1 posted on
12/12/2003 5:58:01 AM PST by
Valin
To: Valin; RiflemanSharpe; Lazamataz; proud American in Canada; Congressman Billybob; backhoe; ...
If you want to be on or off this CFR-ping list let me know.
2 posted on
12/12/2003 6:01:56 AM PST by
Valin
(We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
To: Valin
Is Bush's signing of CFR more palatable because he indicated that the courts should review some of the more onerous provisions in the law?
I say NO. This is called passing the buck.
I suspect that he and Congress knew the law would stand up to the courts and Bush was just in CYA mode.
3 posted on
12/12/2003 6:02:44 AM PST by
Guillermo
(Shoot me if you ever see me on a Kobe Bryant, Michael Jackson or Scott Peterson thread)
To: Valin
7 posted on
12/12/2003 6:48:38 AM PST by
Congressman Billybob
(www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
To: Valin
In the end, a narrow majority of five Supreme Court justices was swayed by the argument that most issue ads broadcast near an election are shams.Thus a SCOTUS majority and Congress have made a wholly subjective judgment about the quality of someone else's speech about fundamental political matters, found it wanting, and declared it forbidden. Worse, the judgment is prospective and arbitrary because it it characterizes all such speech as "sham" without ever bothering to hear it.
This is beyond appalling.
To: All
Hey, everyone, I wrote a letter to Rush and copied my letters and links to these threads, but I can't find his email address on the site. Does anyone have it? Do you have to be a 24/7 member to send him email?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson