Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rangel: "Is there any evidence that the rat in the hole coordinated resistance?"
Hannity and Colmes

Posted on 12/18/2003 6:12:12 PM PST by Political Junkie Too

Rangel is asking "Is there any evidence that the rat in the hole coordinated resistance?" He's calling Saddam a "bum."

I say that, on the face of it, there may be evidence that he did NOT coordinate the resistance, given his appearance and where/how he was found. Even THAT is important information to know.

What Rangel is not saying is that if we hadn't gotten Saddam, Rangel would be running around still claiming that Saddam WAS coordinating the resistance. Now that we have him, Rangel is saying that there is no evidence that he was coordinating the resistance. I say there is value in suspecting that he wasn't coordinating the resistance because we can now eliminate that possibility and move on to other alternatives.

They want it both ways.

-PJ


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: friendofsaddam; rangel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2003 6:12:13 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Bottom line: Charlie Rangel IS a rat.
2 posted on 12/18/2003 6:15:03 PM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Did you hear what Rangel said on an open mic when they were going to the first commercial break?

He started by saying "This program is a ..." and I did not catch the rest, but it did not sound like something good.
3 posted on 12/18/2003 6:15:05 PM PST by Ham Hock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
GrrrrrrRrrrangle!
4 posted on 12/18/2003 6:15:38 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ham Hock
No, I missed it.
5 posted on 12/18/2003 6:15:58 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ham Hock
To clarify, It did not sound like something good due to the tone of his voice, even though I could not hear what he said.
6 posted on 12/18/2003 6:16:09 PM PST by Ham Hock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Well they got good intel from that hole and have taken other mooks into custody because of it. In fact they are running an op today I believe based on intel that rathole Hussein had with him. Evidently Charlie is wrong again.
7 posted on 12/18/2003 6:16:31 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
...and he represents Harlem. Rangel's a rat in a hellhole. I suppose he knows of what he speaks.
8 posted on 12/18/2003 6:16:32 PM PST by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Rangle is a schmuck. Nothing done under a Republican administration would please him. Bush could pass every socialist program he has been wanting passed for years, and he would still not be happy with it. He makes me glad my tv remote has a 'mute' button. I can't stand the bloviating buffoon.
9 posted on 12/18/2003 6:17:03 PM PST by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Here is Rangels proof...


10 posted on 12/18/2003 6:18:37 PM PST by smith288 ("We're going to have the happiest Christmas since Bing Crosby tap danced with Danny F'n Kay")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
GAD! I'm glad I wasn't the only one watching this.

I'd love to have taken Sean's chair against the peacenik....

(No offense, Sean)
11 posted on 12/18/2003 6:19:00 PM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I notice how they love to spin the bad news, but they show their intellectual dishonesty in doing so.

Last week, Colmes was debating Bush's refusal to allow France, Germany, and Russia to receive Iraq contracts. Colmes phrased the question, "Is it right to exclude countries who chose not to get involved in the war?" I was yelling at the TV "But they did choose to get involved -- they got involved on the OTHER SIDE!!"

-PJ

12 posted on 12/18/2003 6:19:21 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
He makes me glad my tv remote has a 'mute' button.

To tell you the truth, I'd rather watch Rangle blather than watch the Jacko segment coming up! LOL

13 posted on 12/18/2003 6:20:02 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Bad Time Charlie's got the blues.
14 posted on 12/18/2003 6:21:38 PM PST by Argus ((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
According to reports, some of the papers Saddam had with him in his hole included names of some insurgent leaders in Bagdad.

Also, the papers had names of some insurgents who had infiltrated into the Iraqi Council and military installations (as translators, helpers, etc.)
15 posted on 12/18/2003 6:22:06 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus
Sheila Jackson Lee?? Quannel X?!?!

THIS is going to be good!

Ping some lists here!
16 posted on 12/18/2003 6:22:46 PM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Rangel reminds me of old Irish pols from Boston, partisan always but always common man and common sense. And he is right. Sadaam controlled nothing but about two guys who guarded him and he and them may have been held captive once in the hole and sold out to us.

It doesn't matter anyway if Rangel is right. The POTUS said that Sadaam's capture would mean nothing to ending attacks against our troops in Iraq.

17 posted on 12/18/2003 6:23:03 PM PST by Burkeman1 ("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Charlie Rangel didn't coordinate resistance, but he surely encouraged it, as did his liberal pals....
18 posted on 12/18/2003 6:24:01 PM PST by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Sure. The American opposition wants to make Hussein and bin Laden out to be bogeymen until they are found, and then they want to diminish their importance once we find them.

-PJ

19 posted on 12/18/2003 6:24:48 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Sheila thinks Assad is responding to terrorists because of folks like her making nice!
20 posted on 12/18/2003 6:25:42 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson