Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The left has taken over the Democratic Party (Good Editorial)
Hill News ^ | 12/18/03 | Dick Morris

Posted on 12/18/2003 10:10:02 AM PST by areafiftyone

The probable nomination of former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean marks a turning point in the modern history of the Democratic Party. The left has taken over. The tail is no longer wagging the dog. The tail has mastered the beast.

The moderates ran the Democratic Party from 1960 to 1972. Then the left took over, ruling until 1992 — a period in which the party controlled the White House for only four out of 20 years, when Jimmy Carter, a moderate southerner, was president. Capitalizing on their failures, the centrists regained ascendancy in 1992 with the nomination of Bill Clinton. They ruled for 12 years and are losing power now.

Al Gore and Hillary Clinton are moving to the left to make their peace with the party’s new masters. Hillary goes to Iraq and then signs up for every Sunday talk show to blast President Bush and the war. Gore backs Dean to court favor with the liberal anti-war faction that has taken over. The Ralph Nader fringe is now in charge, and Gore is moving left to accommodate them.

How did the left take over? Yeats had the answer when he wrote that the “worst are filled with a passionate intensity” and that the center doesn’t hold. The war galvanized such activism among those who felt kicked out of the mainstream when they refused to join the flag-waving patriotism unleashed by the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that it empowered the left to take over the party.

Using the Internet to compensate for its lack of capital, the anti-war faction made its alliance with social liberals who were attracted by Dean’s approval of the gay civil union bill in Vermont. It is the equivalent for the left of the deal Ronald Reagan made with the Christian conservatives, signing them up for his crusade in the 1980 election.

This coalition of peace advocates and supporters of gay civil unions has mobilized online and amassed enough money, manpower and excitement to outdistance the conventional candidates in the Democratic field. They have taken over the party, and they are not planning on leaving anytime soon.

Their ascendancy is paralleled by the solidification of the Democratic minority in Congress, cemented in place by the 2001 reapportionment in which GOP leaders drew district lines to concentrate Democrats in Democratic districts and keep Republicans and independents in marginal areas.

The result has been an inoculation of Democratic congressmen against defeat in general elections. But, with huge numbers of Democrats in their districts, they do have to fear primary contests, particularly on the left. This realization impelled the election of California’s Nancy Pelosi as minority leader and marks the House Democrats’ move to the left and to irrelevancy.

The dilemma for moderate Democrats is similar to that which afflicted moderate Republicans until George W. Bush came along. To win nominations, they must appeal to the extremists in their own party and move so far to the left that they become unacceptable to the mainstream of American voters.

A vicious circle sets in. Moderates, repelled by the liberal stances of the Democratic Party, will move to Republican ranks and abandon their Democratic affiliation. This movement will empty the party’s ranks of its moderates and make takeover by the left more likely and more permanent.

The path the Democrats are about to tread is the same that left them impotent in the elections of 1980, 1984 and 1988 and akin to that which forced the British Labor Party to lose four consecutive national elections.

The capture of Saddam Hussein and the likely withdrawal of most American forces from Iraq by Election Day — if Bush is thinking clearly and can pull it off — will leave the leftist Democrats with no issues, only bitterness at having been robbed of their thunder by a fast-moving president.

Their lament at not having the economy, Iraq and prescription drugs as issues will parallel the wails of the 1996 Republicans in not having the balanced budget, crime or welfare to use as issues in toppling Clinton.

Good for President Bush.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2004; dickmorris; dlc; dnc; theleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
How did the left take over?

With the help of Communist organizations like "Move On" which have millions of dollars donated to them by Foreign communist organizations. They have used the internet to their advantage and have recruited thousands of young people who will do anything they say because "IT'S COOL" and not because they really believe in anything that they tell them. Most of them probably won't even vote in the election anyway.

1 posted on 12/18/2003 10:10:03 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
When conservatives, like myself, started becoming more active after the Democrats tried to steal the election in 2000, the liberals also came out from under their collective rocks and sent guys like Carville, Begala, Pelosi, Hillary, etc to become screetching machines for the left! They cannot see that their hatred for Bush is their downfall...
2 posted on 12/18/2003 10:17:37 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Carter a leftist, but Bill Clinton, a CENTRIST?!?

AlGore and Hillary- MOVING to the left?!?

Where has this guy been? Or is it me?

3 posted on 12/18/2003 10:20:54 AM PST by JustPlainJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
That happened a long-time ago.
4 posted on 12/18/2003 10:22:12 AM PST by FFIGHTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
a period in which the party controlled the White House for only four out of 20 years, when Jimmy Carter, a moderate southerner, was president.

I am speachless.

5 posted on 12/18/2003 10:22:44 AM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The moderates ran the Democratic Party from 1960 to 1972. Then the left took over, ruling until 1992 — a period in which the party controlled the White House for only four out of 20 years, when Jimmy Carter, a moderate southerner, was president. Capitalizing on their failures, the centrists regained ascendancy in 1992 with the nomination of Bill Clinton.

So, McGovern in 1972 was a moderate?
Jimmy Carter in 1976 was a moderate?
Mondale was a screaming leftist?
Dukakis was a screaming leftist?
Bill Clinton was a centrist?

Morris is just talking without making sense.

6 posted on 12/18/2003 10:24:56 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The more liberal the Democrat party becomes, the more moderates the Republican party absorbs. How will this fare for Republican conservatives? Are we to expect more massive spending and entitlements in the future (passed by Republican moderates)?

Increasingly, the credible political debate is occuring within the Republican party.
7 posted on 12/18/2003 10:31:32 AM PST by wesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Nah, the difference is Clinton pretended to be a centrist while Dean doesn't even bother. That's why regular people voted for Clinton and won't vote for Dean.
8 posted on 12/18/2003 10:32:51 AM PST by Hawkeye's Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
A vicious circle sets in. Moderates, repelled by the liberal stances of the Democratic Party, will move to Republican ranks and abandon their Democratic affiliation.

Not quite. It's more like moderate Democrats move into the ranks of Independents and vote for moderate Republicans, and right-of-center Independents actually become Republicans for the first time. That's what I'm seeing, anyway.

9 posted on 12/18/2003 10:33:54 AM PST by Catalonia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catalonia
In the old days, Democrats swithced to being Republicans, not independents. Think Reagan, Kirkpatrick, Phil Gramm, etc. I think (hope) that will continue to happen.
10 posted on 12/18/2003 10:37:00 AM PST by Capt. Jake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JustPlainJoe
What scares me is that compared to Dean, Clinton probably was a centrist. It is, after all, what Lenin said about Trotsky.
11 posted on 12/18/2003 10:38:13 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: areafiftyone
bump
13 posted on 12/18/2003 10:39:10 AM PST by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
It's easy to decode Morris if you remember this simple rule: Democrats who are elected are Moderates. Democrats who fail are Leftists. It's a performanced-based definition.

Thus while Morris would say that Jimmy Carter won because he was a Moderate, in reality Morris labels Jimmy Carter as a Moderate simply because he won. Similarly, Morris considers the far more centrist Dukakis a Lefty only because Dukakis lost.

Morris' other rule, which makes about as much sense, is that a woman's most attractive feature is her feet...

14 posted on 12/18/2003 10:41:30 AM PST by gridlock (There's no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant. The ingenuity of idiots knows no bounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I love this quote from Ronald Reagan, I'm not sure it's word for word, but he said something to the effect:

I didn't leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me.

It's how I feel exactly.
15 posted on 12/18/2003 10:43:39 AM PST by brownsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Here's a secret for you. Carville and Begala are rabid partisans, but they are technicians first. They see the numbers, and they know what is happening to the Party. A long period in exile.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

16 posted on 12/18/2003 10:46:18 AM PST by section9 (Major Kusanagi says, "Click on my pic and read my blog, or eat lead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Much of this is a matter of perception and PR, rather than reality. Morris was the expert on "triangulation," and he was largely responsible for clinton's re-election. If you really look at them, ALL the Democrats have been leftists. Jimmuh Carter never saw a Communist Dictator he didn't like. Harry Truman handed China to the Communists. FDR had a cabinet full of Communists and gave Eastern Europe to Stalin.

Although they are all leftists, the real difference is that some of them have pretended to be moderates, with assiduous help from the media, while others have screamed out their leftist views.

It's not that Hillary has moved to the left. She was always a Communist. It's just that she is currently talking out of the left side of her mouth.
17 posted on 12/18/2003 10:54:08 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
What scares me the most is people like Soros, though. He's got enough money to buy the election and given his comments, he'd do it by whatever means possible. Bush can stand up against attack ads and shrill comments...but money can buy a lot of corruption.

19 posted on 12/18/2003 10:59:47 AM PST by gardencatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
Amen....especially in Illinois, Florida & Arkansasses.
20 posted on 12/18/2003 11:07:26 AM PST by kahoutek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson