Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981
"You want me to boot GW Bush and the only party left with any patriotism at all ? Not going to happen."

No. I'm voting for Bush as well. I'm horrified with CFR, which he signed, but he's still better than the Dems, who no longer even pretend not to be socialists.

"The Constitution and Bill of Rights do not serve in Congress, the White House, or the Supreme Court. They do not issue orders, write legislation, or render opinions. Power rests in the hands of leaders from one party or the other. There is no independent third way. There is either the Republicans or the PartyOfTraitors. You will get Bush or Dean/Hillary/Gore/Clark."

Our leaders are sworn to protect those documents that you seem so blithely able to disregard. Those documents are what this country is about. While I agree that we have to vote Republican, I cannot help but be appalled at what seems to be happening to our country, on a Republican watch.

"Precisely identify and document your allegation.

My apologies, my allegation is incorrect. Posts 21 and 46 came close, IMO, but did not actually label the other posters as traitors and cowards. My point here is that it is understandable that some here are disillusioned or betrayed enough to consider withholding their votes. Doesn't mean they are making the right decision, but also doesn't mean they are legitimate targets for such scorn.

You didn't actually answer my request for your definition of conservatism, rather you correctly implied that Hillary, Dean and the Democrats will destroy it. But I am going to assume it means for you as it does for me: allegiance to our founding documents and the ideal of individual freedom which they stand for. My reason for asking was the ferocity with which you argued against those who seemed most appalled by CFR. I have seen a few FReepers who don't really mind CFR.

I am hoping, as you are, for a Republican sweep next year, since I think it's our only hope. But I am starting to wonder what even Republicans stand for these days. My gut feeling still tells me that GW is a good guy who sees a big picture. But I'm not as sure of it as I was. Didn't his guys just praise the Court's decision on CFR? If so, that puts GW squarely in the camp with Ginsberg, Breyer, Bader, Souter and O'Connor, instead of in the camp with Scalia, Rhenquist, Kennedy and Thomas.

284 posted on 12/12/2003 6:56:47 AM PST by Sam Cree (democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree
You didn't actually answer my request for your definition of conservatism,

Conservatism is the struggle to retain whatever goodness remains in this country and by extension the world.

Government should be small enough so as not to interfere with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness while being powerful enough to fight the evil that threatens it.


291 posted on 12/12/2003 7:28:47 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson