If you are saying that I made the case WHY he signed it, then I won't argue with that. But I never, ever said he SHOULD have signed it. I see. You adamantly defended his signing it, but that shouldn't be taken as an endorsement of the bill.
I've made this mistake before. A few years ago I misunderstood the meaning of "is".
I know what you mean; I had to learn the meaning of "parsing." I see you already understood what that meant.