1 posted on
12/19/2003 9:22:34 PM PST by
RWR8189
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: RWR8189
bttt
To: RWR8189
Pretty good for a dumb ole cowboy!
3 posted on
12/19/2003 9:29:31 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: RWR8189; nopardons
One of Fred's best. Maybe because the news is so incredibly GOOD!
6 posted on
12/19/2003 9:34:16 PM PST by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: RWR8189
this is a keeper.
8 posted on
12/19/2003 9:59:00 PM PST by
King Prout
(...he took a face from the ancient gallery, then he... walked on down the hall....)
Hi Fred Barnes --
I'd add the signing of the anti-spam bill and do-not-call bill to your list, not to mention R'nold's win in California.
.
10 posted on
12/19/2003 10:04:17 PM PST by
Jackie
To: RWR8189
Bush had helpers like Federal Reserve chairman Alan GreenspanNot that I don't recognize the valuable job greenspan has done for the economy, but to my recollection, he had been much more active in adjusting interest rates during the clinton years than he has during bush's.
Recently, it seems rates have been more a matter of remaining steady than major changes or ongoing trends up or down. You dont seem to hear as much concern about "what will greenspan do"....maybe because people don't believe its as necessary or as much a factor as before.
11 posted on
12/19/2003 10:05:52 PM PST by
Optimist
(I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
To: RWR8189
The Lord Almighty is truly on GW Bush side.
13 posted on
12/19/2003 10:27:27 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: RWR8189
I predict that Saddam will become a cause celeb for the Left, the same way that they did with Mumia Abu-Jamal. I've even designed a t-shirt for them to wear when they protest. :^)
14 posted on
12/19/2003 10:48:46 PM PST by
Ouachita
To: RWR8189
As someone in his early 20's, please GW, I really don't want to have to pay into Social Security. Let's get it done.
15 posted on
12/19/2003 10:52:05 PM PST by
July 4th
(George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
To: RWR8189
Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, a top deputy to Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, had taped a radio statement, sneering at the prospects of seizing Saddam.Giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Durbin makes me sick!
16 posted on
12/19/2003 10:54:44 PM PST by
#3Fan
To: RWR8189
Hmmmmmm. Nope.
I still don't vote for Big Government politicians, of any stripe.
19 posted on
12/19/2003 11:06:55 PM PST by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
To: RWR8189
The demonrats play to their voters, high school drop outs, that believe that black churches were burning in Clinton's home town when he was a boy, etc.
They will easily buy the most outrageous statements, so demonrat candidates don't have to worry if they sound psycotic to thinking people as long as they sound angry and concerned to their pitiful constituients.
To: RWR8189
Congressman Jim McDermott of Washington suggested Saddam was ripe for seizure any time and Bush had planned the event for political gainAnd let's not forget about Mad-Maddie Halfwit and her question to Mort Kondracke about Bush hiding away Osama!
As one freeper quipped the other night, Albright might as well have accused Bush of, "finding Jimmy Hoffa's body, Amelia Earhart's crash sight, and the cure for cancer right before the 2004 election". She is one pathetic creature.
22 posted on
12/19/2003 11:16:35 PM PST by
thesummerwind
(like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
To: RWR8189
What a great article!
31 posted on
12/19/2003 11:41:30 PM PST by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: RWR8189
BTTT! God bless our President!
35 posted on
12/20/2003 12:25:23 AM PST by
Prime Choice
(Leftist opinions may be free, but I still feel like I'm getting ripped off every time I receive one.)
To: RWR8189
ping~
36 posted on
12/20/2003 12:50:24 AM PST by
lainde
To: RWR8189
Democrats exuded an air of unreality. They called for the United Nations to assume a bigger role in Iraq just days after Secretary General Kofi Annan announced the United Nations had no intention of doing that. They said Bush should recruit more foreign troops to replace American soldiers in Iraq. But there was no evidence any country was prepared to dispatch troops.
I think that the Democraps know that much of what they are "calling for" isn't feasible. My guess is that they're just doing it to create talking points, "We urged this President on multiple occasions to go to the UN, to replace American troops with foreign troops, and so on.." One of the other things that they've "called for" as nauseam is more troops. I heard Dick Morris say that he believed the request for more troops was really an effort to make President Bush reinstate the draft (we're already using reserves). Has anyone else heard this? Does anyone else subscribe to that theory? It's an interesting thought because aside from partisan political gain, there is no logical reason for all of the Assrabbits to keep parroting "more troops....more troops....more troops......."
37 posted on
12/20/2003 1:22:55 AM PST by
Jaysun
(Get real, Control-Everybody-But-Yourselves freaks!)
To: RWR8189
I also think when election season really begins (when the Bush team engages) that the RATs are going to pay a price for their judicial obstructionism.
38 posted on
12/20/2003 1:36:51 AM PST by
Aeronaut
(In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
To: RWR8189
President Bush is brilliant, and what's more, he's brilliant FOR us! For OUR security, OUR prosperity, OUR well-being!
39 posted on
12/20/2003 1:42:51 AM PST by
WaterDragon
(GWB is The MAN!)
To: RWR8189; #3Fan
First Durbin.....I can't stand the guy. I wrote a polite but direct letter to him regarding the judicial nominees/filibuster ..... never received so much as a form letter in return.
As for the accomplishments of the Administration and President..... the dems continue to "misunderestimate" the "stratergery". Failing any bad turn of events, I suspect the perfect storm is brewing for the democrats in 2004. The shift will be seismic - in the presidential election and congress. It will be as much the President's doing as it will be the dems. The map on election night will be red, baby!
Lando
42 posted on
12/20/2003 4:22:35 AM PST by
Lando Lincoln
(The Vermin had vermin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson