Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Disdain For The News Media Puzzles, Angers Many Journalists
USA Today ^ | 12-22-2003 | Peter Johnson

Posted on 12/22/2003 8:36:31 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Lyndon Johnson got so angry watching Walter Cronkite's CBS Evening News that he'd call during the broadcast and demand to speak to the anchor right then, while Cronkite was on the air.

In person, Johnson would get right in Cronkite's face, sometimes lifting up The Most Trusted Man in America by his lapels.

"He was a strong man," says Cronkite, 87. "I was sure my suits would give way before he did."

Today, President Bush's relations with the media are no less tense than Johnson's were during Vietnam, Richard Nixon's during Watergate and Bill Clinton's throughout Whitewater and the Monica Lewinsky affair.

But unlike his predecessors, analysts say, Bush openly brags about not reading newspapers, watching TV news or TV newsmagazines - dismissing the news media as unworthy of his time.

"I get my news from people who don't editorialize," Bush told ABC's Diane Sawyer last week. "They give me the actual news, and it makes it easier to digest, on a daily basis, the facts."

"It's the old MBA thing: 'Give me the five points, the nut graph,' " says veteran CBS White House correspondent Bill Plante. He says this is one of the most secretive administrations ever - highly distrustful of the media.

Bush's wife, Laura, told Sawyer she read newspapers and columnists and tells her husband what they are saying.

CBS White House correspondent Mark Knoller says that getting the news from his wife or aides seems to work for Bush. "We very rarely catch him unaware of something in the way that we used to catch Ronald Reagan. He is a very well-informed president."

And a deliberate one. Questioned at a recent press conference about a critical New York Times editorial about Vice President Cheney, Bush dismissed that influential editorial page, saying he never read it. And at last week's ceremonies honoring the Wright brothers' first flight, Bush took a dig at the Times, noting that it opined after the first flight that man was not destined to fly. "He enjoyed that a lot," Knoller says. The Times had no comment.

Bush may in part be playing to people who have distrusted the media ever since the Watergate days, when Vice President Spiro Agnew railed against the media's "nattering nabobs of negativity."

Cronkite thinks Bush may be exaggerating how little attention he pays to the media. "It's a defensive move. It must be very hard to have every move you make put under the microscope."

But that goes with the job and "it's difficult to understand why a president who spends so much time promoting the virtues of democracy would want to insulate himself from one of democracy's most important institutions, namely, a free and independent press," says Stanford University journalism professor Ted Glasser.

"One of the great ways to learn about America is by reading a newspaper on your own, whether it's the letters to the editors or anything else," says Tom Rosenstiel of the Project for Excellence in Journalism. "It makes you wonder if the only people he is talking to are people who work for him or agree with him and whether everything he sees about America he learns through them or through the window of a motorcade. One of the few ways to not do that is to read a newspaper or watch TV."

Says Playboy editor James Kaminsky: "It's appalling to think that the man who runs the country somehow finds time for a long gym workout each day, but can't muster up the intellectual curiosity to peruse the newspaper. Is it laziness, arrogance or a willful combination of the two? Does the president really need a human filter to deliver only news the White House staff thinks he wants to hear? Do gossip items sometimes get thrown into the daily 'readings'? How about the funnies? How hard is it to watch the damn TV news, even while working out?"


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bias; bush; media; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2003 8:36:36 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
C'mon, this is really from The Onion, right?

(steely)

2 posted on 12/22/2003 8:40:59 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I'm with Bush on this, especially when it comes to the NY Slimes.
3 posted on 12/22/2003 8:41:08 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
What that whazoo-aperture, Mr. James Kaminsky, does not realize is that what is being put on TV as 'news' really isn't. It's infotainment or propaganda.
4 posted on 12/22/2003 8:41:32 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only recent good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Fools.

Bush watches the Snooze and reads the papers.

But he pulls this Ike stuff to make the press think he's just a dummy.

And they will fall for it, hook, line, and sinker.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

5 posted on 12/22/2003 8:42:39 PM PST by section9 (Major Kusanagi says, "Click on my pic and read my blog, or eat lead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
What this guy misses is that with the internet and cable tv there are a lot of alternatives to the biased evening news on the major networks and to the N Y Times. They are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

Which is good.

6 posted on 12/22/2003 8:44:25 PM PST by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
a free and independent press

Free and independent yes but certainly not unbiased.

7 posted on 12/22/2003 8:44:29 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
With the majority of what the 'Rat Media says about the man, I really can't blame him for not reading any newspapers; as for the snotty comment made by the Smut-er-I mean Playboy editor, Mr. Bush has better things to do with his time than read the snide and crass things you all often print about him--and by the way, Ms. Editor, the man DOES read. Besides, when you read most of what are supposed to be 'news stories', you're reading the Editor's opionions as opposed to the facts about any given subject--notably the way Mr. Bush is running the country.

-Regards, T.
8 posted on 12/22/2003 8:45:27 PM PST by T Lady (Who Let the 'RATS Out?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Says Playboy editor James Kaminsky: "It's appalling to think that the man who runs the country somehow finds time for a long gym workout each day, but can't muster up the intellectual curiosity to peruse the newspaper. Is it laziness, arrogance or a willful combination of the two? Does the president really need a human filter to deliver only news the White House staff thinks he wants to hear? Do gossip items sometimes get thrown into the daily 'readings'? How about the funnies? How hard is it to watch the damn TV news, even while working out?"

Money paragraph here. It has the full-blown self-importance of the old media, delivered with anger and scorn by a proud pornographer. And the media left wonders why America thinks they're out of touch, instead of Bush.

9 posted on 12/22/2003 8:45:40 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
File this one under "C" - as in Cry Me a Frickin' River...
10 posted on 12/22/2003 8:46:10 PM PST by dirtboy (New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

11 posted on 12/22/2003 8:46:46 PM PST by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Gee, too bad all the people who really know how to run the country are too busy editing freshman essays on dorm policy or snapping pictures of naked waitresses.
12 posted on 12/22/2003 8:47:08 PM PST by wizardoz ("Let's roll!" ........................................................ "We got him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
" When you ARE the news, you don't have to read it"..GW BUSH.

Ok, I made that up.

13 posted on 12/22/2003 8:47:17 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Dean, a constant critic of the war now left looking like a monkey whose organ grinder had run away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
So what does the New York Times have that the President's Daily Brief doesn't?
14 posted on 12/22/2003 8:48:13 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
A further dissection of the money paragraph:

Does the president really need a human filter to deliver only news the White House staff thinks he wants to hear?

The guy only gets his info straight from the leading intel agencies in the country - but somehow his worldview would be improved by reading Playboy (only for the articles, of course...)

15 posted on 12/22/2003 8:48:38 PM PST by dirtboy (New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
So what does the New York Times have that the President's Daily Brief doesn't?

The stuff they use to grow mushrooms...

16 posted on 12/22/2003 8:50:17 PM PST by dirtboy (New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
These guys just don't get how irrelevant they have become to many, if not most, Americans. Their claims to be "influential" or important are where the real arrogance lies.

Once, when I was refusing a telephone solicitation offering me a free subscription to the local rag I was asked "how do you find out what is going on ?". I answered, "I know what's going on. It's just different stuff than you know. "

The great newsrooms of the past have been replaced by "journalistic enterprises" staffed by a bunch of college re-educated former hall monitors who spend much of their time interviewing each other between visits to their shrinks working out the issues that caused them to get their a$$es kicked so much in high school. Why would anyone with important things to get done take them seriously ?
17 posted on 12/22/2003 8:52:08 PM PST by prov1813man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I count it as a positive that the C-in-C isn't wasting his time reading the stuff that passes for journalism these days. Post 13 sums it up pretty well.
18 posted on 12/22/2003 8:52:09 PM PST by squidly (Although prepared for martyrdom, I prefer that it be postponed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I'll answer that: Their snotty, rotten, and mean-spirited attitude towards him, or something else they don't like-like the clearing out of forest dead wood or missile defense, or the military-disguised as 'reporting'.

-Regards, T.
19 posted on 12/22/2003 8:52:23 PM PST by T Lady (Who Let the 'RATS Out?!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
this should be good - bump - on my way to view a Manger Scene!
20 posted on 12/22/2003 8:52:50 PM PST by malia (BUSH/CHENEY '04 *A Cherished Constitutional right - the right to vote and have it counted - once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson