Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clark's fading credibility
Boston.com ^ | December 21 2003 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 12/21/2003 6:03:50 AM PST by knighthawk

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WESLEY CLARK, the four-star general who commanded US forces in Europe during the Kosovo war, is running for president as an opponent of the war in Iraq. So what will he say, a questioner asks, when the Bush camp levels the obvious criticism: If General Clark had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power. "If General Clark had his way," the candidate instantly replies, "we'd have had Osama bin Laden dead or alive two years ago, and the world would have been a lot safer. And then we'd have used the United Nations to go after Saddam Hussein the right way."


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; credibility; fading; jeffjacoby; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2003 6:03:51 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
Ping
2 posted on 12/21/2003 6:04:06 AM PST by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Jacoby had better be careful. If he keeps this up Clark is likely to beat the s*** out of him.
3 posted on 12/21/2003 6:10:33 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
good article - thanks
4 posted on 12/21/2003 6:10:43 AM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Wes Clark is a monster from hell (Clinton's hell).
5 posted on 12/21/2003 6:13:39 AM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
clark and the rest haven't a chance. clark reminds of dukakis in that the more you see of him the less you like, and he was 17 points up on bush 41.

and now jfKerry has mortgaged his home, the leno-cycle and f-word stunts having failed to attain traction.

i think it's a waste of time to even think about the D-party field.

6 posted on 12/21/2003 6:14:45 AM PST by dadokane (Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts. HATE OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"If General Wesley Clark had his way, we'd have had Osama bin Laden dead or alive two years ago."

What an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. Clark can't rewrite history, nor can he predict how things would've gone if he'd been in charge. These DEM candidates never fail to amuse me. They stick their feet in their mouths at almost every chance they get.
7 posted on 12/21/2003 6:16:44 AM PST by Gunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Even for a commander who was first in his class at West Point, that doesn't seem like a strategy for victory.

Is this true? General Clark certainly doesn't give the impression when he speaks of being very intelligent at all. He seems inarticulate and confused to me, throwing out cliches instead of measured remarks.

8 posted on 12/21/2003 6:17:59 AM PST by Tired_of_the_Lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Awwwww gimme a Break to say that Clark had credibility to begin with is a stretch to mention he had it is the only credibility hes ever gotten the president he worked under even shat canned him and of course he gets some credit for almost starting WWIII! with the Russians

Hes got that and a fancy hat to piss and moan in thats about it !

9 posted on 12/21/2003 6:21:32 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (A nation of sheep will eventually beget a government of wolves !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; GRRRRR; RedBloodedAmerican; Ragtime Cowgirl; mhking; anniegetyourgun; Howlin; ...
NON-credibility goosepimple
10 posted on 12/21/2003 6:22:41 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (A nation of sheep will eventually beget a government of wolves !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gunder
"They stick their feet in their mouths at almost every chance they get."

...and the dupes keep on supporting them and voting for them...sigh

11 posted on 12/21/2003 6:27:26 AM PST by Thom Pain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
How can Weasely Clark's credibility fade, when it never was?
12 posted on 12/21/2003 6:39:23 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
For later reference.
13 posted on 12/21/2003 6:44:47 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
On Aug. 27, 1994, when he was a three-star general working for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Clark paid a visit to Mladic in Bosnia. In so doing, The Washington Post reported, he "ignored State Department warnings not to meet with Serb officials suspected of ordering deaths of civilians." Clark says he wanted to get Mladic's views for a policy paper he was writing and thought he had permission to do so.

Either way, Clark did more than take notes. The two men drank wine and posed for jovial pictures that showed them merrily wearing each other's caps. Mladic plied Clark with other gifts, too -- a bottle of brandy and a pistol inscribed "From General Mladic." It was like "Ike going to Berlin while the Germans were besieging Leningrad," one disgusted commentator wrote, "and having schnapps with Hermann Goering."

Here's the Perfumed Prince in all his glory. The Clintons handpicked candidate is a total boob.

More good info on the mass murderers good friend here:

The Perfumed Prince Report

Wanted poster by Interpol: MLADIC, Ratko

14 posted on 12/21/2003 6:53:12 AM PST by Reagan is King (The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
But Clark has had extensive experience in the Balkans and ought to know something about capturing international war criminals.

Under the theory "it takes one to know one"?

15 posted on 12/21/2003 7:09:04 AM PST by thoughtomator (The Federal judiciary is a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Clark's Fading Credibility

Clarks fading credibility? That faint remnant burned out years ago.

16 posted on 12/21/2003 7:39:56 AM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dadokane
A month or more ago it became public that Kerry was mortgaging his posh Beacon Hill home to fund his loser campaign. Is the one reported this week a second mortgage loan? Did 'Lovie' as he calls the missus, immediately pay off the first loan? If so, presumably he could do this to funnel money to himself ad infinitum.
17 posted on 12/21/2003 7:45:52 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Just more evidence of Clark's inconsistency. As the author notes here, Clark begrudged the multilateral approach of having to deal with France, and their suspected interests...not to mention his disagreement with the UK's Sir Michael Jackson. In his own book, Clark speaks of how having this "multilateral" agreement only caused friction with the interested parties...and how these "European attitudes" frustrated his mission. So...after having witnessed this mess first-hand, how can Clark than turn around and demand Bush get international approval and support, when even he acknowledges the incompetence of these "international" alliances?
18 posted on 12/21/2003 8:08:24 AM PST by cwb (ç†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Clark is a loser in more ways than politically.
19 posted on 12/21/2003 8:56:31 AM PST by Gritty ("How about the left's war on poverty? When are we getting an exit strategy on that?" - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
Are you trying to muddy the waters with logic?
20 posted on 12/21/2003 9:06:58 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson