Skip to comments.
(3-judge panel, 9th Circuit) Rules ALL GITMO detainees must have access to an attorney
Fox
Posted on 12/18/2003 11:46:39 AM PST by Dog
AP via Fox news alert..
Lord help us from the judges..
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; courts; detainees; gitmo; jihadinamerica; judges; oligarchy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 321-323 next last
To: hobbes1
Why not combine the two court cases and state that only terrorists are free to have a political voice close to an election?
To: T. P. Pole
"How does the 9th circuit even have jurisdiction to make a ruling in this case?"
Brother of a detainee lives in the Central District of California, and is petitioner in the application. [It's all in the opinion]
To: Poohbah
Can't say that doesn't sound good. ;-)
123
posted on
12/18/2003 12:24:48 PM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Sending the Ba'thist to the showers! ;-)
To: Dog
I see the 9th Circus is in full beserker/sedition mode today.....
To: Dog
The prisoners need to be freed in time to help Deanie Weenie with his campaign....
125
posted on
12/18/2003 12:26:12 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(You know that KoolAid the RATs are drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's pissing in it.)
To: KantianBurke
Lincoln on the Merryman case. "Let Taney (Chief Justice)
enforce his order".
To: Dog
If I recall, Reinhardt was also the 9th Circus judge who tried to throw out the California recall election in September.
To: RonF
Meaningless, except that it's a step along the way for SCOTUS to make the final ruling.
God help us! You can bet that SCOTUS will use it to take away another right from us.
To: Dog
So between Al-Queda and Bill Clinton controlling most of the judiciary, why bother fighting the WOT any more?
129
posted on
12/18/2003 12:27:27 PM PST
by
Beck_isright
(This tag line edited by the 9th Circuit Court due to offensive political commentary)
To: Bikers4Bush
On to the supremes.
Boo HISS HISS!
To: guardian_of_liberty
By all means. I'd be honored.
131
posted on
12/18/2003 12:28:29 PM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
"Why don't we just start line'n up & let these scumbag muslim sh*theads just take us out? WTF is going on in this country?" The same thing that was going on in Spain during the Spanish Inquisition. After finally throwing off the yoke of centuries of Islamic rule, the King & Queen found their country was infiltrated with Muslim "converts", (false converts whose role it was to infiltrate and destroy Spain from within). Hence, the Inquisition to feret out 'heretics' was launched. Of course, 'heretic' was merely the official cover name they used to rid themselves of anti-Spanish infiltrators, spies and subversives. Our judicial system is brimming over with these types of fraudulent "Americans". We need a sort of counter-Inquisition to identify and impeach these subversive "Justices". They are usurping their Constitutional authority and overthrowing our nation from within.
To: Bikers4Bush
On to the supremes. yeah, now that is comforting.
133
posted on
12/18/2003 12:31:42 PM PST
by
riri
To: You Dirty Rats
Does the 9th circuit ITSELF lie within the bounds of the United States? It certainly doesn't abide in the bounds of logic, reason, fact, or law.
134
posted on
12/18/2003 12:33:59 PM PST
by
alancarp
(Support Diversity: Hire a Neanderthal)
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Sandra Day O'Connor will probably hold that they are entitled to access to U.S. Courts for 20 years and after that it will not be necessary.
To: omega4412
Unfortunately, the one time a President stood up to the Supreme Court, the Court was right.
The Indian Removal Act was a travesty and a robbery veiled as an Act of Congress. Jackson was wrong.
The Indian Removal Act
The Fugitive Slave Act
Dred Scott
Yeah, the pre Civil War South was real big on individual rights... Bull****!
136
posted on
12/18/2003 12:34:35 PM PST
by
GreenLanternCorps
(WHO DEY! WHO DEY! WHO DEY THINK GONNA BEAT DEM BENGALS!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Abundy; sinkspur
Once they were transported to US soil (GITMO qualifies) they are afforded due-process protections of the Constitution. Just like the 9th Circus Court you are wrong, wrong, wrong:
GITMO does not qualify as US soil because the lease establishing the base in 1903 and re-established in 1934 upholds Cuban sovereignty of the land the base is on.
The US has neither Territorial Jurisdiction nor Sovereign Jurisdiction, we merely have 'Jurisdiction and Control'--in that we can exercise jurisdiction over crimes occuring ON that land and restrict access to that land.
Now take that tablecloth off your head...
To: Dog
Those losers in the 9th never quit!
138
posted on
12/18/2003 12:34:48 PM PST
by
demlosers
(Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
To: Dog Gone
Yup. I live here and am not worried. If some other circuit had said this, I'd be worried. But not about ANY 9th Circuit opinion.
139
posted on
12/18/2003 12:35:12 PM PST
by
Thud
To: KantianBurke
What the hell? they're not US citizens! They are terrorists and thus aren't covered by the Geneva Accords. Nor the US Constitution.....
140
posted on
12/18/2003 12:35:38 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Do it your way - just don't come crying to me when it doesn't work!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 321-323 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson