Skip to comments.
TWA FLIGHT 800: Pilot takes NTSB to court: CIA lied, expert eyewitnesses come forward
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Friday, December 12, 2003
| Jack Cashill
Posted on 12/12/2003 2:25:10 AM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: JohnHuang2
So 270 eyewitnesses should not believe their lying eyes? Granted, eyewitnesses are not always reliable but when you have 270 that say they saw the same thing there may be an awful lot to it.
To: JohnHuang2
I know I don't trust the United States govt. in regards to this nor in most every other matter.
Trust the C.I.A. and or F.B.I.? Not now or ever. If these rediculous agencies say the sky is blue, you'd be better off checking.
To: JohnHuang2
I'm interested in everyone's theory as to why there was such a massive coverup and who ordered it?
I think this was a terrorist attack covered up by high level gubment officials. Clinton (its the economy, stupid) couldn't have the sheeple too afraid to fly. The prevailing attitude was nothing to see here, keep flying.
4
posted on
12/12/2003 2:46:05 AM PST
by
demkicker
To: JohnHuang2
Maybe Clinton is about to get that 'legacy' he so desperately wants. Not exactly the one he has in mind though.
Bet the Hillary camp is working on the 'spin' for this one just in case.
5
posted on
12/12/2003 3:01:10 AM PST
by
Vinnie
To: Broadside Joe; billbears; 4ConservativeJustices; stainlessbanner
"Granted, eyewitnesses are not always reliable but when you have 270 that say they saw the same thing there may be an awful lot to it"
My gosh!! Oswald was acting alone, a nutcase, for crying out loud! TINFOIL HAT!! [/s]
(Hint: who was on board flight 800 who also worked for Ron Brown?)
6
posted on
12/12/2003 3:01:27 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(that we through His poverty might be rich)
To: Ff--150
(Hint: who was on board flight 800 who also worked for Ron Brown?)
I honestly don't know please enlighten me.
To: Broadside Joe
I'd like to know, too.
Ed
8
posted on
12/12/2003 3:06:56 AM PST
by
Sir_Ed
To: JohnHuang2
Of all the times I've read about this I just realized something.
How far was TWA 800 from LI when it's trouble began according to the CIA video. The reason I ask is because they tell that the craft climbed less than 4000 ft after the nose fell off.
If the plane was 10 miles from shore then to that closest person would a 4000 foot climb even come close to looking like a missile? I mean could that be mistaken. Seems to me that the climb would appear only 1/10th of that size due to the distance, and then only if it climbed directly vertical.
I have never believed the center tank and zoom climb, but this is the first time I have ever considered perspective of distance and height.
Please feel free to be hard on my theory here, I don't have a dog in the hunt so tear this appart, if it doesn't hold water, so be it.
9
posted on
12/12/2003 3:09:06 AM PST
by
Ispy4u
To: JohnHuang2
Makes you scratch you head and think...why would our government lie to us like that? What was to gain from this CIA video? Who ordered the bogus CIA story? Why was TWA 800 brought down? Who or what cargo was on board? Too many questions....The fact that Clinton was in office during this fiasco leads me to think something stinks to high heaven. But what? Was it a terror attck? Osama did not take credit. He would have for sure.
10
posted on
12/12/2003 3:17:15 AM PST
by
USMMA_83
To: Ff--150
Do you think "they" would bring down an entier liner for one person?
11
posted on
12/12/2003 3:19:07 AM PST
by
USMMA_83
To: JohnHuang2
I still always have to marvel at how on 9/10/2001 all the nutters thought the Navy accidentally shot it down during an exercise and on 9/12/2001 all the nutters thought that it was shot down by terrorists, and the Navy thing hasn't been mentioned since.
12
posted on
12/12/2003 3:26:33 AM PST
by
John H K
To: demkicker
I'm interested in everyone's theory as to why there was such a massive coverup and who ordered it? Clinton didn't want to rock Islam's boat and risk more terrorism. He was the ultimate appeaser. That's also why he wouldn't let the FBI pursue the Middle East connection to the OKC/Murrah bldg bombing.
To: Broadside Joe
"I honestly don't know please enlighten me."
Two more hints: The hole in the head of Ron Brown's corpse, and the moniker of the poster minus the "2."
14
posted on
12/12/2003 3:29:26 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(that we through His poverty might be rich)
To: Ff--150
You actually think "he" had it ordered? That's even too cold blooded for him.
15
posted on
12/12/2003 3:32:41 AM PST
by
USMMA_83
To: Ff--150
(Hint: who was on board flight 800 who also worked for Ron Brown?)
Two more hints: The hole in the head of Ron Brown's corpse, and the moniker of the poster minus the "2."
Ok how could have Huang been on flight 800? Was he not indicted?
To: Broadside Joe
"Ok how could have Huang been on flight 800? Was he not indicted?"
Mohamed Ferrat was on TWA 800. John Huang vanished IIRC. Remember the Lippo group?
17
posted on
12/12/2003 3:59:50 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(that we through His poverty might be rich)
To: Ff--150
"John Huang vanished IIRC. Remember the Lippo group?"
Yes but I thought that they had traced him to china..and don't remember anything about Ferrat. Is he a Lippo guy?
To: JohnHuang2; JohnFiorentino; backhoe; First_Salute
Bump and Ping.
19
posted on
12/12/2003 4:17:44 AM PST
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
To: JohnHuang2
I don't know what really happened.
As an ex-pilot I never believed the pitch-up story (although what I flew was single-engine, prop, Vne 125KIAS)
AS a volunteer firefighter, I KNOW how preposterous the idea of an explosion in an enclosed JET-A fuel tank is.
AS a citizen of the US, I don't trust the Clinton era people about anything.
For whatever reason, they don't want the sheeple to know what really happened here. All the intrigue usually comes down to money and power.
Some day we'll know.
20
posted on
12/12/2003 4:18:48 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson