Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Submarine damage worse than expected [USS Hartford]
Navy Times ^ | December 23, 2003 | AP Staff

Posted on 12/23/2003 2:57:07 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Edited on 05/07/2004 10:11:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

GROTON, Conn.

(Excerpt) Read more at navytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: usshartford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Doohickey
They normally don't do TRE in the Med, usually at AUTEC in the Bahamas. Now ORSE's will happen during the transit home, but the work-up can starts month before. During my last visit over there, we did VIP cruises in the vicinity of La Mad, wonder if that's what they were doing at the time? ala USS Greenville?
61 posted on 12/23/2003 7:17:31 PM PST by SolitaryMan ((TMC/SS Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
I did a TRE/CRE out of La Madd in the late '90's. They flew the TRE team in from Norfolk. We got the Battle "E" and Green "C" that year.
62 posted on 12/23/2003 7:19:26 PM PST by Doohickey (The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
The TRE was done in the Med?
63 posted on 12/23/2003 7:35:42 PM PST by SolitaryMan ((TMC/SS Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
At the risk of offending liberal readers, are we talking affirmative action sub driver here?

HELL NO.

Chris Van metre is the son of one submarine skipper and the grandson of another. He was a stellar performer as a junior officer (NCM on his first tour, this was in the days before they were given out for petty PC stuff.) The Squadron Commander (Captain) rides all boats out of La Mad and he didn't see this coming either. CO is by definition responsible for the state of training of the NAV team - but keep in mind CDR VanMetre had had command for less than four months.

64 posted on 12/23/2003 7:39:42 PM PST by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Has the rank of Commodore been reactivated? I know about ten years ago it was being considered?

It's a title, not a rank. It's used to denote someone who commands a squadron of ships or submarines.

65 posted on 12/24/2003 4:44:08 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
Yep. It was unusual, and given that it was the end of the run and we were going to be doing ORSE workup on the transit back, we were shall we say, less than enthusiastic.
66 posted on 12/24/2003 6:53:33 AM PST by Doohickey (The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I sailed out of there twice. The Captain was not doing his job.
67 posted on 12/24/2003 6:59:56 AM PST by bmwcyle (Hillary's election to President will start a civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
You would think that updates would be automatice in todays world of computers, etc.

While all those data are available, they are plotted on the "secondary" plot. Primary is still visual bearings, shot throught the periscope.

68 posted on 12/24/2003 7:03:23 AM PST by j_tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
No. He's called the Commodore because he is in a flag billet (Commodore is equivalent to a Rear Admiral (lower half)). Normally, he's actually a Captain.

Similarly, a ship's "Captain" is normally a Commander in rank, except for very large targets like bird farms and some Tico-class cruisers.
69 posted on 12/24/2003 7:05:34 AM PST by Doohickey (The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; All
Thanks for info all. I work for the Navy on the shipbuilding side, and I haven't heard *jack* of this incident.
70 posted on 12/24/2003 7:10:01 AM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You're right in that it's the CO's responsibility.

It's the Quartermaster's duty to plot all fixes on the approved navigation chart. He was likely getting a ton of fixes: GPS, radar, visuals and if this boat was like mine; LORAN. All the fixes in the world don't do you any good if you don't plot them. The fathometer should have been running too (it's located directly outboard and slightly forward of the plotter).

Worse, if the Nav party was stationed (as I imagine it was), this means the XO was Control Room Supervisor, the Navigator was in charge of the Nav party and the ANav was Contact Coordinator, and every single one of them was screwing the pooch.

There was simply NO excuse for this.

71 posted on 12/24/2003 7:18:16 AM PST by Doohickey (The ultimate paradigm of government is the public restroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
if they refurbished an older Los Angeles class that they were planning to take out of service they could probably get a usable boat for about half a billion.

Hartford is one of the later-model 688s with the VLS tubes and some additional capabilities. I think most, if not all of the 688s that are being retired early (at their mid-life refueling point) are the earlier, non-VLS models.

It would definitely be possible to decomm Hartford and replace her with a 688 that's slated to leave service. The 688s that are going out are going out YOUNG, due to the cost of refueling, not because of age or mechanical issues. I actually don't think the cost of doing so would be that excessive, since the Navy would be taking the cost of Hartford's mid-life refueling/overhaul (which would probably happen around her 20-year service mark, in 2014) and applying it to another boat, just earlier. Time value of money comes into play, of course, and you'd still have a less-capable (non-VLS) boat.
72 posted on 12/24/2003 7:33:46 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Commodore, although no longer used as a rank (Used to be 1 star ADM), is still a title for a squadron commander, usually a very senior Capt or Junior 1 star. In some of the Surface squadrons it can even be a 2 star.
73 posted on 12/24/2003 8:11:37 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HP8753
Depends on depth ... to go further into the details of submarine electronic capabilities would delve into the word of the classified
74 posted on 12/24/2003 8:13:36 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
I believe you are completely correct. The number I threw out for a re-do on an older boat also did not take into account the savings realized by not decommissioning the older boat. I think it cost about half as much to decomission as it does to refit and refuel.
75 posted on 12/24/2003 12:29:40 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Commodore is an honorary title given to a captain who is either commanding a squadron of ships or subs or is holding down an admiral's post.
76 posted on 12/24/2003 12:48:08 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson (Eagle Scout class of 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson
Has there been any recent talk of bringing back the rank? What seems to be the objection to having the rank of Commodore-besides the fact congress would have to create it?
77 posted on 12/25/2003 12:22:45 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: RonaldSmythe
Now can you finish this quote?
Submariners Once!
Submariners Twice!...

Holy jumping jeebus christ!

:)

"We go up!
We go down!......."

It's OK if you don't take it past that. I was at the 1981 Submarine Birthday Ball in Norfolk. ComSubLant was there. About halfway into the evening (and the bag.) We all started the cheer. It faded into sort of an embarassed silence at about that point. One of my fellow reenactors, a TMCS(SS) and I almost got thrown out of the battle of Olustee, a few years back over that cheer. Submariners thrown out of a battle for being lewd, crude, rude, and socially unacceptable. Who could imagine?
79 posted on 12/31/2003 4:14:35 PM PST by 75thOVI (Qm1 (SS) Any ship can be a submarine.....................once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
Hate to say it, but the San Juan hit the that boomer back in 1998, they just cut out the portion of the hull and kept it in service. They do all of the necessary NDT testing and such to make sure it's good to go.

Hull repairs reduce structural integrity, and the 688 class was piss-poor to start with.

80 posted on 12/31/2003 4:33:45 PM PST by caltaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson