Posted on 12/20/2003 10:23:46 AM PST by UnklGene
Watch out for 'Playboyism' -
William F. Buckley
December 19, 2003
Rush Limbaugh was talking about religion as also, that very day, Sean Hannity. One day earlier Christie Hefner was celebrating the 50th anniversary of Playboy.
Rush said listen to this, folks, Catholic voters tended over the years to go Democratic, but there has been a slide toward the GOP in recent elections, and one-third of U.S. Catholics are now thought of as swing voters. That means — Limbaugh discussed the point with a guest — that state and court action on the matter of gay marriage will certainly affect many Catholic voters, and if they view government as laggard on the question, they will continue to move to the right. Sean Hannity said that he was himself Catholic and that he attends a church which on Sundays is standing room only. He attributes this in part to God, but mostly to his pastor, who, says Hannity, is rigorous in his defense of Christian doctrines, forswearing temptations to truckle to modernism. He too thought that the evolution of the gay marriage business would be politically important.
Christie Hefner was acknowledged by her host as the executive successor to her father, Hugh Hefner, the founder of Playboy magazine. She was asked what mostly was she proud about in Playboy, and she answered that her magazine had done a great deal to foster liberal ideas. Her interlocutor more or less cooed his agreement on the point.
Playboy of course publishes much material (I have written extensively for it) unrelated to sexual matters, and although it is emphatically heterosexual, Rush Limbaugh would be correct if he guessed that it would endorse gay marriage. The reason here is that the Playboy philosophy is permissive on all points that have to do with sexual predilections (though minors are not allowed). Jane and Carol want to live together? Let them. If the priest who addresses the congregation where Hannity worships speaks out against gay marriage, just hang on for a bit. Things will change.
And the Playboy philosophy has every reason to believe it will be so. The Playboy Channel on television regularly displays scenes not even Abercrombie & Fitch would dare to put into their catalogues. Rush reminds us that we are a nation of churchgoers. Yes, that's true, if comparisons are being drawn to other nations.
What isn't so clear is that church attendance induces Christian behavior. This is the year in which that point struck home sizzlingly, when priests, not laymen, were detected doing dirty things with children. Sean Hannity acknowledges the especially depressing picture of pedophile priests, but of course the question becomes: Are churchgoers being correctly instructed on matters of permissible behavior?
David Morris of ABC News has a word on this point. "Even as they express admiration for the man, majorities in the Pope's American flock reject a variety of his teachings, say he hasn't influenced their views — even on religious matters — and see the Roman Catholic Church as out of step with their lives." Catholics practice birth control at about the same rate as non-Catholics. Sixty percent of Catholics say okay to premarital sex, and almost one half say okay to homosexual relationships.
The clear winner on the scene is Hugh Hefner. Going to church has become one more exercise in permissive behavior. Go ahead on to church, but be careful not to get in the way of Playboyism when you step back from the church to — real life.
What can the Christian hope for? Well, as once ventured in another cloudy situation, God might clear his throat. That is a fine metaphor, God stilling the storm, raising someone from the grave, eliminating AIDS for Christmas. But the believer knows that it doesn't work that way. You must believe in miracles, but it is wrong to expect them. Besides, miracles would certainly be rejected as unconstitutional by People for the American Way. Merry Christmas.
Spiritual descendants of the Pharisees who, against the evidence of their own eyes, disbelieved Jesus' healing of the man born blind (John 9).
Yes, let's clarify the language:
They're not the 'unborn,' they're the preborn!
It's not 'premarital' sex, it's non-marital sex!
And also, 'gay marriage' is an oxymoron!
No, it's not -- it's a ceremony with lots of joy and happiness. It's time to stop using a perfectly good word like 'gay' for 'queer'.
Queer marriage is an oxymoron!
Not to defend "liberal" philosophy, which I despise, but I don't consider it to be supportive of hedonism. For instance, the entire raison d'etre of Playboy, ogling naked females, is politically incorrect in the extreme.
After all, modern "liberal" philosophy encourages us to work together, unselfishly, in the service of the state, for the benefit of all, and under strict regulation of every aspect of our lives, at that.
However, I do think that the Left encourages hedonistic behavior in hopes that it may destroy American values (not because they themselves believe in it), so that they can then impose their own totalitarian values.
As a professed Catholic who frequently contributes to the sales of pornography, Mr. Buckley helped create the problem that he now so weakly laments. He is both a shameful hypocrite and an embarrassment to true conservative ideals. Furthermore, he knows that the religious affiliations in the tired statistics he throws about were self-reported and are biased in favor of the "cultural christians" who go out of their way to participate in these stupid surveys and skew the results toward their hedonistic behavior. Mr. Buckley knows better than this, but instead uses them in a fraudulent defense of his own scandalous behavior. Mr. Buckley's impending demise will be of no loss to the conservative movement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.