smart move of waiting until the dotcom bubble hit its peak and then using AOL's grossly inflated stock value to eat up a solid, profitable company with a real business plan before the bubble burst. He did, and the idiots at Time Warner were left holding the bag after the Internet collapse. If it wasn't for that merger, AOL would probably have gone out of business two or three years ago. (As it is, I believe Time Warner is now worth only about half of what it was pre-merger, almost entirely due to the drag on earnings caused by AOL.) Now that the old TW management has succeeded in overthrowing the AOL gang and regaining full control of the company, a lot of analysts expect TW to spin off AOL at some point and leave to to sink or swim on its own. Within a year or so after that, it'll likely sink.

90 posted on 12/24/2003 2:59:12 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: walford

I hate AOL.

91 posted on 01/05/2004 3:28:05 AM PST by martin_fierro (Apocalypso!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I only have three words:

"SUCK IT, TREBEK!"

92 posted on 01/05/2004 3:48:46 AM PST by Malacoda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: walford
Simple solution, dump AOL. I have never used AOL and if I am on someone else's computer who does, I simple do not use their browser. Most surfing complaints I've heard have been from AOL users. Also, if they can manage to get anything on your computer, it is virtually impossible to get rid of. I know I went to try and play some media thing a while back, (I had nothing of AOL on my computer at the time) and was told I had to upgrade Real Player. When I did, I suddenly had AOL icons on my system. Given the way they operate (or DON'T operate might be more accurate) I wouldn't have anything to do with them.
93 posted on 01/05/2004 3:57:48 AM PST by sweetliberty (Even the smallest person can change the course of the future. - (LOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
"...if they can manage to get anything on your computer, it is virtually impossible to get rid of. I know I went to try and play some media thing a while back, (I had nothing of AOL on my computer at the time) and was told I had to upgrade Real Player. When I did, I suddenly had AOL icons on my system..."



Yes, anything AOL-affiliated will imbed AOL executables on your system. Given that I prefer the Netscape browser, every time I do an upgrade, the next step is removing these unrequested programs.

McAfee's Quick Clean [formerly Network Associate's Uninstaller] is highly effective at doing that. They finally have a version that is compatible with Win2k/NT. It is offered as a yearly subscription, but that isn't necessary. It is a good program for removing garbage files also. It has a 'quick clean' feature that removes invalid registry files that is helpful when your browser gets stuck/slows down while surfing. [ps - I'm getting no commission on my suggestion]
94 posted on 01/06/2004 1:33:12 PM PST by walford (going back to college full-time soon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson