[Howlin]

If you are saying that I made the case WHY he signed it, then I won't argue with that.

But I never, ever said he SHOULD have signed it.

To say different than that is dishonest on your part.

[NittanyLion]

If you are saying that I made the case WHY he signed it, then I won't argue with that. But I never, ever said he SHOULD have signed it.

I see. You adamantly defended his signing it, but that shouldn't be taken as an endorsement of the bill.

I've made this mistake before. A few years ago I misunderstood the meaning of "is".