Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wes Clark talks about General Sir Micheal Jackson WW3 comment.
My meeting with Wes Clark today | December 20,2003 | Katherine Prudhomme-O'Brien

Posted on 12/20/2003 12:22:50 PM PST by KPfromDerryNH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: Headfulofghosts
Have you noticed how the CIA is often made to carry the blame for other people's decisions?
41 posted on 12/20/2003 12:53:17 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
If someone in the US should 'hurt' his feelings, what would Clark do?

Waco gives an answer, doesn't it?

42 posted on 12/20/2003 12:54:55 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Hmmmm..
Janeane Garafolo said that no-one protested Clinton's illegal war since it wasn't fashionable to do so.
Basically the Left admits to administration by fashion fiat.

And there's no way Clark will answer any questions about bypassing the UN.
Too many tough questions for him.
43 posted on 12/20/2003 12:56:00 PM PST by Darksheare (The gophers of vengeance are upon you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KPfromDerryNH
If he DOES let you anywhere near him next time (hah!), stay "undercover". Just play the innocent soccer-mom type and don't comment too much. Ask leading questions while staring at him with adoring eyes.

Then report his answers back to us. You will then be honored as a member of FR's "Deep Throat" unit and will be awarded the Freeper Eagle for Deaninguished Service.

Leni

44 posted on 12/20/2003 12:56:45 PM PST by MinuteGal (Florida Freepers! Go to Fla. chapter forum for important announcements on chapter re-organization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
It just shows you what asses, the democrats are. If the UN and the so-called "international community" are so important, why is it that when GH Bush put together one of the largest coalitions in the world (1991 GW)...with full UN support, only 10 Senate democats supported the president in that war? These people talk out of both sides of their ass, just so they can oppose a Republican.
45 posted on 12/20/2003 12:59:02 PM PST by cwb (ç†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Clark was connected to Shinseki, Hackworth, McCaffrey and a few other Bush haters during the war. He spewed their garbage for them.

Clark also helped raise money for the GOP in 2001, was at republican fundraiser where he praised Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney and Rice and implied that he had voted for Bush himself not to mention also taking a subtle shot at gore.

He has obviousley since retracted, but the videotape is hillarious.

46 posted on 12/20/2003 12:59:27 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I'm pretty sure that'd be what he'd do.
Making a small side trip and connecting some dots, Shinseki spouted nothing but love and admiration for Clark at one point.
Shinseki brainstorms the Stryker which is useless in a combat environment without paved roads.
He also makes a civilian police version of the Stryker as a selling point. (Called something like the Stryker CCV or some stupid focus group junk)
The Stryker is vulnerable to .50 cal weaponry.
There's just been struck down a ban on same calibur weaponry.
The U.S. has lots of paved roads for the Stryker to travel on.

Hopefully, none of this will ever be tested out.
And hopefully the dots won't be connected in a way that makes it useable against the populace.
47 posted on 12/20/2003 1:01:19 PM PST by Darksheare (The gophers of vengeance are upon you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Great post. I love the transcript..and the way they tried to limit Slobo's cross-exam. And Democrats want these people "trying" our soldiers and politicians...give me a break.
48 posted on 12/20/2003 1:01:32 PM PST by cwb (ç†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Destro
God I sure hope someone starts asking him tough questions.
49 posted on 12/20/2003 1:02:04 PM PST by Darksheare (The gophers of vengeance are upon you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
Your tax dollars at work. You are paying for this travesty of justice.
50 posted on 12/20/2003 1:02:30 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Headfulofghosts
The Chinese embasssy was bombed intentionally, by the CIA, because they had info that the Chinese were arming and helping Milosovic. As I recall, some people were fired for this? But, in reality, the mission was carried out.

There have been rumors about the reasons for the chinese embassy bombing for a long time, one of the biggest ones is that Clark did it intentionally in an attempt to widen the war. i.e. he nuts and wants to start ww3.

51 posted on 12/20/2003 1:02:41 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: KPfromDerryNH; doug from upland
Way to go, Katherine! You are one of FR's finest!
52 posted on 12/20/2003 1:03:55 PM PST by kayak (Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
That is true, look what Clinton and his cronies, did to the CIA. Look into the Torricilli PRinciple ( Deutch Principle)and you can see some of our problems there. Clinton and friends made our best agents either retire or be forced out, and these men and women spoke Arabic, he also made the CIA inept for an entire year, following sensitivity training. In reality, former CIA dir,. Deutch should be tried, with treason for his illegally storing info and other serious blowbacks, yet he gets off with a presidental pardon. Interesting, when you consider the fact that Wen Ho Lee, was being tried around the same time, he was humiliated and Deutch get's off with a pardon. Once again the powerful protecting the powerful! After 9-11, the CIA was told to get tough, the did in Iraq with the WMD.
53 posted on 12/20/2003 1:04:14 PM PST by Headfulofghosts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KPfromDerryNH
Hot damn, a fifty-year-old confirmed bachelor done fell in love. Okay, okay, being fat and ugly and divorced also has something to do with it . . . but for the most part I just haven't found the woman of my dreams. Then I read your thread and, like an acne-scarred teenager window-peeping on the head cheerleader, I hurry off to your homepage and, alas, I think I discovered you're already taken. Darn it.

LOL.

You got MOJO, girlfrand. Keep it up! I can see the stupefied look on Bubba-Jean Clark's face now.

54 posted on 12/20/2003 1:04:18 PM PST by geedee (Liberals tend to worry about right and left and leave the right and wrong for others to sort out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geedee; KPfromDerryNH
Guts.
Lotsa guts.
Hats off from this former soldier.
55 posted on 12/20/2003 1:05:39 PM PST by Darksheare (The gophers of vengeance are upon you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
The recent article on Weasely in the New Yorker made it clear that McCaffrey advanced Clark's career at key points in the 1990's. The article does not mention the presidential influence that I understand was involved in his last 3 promotions (J-5 and three stars, SOUTHCOM and four stars, SACEUR).
56 posted on 12/20/2003 1:07:02 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Clark’s presidential decision suggests that he believes the media will not ask him about supporting the same extremist Muslim forces in Kosovo that militarily attacked us on 9/11. He’s right:

No he's not right. The scope of media coverage has changed and that change has been proven to be appealing to the public.

They are all worse than hypocrites.

As has been proven thus the change in media coverage to the "fair and balanced" approach as demanded by the public.

The likes of "Smiling Katie" are squirming also.

57 posted on 12/20/2003 1:07:22 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Hmm.
Also makes Clark sound like a brown nosing over-inflated ego weasel.
Definately not good at all.
58 posted on 12/20/2003 1:09:04 PM PST by Darksheare (The gophers of vengeance are upon you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KPfromDerryNH
" For example, there is the 1993 siege of David Koresh's Mount Carmel commune in Waco, Texas, where four law-enforcement officers were killed and nearly 90 civilians - men, women and children - massacred by being shot and/or burned alive.

Those seeking an investigation of his part in the Waco outrage say that Clark not only played a hidden role in the military-style assault on the Branch Davidians, but easily could have refused to participate in what was a clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (but he didn't) that bars use of the U.S. military for civilian law-enforcement activities."

The above is a quote from This Article

59 posted on 12/20/2003 1:09:05 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KPfromDerryNH
Then a guy from Clarks campaign wanted my name and phone # so he could follow up with me.

I hope you didn't give him your name or phone #, his people are Clinton's people and they have a way of getting even with those who question them.

60 posted on 12/20/2003 1:09:32 PM PST by CharlesI (They're not liberals, they're leftists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson