To: relee
I will say, one thing I am concerned about is that the capture of Saddam "triggered" the release of some kind of failsafe chain of custody for anthrax stocks within the US. That is alot more feasible then a nuke, since we know they have anthrax and the 2001 attacks were likely AQ also. Anthrax is easy to transport and store.
There are alot of anthrax "experts" here on FR, they always gather on the anthrax threads, I wonder what they think about this? Maybe someone could ping some of them.
To: oceanview
Yeah, Ridge speaking of AQ still wanting to use planes as a weapon makes me wonder if they are thinking more of using planes as a dilevery system(anthrax?) rather than a projectile.
841 posted on
12/21/2003 4:24:15 PM PST by
Diddle E. Squat
(www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
To: oceanview
Have you seen FNC today? On the trail of Osama? He saw a plane fly overhead and scrambled into his hole. Alot of news out about him today also.
843 posted on
12/21/2003 4:24:28 PM PST by
JustPiper
(Following the course of least resistance makes for crooked rivers and crooked men)
To: oceanview
re: your 825. That thought did cross my mind also, re: Saddam and the anthrax.
926 posted on
12/21/2003 5:08:52 PM PST by
riri
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson