Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taking First Amendment battle online
The Boston Globe ^ | 12/15/2003 | Hiawatha Bray

Posted on 12/15/2003 8:18:41 PM PST by Radix

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Despite the best efforts of Congress and the US Supreme Court, the First Amendment survives -- online.

Last Wednesday, the US Supreme Court upheld the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform bill, which deliberately trims citizens' First Amendment rights. Among other things, the law limits the ability of groups like the National Rifle Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the like to broadcast radio and TV ads in the run-up to a federal election.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cfr; freedom; mccainfeingold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Radix; MeeknMing; nopardons; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; potlatch; GeronL; Shooter 2.5
McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan attempted to regulate emails and computers and websites originally.

They wanted to say your computer and software costs made you into a political "PAC" and could therefore be regulated and/or banned from political speech ot mention of any candidates during that 60-30 day period.

I see some very serious repercussions from CFR.

Very serious.

"Very"


21 posted on 12/15/2003 10:03:03 PM PST by autoresponder (SLICK http://0access.tripod.com/legacy.html CAPTURE http://0access.web1000.com/GW-Eagle-SadDamn.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
That's some big order! They can't see what comes from EVERY SINGLE computer, so they'll have to come up with some other idea.
22 posted on 12/15/2003 10:08:38 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: steve in DC
Powerful idea, Steve.
23 posted on 12/15/2003 10:10:42 PM PST by Libertina (FReepers of a feather flock together...isn't life great?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Before CFR passed I used to send Shays political emails with:

25¢ a copy

FREE SAMPLE

At the top

Internet media........
24 posted on 12/15/2003 10:11:56 PM PST by autoresponder (SLICK http://0access.tripod.com/legacy.html CAPTURE http://0access.web1000.com/GW-Eagle-SadDamn.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
Waste of time and money. I used to send Shays and LIEberman, and Dodd E-mail, and just got back stupid form letters.
25 posted on 12/15/2003 10:22:01 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: steve in DC
Internet radio has got to be one of the great new media opportunities.

If we could get the NRA to start up a few stations we would reap great benefits.

The real issue is that people have to want to listen. It has to be entertaining & not heavy-handed.

In a few years, internet TV will be bigger than internet radio. Again a marvelous chance for the NRA.

One "station" can cover the entire world. Programming is an issue, in that the station owner has to provide it, but this could give new acts a chance to start out.

Even congress has allowed media owners to editorialize, and they are going to have to pull the plug on all owners if they want to prevent our side from doing it.
26 posted on 12/15/2003 10:27:53 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
If I ever call Shays office I make sure to instruct them to never send me their staff written, Shays signed stock form letters.
27 posted on 12/15/2003 11:03:24 PM PST by autoresponder (SLICK http://0access.tripod.com/legacy.html CAPTURE http://0access.web1000.com/GW-Eagle-SadDamn.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
I used to do that too...after the first 10 or so of those offensive nonreply replies. LOL
28 posted on 12/15/2003 11:08:06 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Radix; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ..
Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

29 posted on 12/15/2003 11:17:45 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I'll spend all the money I want and I'll run ads on radio, TV or in the paper 30-60 days before an election if I want.

Let the toothless FEC come after me. And if the Justice Dept. bothers, I'll just go on camera and say, "we are in a war against terrorism and the Justice Dept. has time to arrest me for freedom of speech"?

I say tell SCOTUS to SHOVE IT and violate these "laws" with impunity.
30 posted on 12/15/2003 11:30:46 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Thanks for the ping!
31 posted on 12/16/2003 12:20:52 AM PST by Fawnn (Official Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and CookingWithPam.com person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve in DC
Another bump for post #4. Very very good idea.

Qwinn
32 posted on 12/16/2003 12:31:20 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
34 posted on 12/16/2003 3:05:39 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Radix
The problem is that while the Internet IS a powerful tool for communications, the leftists AND the media will work together to blast
"the people" (TM) with whatever spin they want... And let's face it... Those without Internet access (and political interests) far outnumber those who do. If they can get the uninformed to vote, then it's all over.

Mark
35 posted on 12/16/2003 3:54:07 AM PST by MarkL (Dammit Vermile!!!! I can't take any more of these close games! Chiefs 12-2!!! Woooo Hoooo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
The NRA already does video news/editorial reports at NRA Live with Wayne LaPierre. Click the link to open their page in a new browser window.

It looks like you need Real Player to get the video to work, but they have a link on the home page to download it.

36 posted on 12/16/2003 6:15:15 AM PST by HiJinx (Go with Courage, go with Honor, go in God's Grace. Come home when the job's done. We'll be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Freedom of speech ~ Bump!
37 posted on 12/16/2003 7:29:45 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valin
How about the "Constitution Channel"?
38 posted on 12/16/2003 7:47:58 AM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Ok, I hear ya...ummm...do you consider 12 hours not a rush job? I don't think it's a rush job, not at all, no I don't.

Anyway, here is the 1999 NRA Firearms Fact Card (Click to open in a new window).

And ditto for the 2003 Fact Card.

The 2003 card doesn't really address your question as well as the '99 issue. The numbers are at the end of the document. Oh, and you don't need to be an NRA member to go to their website and browse...they have lots of information and it's all free!

If you're so inclined (insert shameless plug here) check out the NRA Foundation. There are many opportunities for supporting grant programs, as well as some funding available for youth shooting and firearms safety programs. If you know anyone interested in getting Eddie Eagle started in a school or law enforcement program, this is where you start.

39 posted on 12/16/2003 7:57:21 AM PST by HiJinx (Go with Courage, go with Honor, go in God's Grace. Come home when the job's done. We'll be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Radix; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
A so-called 'Conservative' Congress passed the restriction on the 1st Amendment......

A so-called 'Conservative' President signed it into law......

A so-called 'Conservative' Supreme Court upheld it.......

....and now...it's being left up to us to refuse to obey it.

I think that we are up to the task at hand.

redrock

40 posted on 12/16/2003 9:42:19 AM PST by redrock (Boooga---Boooga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson