To: JohnHuang2
So 270 eyewitnesses should not believe their lying eyes? Granted, eyewitnesses are not always reliable but when you have 270 that say they saw the same thing there may be an awful lot to it.
To: Broadside Joe; billbears; 4ConservativeJustices; stainlessbanner
"Granted, eyewitnesses are not always reliable but when you have 270 that say they saw the same thing there may be an awful lot to it"
My gosh!! Oswald was acting alone, a nutcase, for crying out loud! TINFOIL HAT!! [/s]
(Hint: who was on board flight 800 who also worked for Ron Brown?)
6 posted on
12/12/2003 3:01:27 AM PST by
Ff--150
(that we through His poverty might be rich)
To: Broadside Joe
...So 270 eyewitnesses should not believe their lying eyes?.....
Poor Vince Foster. His murder will never be solved.
65 posted on
12/12/2003 6:32:27 AM PST by
bert
(Have you harassed a liberal today?)
To: Broadside Joe
So 270 eyewitnesses should not believe their lying eyes?I'll take the witnesses in the air, thank you, over *any* of the others (untrained civilians on the ground):
Table 1: Number of witnesses by situation and observation.
--------------------------------------------------------
Witness situation
Item Land Sea Air Subtotal Unknown Total
--------------------------------------------------------
Sight 420 195 37 652 18 670
Sound 167 48 0 215 24 239
Streak 172 78 6 256 2 258
Fireball (FB) 365 182 37 584 15 599
FB Split 122 61 16 199 1 200
FB Water 122 69 21 212 5 217
Total 460 202 37 --- 37 736
125 posted on
01/06/2004 1:11:44 PM PST by
_Jim
( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson